IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v19y2015i2p89-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Line and Staff Functions in Organizations Revisited: A Bionic System Analogy Using ISM

Author

Listed:
  • Alpana Agarwal
  • Prem Vrat

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify variables and their interrelationships causing line and staff conflict in organizations. Specifically it is comparing and analyzing the causes of line and staff conflict from human body perspective, assuming it to be an optimally managed organization. A generally applicable framework that establishes relationship between these variables is developed using interpretative structural modelling (ISM). The developed framework is then compared with the organization of line and staff functions in the human body, presuming that with this the real cause of the problem could be understood. In this effort, it has been found that an optimal degree of flexibility, top management involvement, equity, clearly defined roles and appropriate design and reporting relationships are the major strategies followed by human body that can help managers to eliminate conflict. It is expected that based on this comparison some ways of resolving conflict within organizations can be suggested. Besides, we can also expect that mimicking a variety of elements in human body organization can inspire business organizations to learn improvements in their design and function too.

Suggested Citation

  • Alpana Agarwal & Prem Vrat, 2015. "Line and Staff Functions in Organizations Revisited: A Bionic System Analogy Using ISM," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 89-103, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:89-103
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262915575651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262915575651
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262915575651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M.N. Qureshi & Dinesh Kumar & Pradeep Kumar, 2007. "Modeling the logistics outsourcing relationship variables to enhance shippers' productivity and competitiveness in logistical supply chain," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 689-714, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sushil, 2018. "How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 473-487, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    2. He-Yau Kang & Meng-Chan Hung & W. L. Pearn & Amy H. I. Lee & Mei-Sung Kang, 2011. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Wind Farm Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Gede Ginaya, 2019. "Mixed-Strategies of Marketing in BBTF: Seller Persuasion Towards Prospective Buyers," GATR Journals jmmr203, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "Evaluating Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation for Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Li, Ling, 2011. "Assessing the relational benefits of logistics services perceived by manufacturers in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 58-67, July.
    6. Kuldeep Singh & Madhvendra Misra, 2021. "Developing an agricultural entrepreneur inclination model for sustainable agriculture by integrating expert mining and ISM–MICMAC," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5122-5150, April.
    7. Omoruyi Osayuwamen, 2018. "Competitiveness Through the Integration of Logistics Activities in SMEs," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(3), pages 15-32, December.
    8. Shiang-Min Meng, 2014. "Logistics Image of Outsourcing Clients to The Wireless Telecommunications Industry: How is it related to The Service Value of Air Cargo Logistics Providers?," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(8), pages 940-955, August.
    9. Balakrishnan, VN & Mohamad Khan, Jamal Khan, 2018. "Influential Factors of Competitive Advantage Progression on SME Third-Party Logistics in Selangor Malaysia," MPRA Paper 89091, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Arif Jamal Habib Gokak & Smita Mehendale & Sanjay M. Bhāle, 2023. "Modelling and analysis for higher education shadow institutions in Indian context: an ISM approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3425-3451, August.
    11. Bouzon, Marina & Govindan, Kannan & Rodriguez, Carlos Manuel Taboada, 2015. "Reducing the extraction of minerals: Reverse logistics in the machinery manufacturing industry sector in Brazil using ISM approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 27-36.
    12. Vokoun Marek, 2017. "Productivity of Czech logistic firms: quality orientation, entrants and multinationals," Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia, Sciendo, vol. 10(38), pages 239-247, September.
    13. Yana Hendayana, 2019. "The Effect of Productivity and Innovation on the Competitiveness of Batik SMEs in West Java Indonesia," GATR Journals jmmr204, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    14. Alpana Agarwal & Prem Vrat, 2017. "Modeling Attributes of Human Body Organization Using ISM and AHP," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 44-62, June.
    15. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "Evaluating and Prioritizing the Enablers of Supply Chain Performance Management System (SCPMS) for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Sangita Choudhary, 2016. "Equity Investment Decisions: Determinants for Retail Investors," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 131-144, December.
    17. Paranitharan Kannusamy Panneer Selvam & Ramesh Babu Thangavelu, 2019. "The IMBES model for achieving excellence in manufacturing industry: an interpretive structural modeling approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 602-622, August.
    18. Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj, 2017. "Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 408-422, June.
    19. Govindan, Kannan & Chaudhuri, Atanu, 2016. "Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-195.
    20. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Third-Party Logistics Services Providers (3PLSP) Selection for Supply Chain Strategic Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:89-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.