IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v10y2006i2p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Identification: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rashmi Nakra

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to take a preliminary look at the relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational identification. Communication Satisfaction refers to the degree of satisfaction of tin employee with the organization's total communication and Organizational Identification is one of the forms of an individual's attachment to an organization that has been recognized as having important implications for organizational effectiveness. Data was collected using an adapted version of the Down's, (1990) Communication Audit Questionnaire (CAQ) and the six-item Organizational Identification Scale developed by Ashforth (1992). The results were analysed with correlation analysis for studying the relationships between the employee's overall communication satisfaction, the various dimensions of communication satisfaction and organizational identification. It was found that the communication satisfaction composite and its dimensions have significant positive relationships with organizational identification. The limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rashmi Nakra, 2006. "Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Identification: An Empirical Study," Vision, , vol. 10(2), pages 41-51, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:10:y:2006:i:2:p:41-51
    DOI: 10.1177/097226290601000206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097226290601000206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097226290601000206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael H. Zack, 1993. "Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 207-239, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lujun Su & Yinghua Huang, 2018. "How does Perceived Destination Social Responsibility Impact Revisit Intentions: The Mediating Roles of Destination Preference and Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Nikolic, Milan & Vukonjanski, Jelena & Nedeljkovic, Milena & Hadzic, Olga & Terek, Edit, 2014. "The relationships between communication satisfaction, emotional intelligence and the GLOBE organizational culture dimensions of middle managers in Serbian organizations," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(4), pages 387-412.
    3. Steven Bauer & Dongkuk Lim, 2019. "Effect of Communication Practices on Volunteer Organization Identification and Retention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jim Sheffield, 2004. "The Design of GSS-Enabled Interventions: A Habermasian Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 415-435, September.
    2. Martha L. Maznevski & Katherine M. Chudoba, 2000. "Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 473-492, October.
    3. Rosalie J. Ocker & Gayle J. Yaverbaum, 1999. "Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 427-440, September.
    4. Hoegl, Martin & Proserpio, Luigi, 2004. "Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1153-1165, October.
    5. Stephanie Watts Sussman & Wendy Schneier Siegal, 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    6. Yoo, Weon-Sang & Lee, Yunjung & Park, JungKun, 2010. "The role of interactivity in e-tailing: Creating value and increasing satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 89-96.
    7. Richard P. Bagozzi & Utpal M. Dholakia, 2006. "Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1099-1115, July.
    8. Wee-Kek Tan & Chuan-Hoo Tan & Hock-Hai Teo, 2012. "Conveying information effectively in a virtual world: Insights from synthesized task closure and media richness," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1198-1212, June.
    9. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Articles and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-44, June.
    10. Ágnes Szukits, 2022. "The illusion of data-driven decision making – The mediating effect of digital orientation and controllers’ added value in explaining organizational implications of advanced analytics," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 403-446, September.
    11. Andersson, Krister P., 2004. "Who Talks with Whom? The Role of Repeated Interactions in Decentralized Forest Governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 233-249, February.
    12. Gerardine DeSanctis & Peter Monge, 1999. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 693-703, December.
    13. Michael Boyer O'Leary & Mark Mortensen, 2010. "Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 115-131, February.
    14. Brian E. Mennecke & Joseph S. Valacich & Bradley C. Wheeler, 2000. "The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(6), pages 507-529, November.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12988 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Pur Purwanto & Kuswandi Kuswandi & Fatmah Fatmah, 2020. "Interactive Applications with Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Trust among Digital Assistant Users," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 64-75.
    17. Bryan K. Hasty & Anne P. Massey & Susan A. Brown, 2006. "Role-Based Experiences, Media Perceptions, and Knowledge Transfer Success in Virtual Dyads," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 367-387, July.
    18. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Dorothy E. Leidner, 1999. "Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 791-815, December.
    19. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    20. Bruhn, Manfred & Schäfer, Daniela B. & Schoenmüller, Verena, 2012. "Markenkommunikation auf Social Media-Plattformen – Anforderungen aus Konsumentensicht und deren Einfluss auf Zielgrössen des Markenmanagements," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(1), pages 64-84.
    21. Batia M. Wiesenfeld & Sumita Raghuram & Raghu Garud, 1999. "Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 777-790, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:10:y:2006:i:2:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.