IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/remava/v25y2017i1p103-111n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Activities of Local Governments in the Revitalization of Public Space in Bulgaria and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Kostov Ivo

    (Department of Economics and Management of Construction Faculty of Economics University of Economics – Varna Bulgaria)

  • Palicki Sławomir

    (Department of Spatial and Environmental Economics Faculty of Management Poznań University of Economics and Business Poland)

  • Rącka Izabela

    (Department of Management and Public Law Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities The President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz Poland)

Abstract

The research discussed in the article focuses on public space in urban areas and revitalization activities carried out by local governments. The goals of the paper are to identify the conditions and opportunities for the development of public space by local governments of Bulgaria and Poland, to find regularities (similarities and differences) and to assess the actions taken. The specific objective is to illustrate the process of planning and managing selected large revitalization investments in urban public spaces in Bulgaria and Poland. The research methods used comprise the analysis of literature, including official documents and acts of law and case studies.The paper analyzes the conditions and manifestations of activities taken by local governments regarding investment in public space (development and revitalization of public space programs and investing in real estate) in Bulgaria and Poland, using examples from selected cities. The authors selected two comparable urban areas: Varna in Bulgaria and Poznań in Poland, chosen intentionally due to the similarity of the two post-socialist bloc countries and the availability of information. Bulgarian and Polish state law and various acts of local law were analyzed. The experimental part of the publication introduces case studies of investments in the revitalization of real estate in public space managed by the local governments. It shows examples of projects which are relevant to the development of the cities under study.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostov Ivo & Palicki Sławomir & Rącka Izabela, 2017. "The Activities of Local Governments in the Revitalization of Public Space in Bulgaria and Poland," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 103-111, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:remava:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:103-111:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/remav-2017-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/remav-2017-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siqi Zheng & Matthew E. Kahn, 2013. "Does Government Investment in Local Public Goods Spur Gentrification? Evidence from Beijing," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Judit Bodnar, 2015. "Reclaiming public space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2090-2104, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kazak Jan K. & Simeunović Nataša & Hendricks Andreas, 2019. "Hidden Public Value Identification of Real Estate Management Decisions," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(4), pages 96-104, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tali Hatuka & Eran Toch, 2017. "Being visible in public space: The normalisation of asymmetrical visibility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 984-998, March.
    2. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Xuefan Zhang, 2017. "Identifying consumerist privately owned public spaces: The ideal type of mass private property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3464-3479, November.
    4. Devin Michelle Bunten & Matthew E. Kahn, 2014. "The Impact of Emerging Climate Risks on Urban Real Estate Price Dynamics," NBER Working Papers 20018, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Guerrieri, Veronica & Hartley, Daniel & Hurst, Erik, 2013. "Endogenous gentrification and housing price dynamics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 45-60.
    6. Ruohan Hu, 2017. "The impact of rail transit on the distribution of new housing projects in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1867-1886, June.
    7. Kai Liu & Toshiaki Ichinose, 2017. "Hedonic Price Modeling of New Residential Property Values in Xi’an City, China," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(9), pages 42-56, September.
    8. Fang, Hanming & Gu, Quanlin & Zhou, Li-An, 2019. "The gradients of power: Evidence from the Chinese housing market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 32-52.
    9. Claudio M. Rocha, 2023. "Rio 2016 Olympic Legacy for Residents of Favelas: Revisiting the Case of Vila Autódromo Five Years Later," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Jan K. Brueckner & Shihe Fu & Yizhen Gu & Junfu Zhang, 2017. "Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(4), pages 663-677, July.
    11. Marie Gibert-Flutre, 2022. "Rhythmanalysis: Rethinking the politics of everyday negotiations in ordinary public spaces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 279-297, February.
    12. Gupta, Arpit & Van Nieuwerburgh, Stijn & Kontokosta, Constantine, 2022. "Take the Q train: Value capture of public infrastructure projects," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Yong Chen & David J. Lewis & Bruce Weber, 2021. "Natural amenities and skill sorting in rural communities: a case study of land conservation policy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(3), pages 649-669, December.
    14. Jenny Mbaye & Cecilia Dinardi, 2019. "Ins and outs of the cultural polis: Informality, culture and governance in the global South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 578-593, February.
    15. Wang, Yiming & Feng, Suwei & Deng, Zhongwei & Cheng, Shuangyu, 2016. "Transit premium and rent segmentation: A spatial quantile hedonic analysis of Shanghai Metro," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 61-69.
    16. Lin, Jen-Jia & Yang, Shu-Han, 2019. "Proximity to metro stations and commercial gentrification," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 79-89.
    17. Shijun Jia & Yourong Wang & Gang-Zhi Fan, 2018. "Home-Purchase Limits and Housing Prices: Evidence from China," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 386-409, April.
    18. Guiwen Liu & Jiayue Zhao & Hongjuan Wu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2022. "Spatial Pattern of the Determinants for the Private Housing Rental Prices in Highly Dense Populated Chinese Cities—Case of Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Meriläinen, Marjut & Karhula, Aleksi & Kurvinen, Antti & Falkenbach, Heidi & Ala-Mantila, Sanna, 2024. "Transit-induced socioeconomic ascent and new metro stations in Helsinki Metropolitan Area: Distinct effects on renters, homeowners, and pre-existing housing dwellers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Seungwoo Chin & Matthew E. Kahn & Hyungsik Roger Moon, 2020. "Estimating the Gains from New Rail Transit Investment: A Machine Learning Tree Approach," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 48(3), pages 886-914, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:remava:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:103-111:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.