IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i11p2337-2353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’

Author

Listed:
  • Wouter van Gent

    (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands)

  • Cody Hochstenbach

    (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands)

  • Justus Uitermark

    (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

The Dutch government introduced the Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems in 2006 to bolster local regeneration efforts. The act enables local governments to stop specific groups of deprived households from moving into designated neighbourhoods. More specifically, the Act allows local governments to refuse a residence permit to persons who have lived in the metropolitan region for less than six years and who do not receive an income from work, pensions or student loans. The policy is based on the idea that reducing the influx of poor newcomers improves liveability by providing a temporary relief of the demand for public services and by making neighbourhoods demographically ‘balanced’ or ‘socially mixed’. This review examines the socio-spatial effects of the Act in Rotterdam between 2006 and 2013. While the Act produces socio-demographic changes, the state of the living environment in designated areas seems to be worsening rather than improving. Our findings show that the policy restricts the rights of excluded groups without demonstrably improving safety or liveability. The review concludes with a reflection on how the Act may signify a broader change in European statecraft and urban policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach & Justus Uitermark, 2018. "Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2337-2353, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:11:p:2337-2353
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017717214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017717214
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017717214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Andersson & Sako Musterd, 2005. "Area‐Based Policies: A Critical Appraisal," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(4), pages 377-389, September.
    2. Wendy Sarkissian, 1976. "The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 231-246, October.
    3. Mirko Noordegraaf, 2008. "Meanings of measurement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 221-239, March.
    4. Zara Bergsten & Emma Holmqvist, 2013. "Possibilities of building a mixed city – evidence from Swedish cities," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 288-311, September.
    5. Rebecca J. Walter & Jill Viglione & Marie Skubak Tillyer, 2017. "One Strike to Second Chances: Using Criminal Backgrounds in Admission Decisions for Assisted Housing," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 734-750, September.
    6. Harm Kaal, 2011. "A conceptual history of livability," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 532-547, October.
    7. W. Van Gent, 2010. "Housing Context and Social Transformation Strategies in Neighbourhood Regeneration in Western European Cities," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 63-87.
    8. Tom Slater, 2013. "Your Life Chances Affect Where You Live: A Critique of the ‘Cottage Industry’ of Neighbourhood Effects Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 367-387, March.
    9. Justus Uitermark, 2014. "Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1418-1436, July.
    10. Paul Lawless & Sarah Pearson, 2012. "Outcomes from Community Engagement in Urban Regeneration: Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 509-527, December.
    11. Zara Bergsten & Emma Holmqvist, 2013. "Possibilities of building a mixed city – evidence from Swedish cities," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 288-311, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone Scarpa, 2015. "The impact of income inequality on economic residential segregation: The case of Malmö, 1991–2010," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 906-922, April.
    2. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    3. David J. Madden, 2014. "Neighborhood as Spatial Project: Making the Urban Order on the Downtown Brooklyn Waterfront," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 471-497, March.
    4. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    5. Heike Hanhörster & Susanne Wessendorf, 2020. "The Role of Arrival Areas for Migrant Integration and Resource Access," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-10.
    6. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Chih Hoong Sin, 2002. "The Quest for a Balanced Ethnic Mix: Singapore's Ethnic Quota Policy Examined," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1347-1374, July.
    8. Baka, Anastasia & Mabon, Leslie, 2020. "Assessing equality in neighbourhood availability of quality greenspace in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom," SocArXiv d9jeh, Center for Open Science.
    9. Sandra Huning & Nina Schuster, 2015. "‘Social Mixing' or ‘Gentrification'? Contradictory Perspectives on Urban Change in the Berlin District of Neukölln," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 738-755, July.
    10. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    11. Sylvana Jahre, 2021. "Postmigrant Spatial Justice? The Case of ‘Berlin Develops New Neighbourhoods’ (BENN)," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 80-90.
    12. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Paul Joseph Draus & Juliette Roddy & Anthony McDuffie, 2014. "‘We don’t have no neighbourhood’: Advanced marginality and urban agriculture in Detroit," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2523-2538, September.
    14. Jacob Faber, 2021. "Contemporary echoes of segregationist policy: Spatial marking and the persistence of inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 1067-1086, April.
    15. Anne Slob & Ronald Van Kempen & Gideon Bolt, 2006. "Spatial Knock-On Effects of Area-Based Urban Policies: Practices From Utrecht, the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa06p464, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Sunmin Jun & Mengying Li & Juchul Jung, 2022. "Air Pollution (PM 2.5 ) Negatively Affects Urban Livability in South Korea and China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Maria Belén Vázquez Brage, 2024. "A Systematic Review: How Is Urban Vulnerability in Fragmented European Cities Measured?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    18. Dalal, Pamela & Chen, Yali & Ravulaparthy, Srinath & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2012. "Dynamic Opportunity-Based Multipurpose Accessibility Indicators in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt474714fg, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Saeed Zanganeh Shahraki & Narges Ahmadifard & Hossein Farhadikhah & Bagher Fotouhi Mehrabani & Asghar Haydari & Yaghob Abdali & Vahid Abbasi Fallah & Ebrahim Farhadi & Sirio Cividino & Sabato Vinci & , 2020. "Spatial Planning, Urban Governance and the Economic Context: The Case of ‘Mehr’ Housing Plan, Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Anders Tønnesen & Kari Larsen & Joar Skrede & Vibeke Nenseth, 2014. "Understanding the Geographies of Transport and Cultural Heritage: Comparing Two Urban Development Programs in Oslo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:11:p:2337-2353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.