IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v58y2021i2p425-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public realm ethnography: (Non-)Participation, co-presence and the challenge of situated multiplicity

Author

Listed:
  • Alasdair Jones

Abstract

Against the backdrop of abstract accounts of a variety of processes associated with the ‘end of public space’ (disneyfication, commodification, privatisation, gentrification, securitisation and so on), the last few decades have witnessed a marked growth in ethnographic accounts of the production, meaning and experience of urban public spaces. Methodologically, studying these dimensions of public space ethnographically poses clear challenges for how researchers design and conduct their fieldwork: practically, how can fieldworkers participate in a socio-spatial context typically characterised by ‘situated multiplicity’ (Amin A (2008) Collective culture and urban public space. City 12(1): 5–24) and co-presence with strangers? Moreover, what do researchers do when there are no core group activities, institutional roles or (sub-)cultural practices to participate in? With these questions in mind, I first seek to review the practical fieldwork techniques used by ethnographers interested in studying the urban public realm. I then use this review to synthesise and distil a set of four interlinked fieldwork heuristics for public realm ethnography.

Suggested Citation

  • Alasdair Jones, 2021. "Public realm ethnography: (Non-)Participation, co-presence and the challenge of situated multiplicity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 425-440, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:2:p:425-440
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098020904261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020904261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098020904261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judit Bodnar, 2015. "Reclaiming public space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2090-2104, September.
    2. Ash Amin, 2008. "Collective culture and urban public space," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bradley Rink, 2023. "Public space on the move: Mediating mobility, stillness and encounter on a Cape Town bus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3027-3044, November.
    2. Yao-Tai Li & Katherine Whitworth, 2022. "Reclaiming Hong Kong through neighbourhood-making: A study of the 2019 Anti-ELAB movement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1372-1388, May.
    3. Olga Loza & Philip Roscoe, 2024. "Making Markets Material: Enactments, Resistances, and Erasures of Materiality in the Graduate Labour Market," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(3), pages 684-704, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tali Hatuka & Eran Toch, 2017. "Being visible in public space: The normalisation of asymmetrical visibility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 984-998, March.
    2. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Regan Koch & Alan Latham, 2013. "On the Hard Work of Domesticating a Public Space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(1), pages 6-21, January.
    4. Cameron McAuliffe, 2013. "Legal Walls and Professional Paths: The Mobilities of Graffiti Writers in Sydney," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 518-537, February.
    5. Xuefan Zhang, 2017. "Identifying consumerist privately owned public spaces: The ideal type of mass private property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3464-3479, November.
    6. Lise Mahieus & Eugene McCann, 2023. "“Hot+Noisy” Public Space: Conviviality, “Unapologetic Asianness,” and the Future of Vancouver’s Chinatown," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 77-88.
    7. Francesca Froy, 2023. "Learning from architectural theory about how cities work as complex and evolving spatial systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 495-510.
    8. Alison L. Bain & Julie A. Podmore, 2020. "Scavenging for LGBTQ2S Public Library Visibility on Vancouver’s Periphery," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(4), pages 601-615, September.
    9. Marie Gibert-Flutre, 2022. "Rhythmanalysis: Rethinking the politics of everyday negotiations in ordinary public spaces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 279-297, February.
    10. Carmela Cucuzzella & Morteza Hazbei & Sherif Goubran, 2021. "Activating Data through Eco-Didactic Design in the Public Realm: Enabling Sustainable Development in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    11. Talja Blokland & Robert Vief & Daniela Krüger & Henrik Schultze, 2023. "Roots and routes in neighbourhoods. Length of residence, belonging and public familiarity in Berlin, Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1949-1967, August.
    12. Jenny Mbaye & Cecilia Dinardi, 2019. "Ins and outs of the cultural polis: Informality, culture and governance in the global South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 578-593, February.
    13. Deborah Leslie & Norma Rantisi & Shannon Black, 2024. "Mobilizing space to realize the transformative potential of work integration social enterprises through a politics of scale and scope," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(4), pages 1024-1044, June.
    14. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2018. "Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the ‘divided city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3454-3473, November.
    15. Eva Youkhana, 2015. "A Conceptual Shift in Studies of Belonging and the Politics of Belonging," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 10-24.
    16. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    17. Massimo Bricocoli & Benedetta Marani & Stefania Sabatinelli, 2022. "The Spaces of Social Services as Social Infrastructure: Insights From a Policy-Innovation Project in Milan," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 381-397.
    18. Qin Li & Shaomin Peng & Zonghao Chen & Han Du & Yijun Liu & Wenlong Li, 2024. "Resilience Evaluation and Renovation Strategies of Public Spaces in Old Communities from a Disaster-Adaptive Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Alena Coblence & Luděk Sýkora, 2022. "THE PERFORMATIVITY OF METROPOLIZATION: How Material‐Discursive Practices Institutionalize the Prague Metropolitan Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 502-521, July.
    20. Zengwei Xu & Shanshan Miao, 2022. "Effect of Public Space on Collective Action for Rural Waste Management and the Mediating Effects of Social Capital," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:2:p:425-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.