IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10802-d901708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Design of Community Museums Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method

Author

Listed:
  • Sifan Guo

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xuesen Zheng

    (Human Factors Research Group, Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG9 2RD, UK)

  • Timothy Heath

    (Human Factors Research Group, Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG9 2RD, UK)

Abstract

The new museum movement of the twentieth century has driven the development of the form and function of museums around the world. Museums began to be actively open to the public, and some new concepts of museums, such as eco-museums and community museums, emerged. The aim of these museums is to build a cultural bridge between people and the city and to promote the harmonious development of society, economy, and culture. The visitors, as the service targets of the museum, will directly influence the popularity of the museum among the masses by their evaluation of the museum experience; however, at present, there is a clear gap between the design of many museums and the feedback of subsequent visitors’ experiences. Only by understanding visitors’ feelings and preferences can subsequent museum design be improved; this paper will focus on demonstrating the application of the mathematical idea of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to community museums; it establishes a community museum quality evaluation system based on human-centered design principles from the perspective of urban community museums and constructs a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of a community museum experience. Finally, the design of a community museum in Nottingham, UK, is used as an example to make a comprehensive evaluation of its quality. According to the analysis, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has practical value in scientifically evaluating the quality of urban community museums through data on the visitor experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Sifan Guo & Xuesen Zheng & Timothy Heath, 2022. "Research on the Design of Community Museums Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10802-:d:901708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judit Bodnar, 2015. "Reclaiming public space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2090-2104, September.
    2. David Adams & Steve Tiesdell & James T. White, 2013. "Smart Parcelization and Place Diversity: Reconciling Real Estate and Urban Design Priorities," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 459-477, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuesen Zheng & Sifan Guo & Timothy Heath, 2023. "Directing Reused Industrial Heritage to Public Taste: The Case of 1933 Old Millfun, Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tali Hatuka & Eran Toch, 2017. "Being visible in public space: The normalisation of asymmetrical visibility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 984-998, March.
    2. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Xuefan Zhang, 2017. "Identifying consumerist privately owned public spaces: The ideal type of mass private property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3464-3479, November.
    4. Marie Gibert-Flutre, 2022. "Rhythmanalysis: Rethinking the politics of everyday negotiations in ordinary public spaces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 279-297, February.
    5. Jenny Mbaye & Cecilia Dinardi, 2019. "Ins and outs of the cultural polis: Informality, culture and governance in the global South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 578-593, February.
    6. Md Amiruzzaman & Ye Zhao & Stefanie Amiruzzaman & Aryn C. Karpinski & Tsung Heng Wu, 2023. "An AI-based framework for studying visual diversity of urban neighborhoods and its relationship with socio-demographic variables," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 315-337, April.
    7. Tauri Tuvikene & Wladimir Sgibnev & Wojciech Kȩbłowski & Jason Finch, 2023. "Public transport as public space: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 2963-2978, November.
    8. Alasdair Jones, 2021. "Public realm ethnography: (Non-)Participation, co-presence and the challenge of situated multiplicity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 425-440, February.
    9. Ryanne Flock, 2024. "Creating the spectacular city in everyday life: A governance analysis of urban public space in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1094-1110, May.
    10. Bradley Rink, 2023. "Public space on the move: Mediating mobility, stillness and encounter on a Cape Town bus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3027-3044, November.
    11. Anna-Leena Toivanen, 2023. "On the move in the (post)colonial metropolis: The Paris Metro in Francophone African and Afrodiasporic fiction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3061-3077, November.
    12. Kevin KH Tsang, 2023. "Distractions in a disruption: The soothing effect of the heritage bus ride during London Tube strikes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3078-3091, November.
    13. Kostov Ivo & Palicki Sławomir & Rącka Izabela, 2017. "The Activities of Local Governments in the Revitalization of Public Space in Bulgaria and Poland," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 103-111, March.
    14. Paul Milbourne, 2021. "Growing public spaces in the city: Community gardening and the making of new urban environments of publicness," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 2901-2919, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10802-:d:901708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.