IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa06p464.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial Knock-On Effects of Area-Based Urban Policies: Practices From Utrecht, the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Slob
  • Ronald Van Kempen
  • Gideon Bolt

Abstract

In many West European countries the welfare state is retreating and instruments of urban policy have changed. Urban policies are now often area based, which means that action is taken in a spatially defined area. One of the problems of this approach is that it leads to a so called spatial knock-on effect. This is when an area-based approach causes side effects in other areas, that are not involved in the policy. So far, most interest is in the effects for the targeted area, and less attention is being paid to the side effects for other areas. In our opinion this has to change in order to have sound evaluations of the effectiveness of area based urban policies. The aim of this paper is to take a closer look at the effects of area based urban policies in both targeted areas and non targeted areas from a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. In the quantitative approach we examine how the amount of problems in both targeted and non targeted areas has changed since area based urban policy has been implemented. In the qualitative approach information is gathered by interviewing policymakers to find out in what way they deal with spatial knock-on effects. All of this has been studied in the context of three cities in the Netherlands. In the end of the paper we aim to explain spatial knock-on effects and try to strengthen this explanation with several theoretical insights. We also draw some conclusions for further research that can be useful for policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Slob & Ronald Van Kempen & Gideon Bolt, 2006. "Spatial Knock-On Effects of Area-Based Urban Policies: Practices From Utrecht, the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa06p464, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa06/papers/464.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Andersson & Sako Musterd, 2005. "Area‐Based Policies: A Critical Appraisal," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(4), pages 377-389, September.
    2. Ronald Van Kempen, 2000. "Big cities policy in the Netherlands," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 91(2), pages 197-203, May.
    3. Ronald van Kempen & A. şule Özüekren, 1998. "Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1631-1656, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Merle Zwiers & Maarten van Ham & Reinout Kleinhans, 2019. "The effects of physical restructuring on the socioeconomic status of neighbourhoods: Selective migration and upgrading," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1647-1663, June.
    3. Sako Musterd & Ronald Van Kempen, 2009. "Segregation And Housing Of Minority Ethnic Groups In Western European Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 559-566, September.
    4. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach & Justus Uitermark, 2018. "Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2337-2353, August.
    5. Hazel Easthope & Wendy Stone & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The decline of ‘advantageous disadvantage’ in gateway suburbs in Australia: The challenge of private housing market settlement for newly arrived migrants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1904-1923, July.
    6. Dalal, Pamela & Chen, Yali & Ravulaparthy, Srinath & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2012. "Dynamic Opportunity-Based Multipurpose Accessibility Indicators in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt474714fg, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Kadi Mägi & Kadri Leetmaa & Tiit Tammaru & Maarten van Ham, 2016. "Types of spatial mobility and change in people's ethnic residential contexts," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(41), pages 1161-1192.
    8. Chiu, Lai Fong & West, Robert M., 2007. "Health intervention in social context: Understanding social networks and neighbourhood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(9), pages 1915-1927, November.
    9. Özlem Güzey & Nevin Gültekin & Ogan Kýrsaçlýoðlu & Erman Aksoy & Ela Ataç, 2014. "Acculturation Process of the Immigrant Turks Living in Deventer, The Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa14p70, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Henrik Gutzon Larsen & Anders Lund Hansen, 2008. "Gentrification—Gentle or Traumatic? Urban Renewal Policies and Socioeconomic Transformations in Copenhagen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2429-2448, November.
    11. Anders Tønnesen & Kari Larsen & Joar Skrede & Vibeke Nenseth, 2014. "Understanding the Geographies of Transport and Cultural Heritage: Comparing Two Urban Development Programs in Oslo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Carolina Pacchi & Nicola Francesco Dotti & Mariachiara Barzotto, 2022. "New working spaces: Policy perspectives before and after the covid-19 pandemic," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/371915, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Aarland, Kristin & Osland, Liv & Gjestland, Arnstein, 2017. "Do area-based intervention programs affect house prices? A quasi-experimental approach," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 67-83.
    14. Dalal, Pamela & Chen, Yali & Ravulaparthy, Srinath & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2011. "Dynamic Opportunity-Based Multipurpose Accessibility Indicators in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2920x3kw, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Simone Scarpa, 2015. "The impact of income inequality on economic residential segregation: The case of Malmö, 1991–2010," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 906-922, April.
    16. Paul J.M. Van Steen & Piet H. Pellenbarg & Peter D. Groote, 2016. "How Future-Proof are Dutch Cities?," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 654-656, December.
    17. Eva K. Andersson & Torkild Hovde Lyngstad & Bart Sleutjes, 2018. "Comparing Patterns of Segregation in North-Western Europe: A Multiscalar Approach," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(2), pages 151-168, May.
    18. Huub Ploegmakers & Pascal Beckers, 2015. "Evaluating urban regeneration: An assessment of the effectiveness of physical regeneration initiatives on run-down industrial sites in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2151-2169, September.
    19. Gideon Bolt & Ronald Van Kempen & Jan Van Weesep, 2009. "After Urban Restructuring: Relocations And Segregation In Dutch Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 502-518, September.
    20. Manuel B. Aalbers & Ellen Van Beckhoven, 2010. "The Integrated Approach In Neighbourhood Renewal: More Than Just A Philosophy?," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(4), pages 449-461, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.