IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i15p3172-3188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent patterns of built-up urban space growth following post-socialist changes

Author

Listed:
  • Ioan IanoÅŸ

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Igor Sîrodoev

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Gabriel Pascariu

    (Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning, Romania)

  • Geoffrey Henebry

    (South Dakota State University, USA)

Abstract

An important challenge for the research on post-socialist big cities is to identify the mechanisms of their uncontrolled urban space growth. This analysis is focused on the built-up urban space affected by transformations from a centrally planned to a market-based economy. Post-socialist changes in Bucharest are clearly reflected in the dynamics of built-up space. Land cover dynamics were evaluated using spectral mixture analysis of Landsat 5 TM (Thematic Mapper) data to map percent impervious surface area in 1988 and 2010. Change analysis reveals (1) a decrease of built space in central and peri-central areas of Bucharest, (2) an expansion of new residential areas to the south, (3) land fragmentation to the east and southeast, (4) a mixture of densities to the north, and (5) the role of the ring road in spurring recent development. A key challenge facing Bucharest is the disposition and repurposing of the lands covered by old large housing estates and shuttered heavy industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan IanoÅŸ & Igor Sîrodoev & Gabriel Pascariu & Geoffrey Henebry, 2016. "Divergent patterns of built-up urban space growth following post-socialist changes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(15), pages 3172-3188, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:15:p:3172-3188
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015608568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015608568
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015608568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. P. Royston, 1982. "An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 115-124, June.
    2. J. P. Royston, 1982. "The W Test for Normality," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 176-180, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corina TURSIE, 2017. "Culture-Led Urban Regeneration of Industrial Derelict Places. Case study: Paltim Hats Factory of Timisoara - A Cultural Social Enterprise," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 7-23, December.
    2. Alexandru Bănică & Marinela Istrate & Ionel Muntele, 2017. "Challenges for the Resilience Capacity of Romanian Shrinking Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lauren Bin Dong & David E. A. Giles, 2004. "An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Normality," Econometrics Working Papers 0401, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    2. Tomasz Górecki & Lajos Horváth & Piotr Kokoszka, 2020. "Tests of Normality of Functional Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 677-697, December.
    3. Amir Abolhassani & Gale Boyd & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan & James Harner, 2023. "“Is Energy That Different from Labor?” Similarity in Determinants of Intensity for Auto Assembly Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    4. Jurgita Arnastauskaitė & Tomas Ruzgas & Mindaugas Bražėnas, 2021. "A New Goodness of Fit Test for Multivariate Normality and Comparative Simulation Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Ngoc Thien Le & Watit Benjapolakul, 2019. "Evaluation of Contribution of PV Array and Inverter Configurations to Rooftop PV System Energy Yield Using Machine Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Jurgen A. Doornik & Henrik Hansen, 2008. "An Omnibus Test for Univariate and Multivariate Normality," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 70(s1), pages 927-939, December.
    7. Peter Gerbrands & Brigitte Unger & Joras Ferwerda, 2022. "Bilateral responsive regulation and international tax competition: An agent‐based simulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 760-780, July.
    8. Keith Pilbeam & Hamish Preston, 2019. "An Empirical Investigation of the Performance of Japanese Mutual Funds: Skill or Luck?," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Joseph Aharony & Chan†Jane Lin & Martin P. Loeb, 1993. "Initial Public Offerings, Accounting Choices, and Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 61-81, September.
    10. Orgeta Gjermëni, 2017. "Temporal Statistical Analysis of Degree Distributions in an Undirected Landline Phone Call Network Graph Series," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Prăvălie, Remus & Sîrodoev, Igor & Patriche, Cristian & Roșca, Bogdan & Piticar, Adrian & Bandoc, Georgeta & Sfîcă, Lucian & Tişcovschi, Adrian & Dumitraşcu, Monica & Chifiriuc, Carmen & Mănoiu, Valen, 2020. "The impact of climate change on agricultural productivity in Romania. A country-scale assessment based on the relationship between climatic water balance and maize yields in recent decades," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Sebastian Klaudiusz Tomczak, 2021. "Ratio Selection between Six Sectors in the Visegrad Group Using Parametric and Nonparametric ANOVA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Minguez, Ana & Javier Sese, F., 2022. "Why do you want a relationship, anyway? Consent to receive marketing communications and donors’ willingness to engage with nonprofits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 356-367.
    14. Hazzar Habbib & Julien Verzeaux & Elodie Nivelle & David Roger & Jérôme Lacoux & Manuella Catterou & Bertrand Hirel & Frédéric Dubois & Thierry Tétu, 2016. "Conversion to No-Till Improves Maize Nitrogen Use Efficiency in a Continuous Cover Cropping System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    15. V.A. Byvshev & N.E. Brovkina, 2018. "Credit Market and Economic Growth of Russia: Modeling Mutual Influence," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 622-636.
    16. Owusu Benjamin, 2021. "Fiscal Sustainability Hypothesis Test in Central and Eastern Europe: A Panel Data Perspective," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 8(55), pages 285-312, January.
    17. Lada, Emily K. & Wilson, James R., 2006. "A wavelet-based spectral procedure for steady-state simulation analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1769-1801, November.
    18. Gustavo Castilho Beruski & Luis Miguel Schiebelbein & André Belmont Pereira, 2020. "Maize Yield Components as Affected by Plant Population, Planting Date and Soil Coverings in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    19. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:622-636 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Anthony Medford & James W. Vaupel, 2020. "Extremes are not normal: a reminder to demographers," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 91-106, March.
    21. Wangli Xu & Yanwen Li & Dawo Song, 2013. "Testing normality in mixed models using a transformation method," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 71-84, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:15:p:3172-3188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.