IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i12p2530-2547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of land supply and affordable housing: Auckland’s Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Murphy

Abstract

Increasingly, planning for housing development involves political conflict between local government planning practices, based on urban sustainability and housing intensification, and central government housing policies, centred on land supply and housing affordability. This paper examines a key historical moment in the politics of housing supply and planning in New Zealand. Drawing upon a discourse analysis of a range of housing policy documents and urban plans, this paper traces the dynamic of local and central government negotiations and conflict arising from the development of Auckland’s spatial plan, the development of the Auckland Housing Accord (a central and local government agreement to fast-track planning permission for new housing) and the implementation of the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act. The paper focuses on the manner in which certain policy knowledge is prioritised and applied in the construction of affordable housing policies and how this process, which is presented as objective evidence-based policy formation, is inherently political. It is argued that the legislation supporting housing accords alters central/local government power relations and represents a challenge to the existing planning system.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Murphy, 2016. "The politics of land supply and affordable housing: Auckland’s Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2530-2547, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:12:p:2530-2547
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015594574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015594574
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015594574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron Parsell & Suzanne Fitzpatrick & Volker Busch-Geertsema, 2014. "Common Ground in Australia: An Object Lesson in Evidence Hierarchies and Policy Transfer," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 69-87, January.
    2. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2013. "Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 381-407, December.
    3. Paul Cheshire, 2008. "Reflections on the nature and policy implications of planning restrictions on housing supply. Discussion of 'Planning policy, planning practice, and housing supply' by Kate Barker," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 50-58, spring.
    4. Laurence Murphy, 2014. "'Houston, we've got a problem': The Political Construction of a Housing Affordability Metric in New Zealand," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 893-909, October.
    5. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2013. "Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 381-407, December.
    6. Hal Pawson & Kath Hulse, 2011. "Policy Transfer of Choice-based Lettings to Britain and Australia: How Extensive? How Faithful? How Appropriate?," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 113-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linlin Zhao & Jasper Mbachu & Zhansheng Liu, 2019. "Exploring the Trend of New Zealand Housing Prices to Support Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Renee Gordon & Francis L. Collins & Robin Kearns, 2017. "‘It is the People that Have Made Glen Innes’: State-led Gentrification and the Reconfiguration of Urban Life in Auckland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 767-785, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Phibbs & Nicole Gurran, 2021. "The role and significance of planning in the determination of house prices in Australia: Recent policy debates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(3), pages 457-479, May.
    2. Katrina Raynor & Severine Mayere & Tony Matthews, 2018. "Do ‘city shapers’ really support urban consolidation? The case of Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1056-1075, April.
    3. Korthals Altes, Willem K., 2019. "Planning initiative: Promoting development by the use of options in Amsterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-21.
    4. Murray, Cameron K., 2020. "Time is money: How landbanking constrains housing supply," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    5. Niedziałkowski, Krzysztof & Beunen, Raoul, 2019. "The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-20.
    6. Julie Pollard, 2023. "The political conditions of the rise of real-estate developers in French housing policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 274-291, March.
    7. Khandakar Farid Uddin & Awais Piracha, 2023. "Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Alex Lord & Philip O’Brien, 2017. "What price planning? Reimagining planning as “market maker”," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 217-232, April.
    9. Flanagan, Kathleen & Martin, Chris & Jacobs, Keith & Lawson, Julie & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2019. "A conceptual analysis of social housing as infrastructure," SocArXiv wmuc4, Center for Open Science.
    10. Taha H Rashidi & Milad Ghasri, 2019. "A competing survival analysis for housing relocation behaviour and risk aversion in a resilient housing market," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 122-142, January.
    11. Murray, Cameron, 2019. "The Australian housing supply myth," OSF Preprints r925z, Center for Open Science.
    12. Easthope, Hazel & Palmer, Jasmine & Sharam, Andrea & Nethercote, Megan & Pignatta, Gloria & Crommelin, Laura, 2023. "Delivering sustainable apartment housing: New build and retrofit," SocArXiv z6yn4, Center for Open Science.
    13. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    14. Donald Leffers & Gerda R Wekerle, 2020. "Land developers as institutional and postpolitical actors: Sites of power in land use policy and planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 318-336, March.
    15. Ji, Qiang & Marfatia, Hardik & Gupta, Rangan, 2018. "Information spillover across international real estate investment trusts: Evidence from an entropy-based network analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 103-113.
    16. Liu, Wen & Beattie, Lee & Haarhoff, Errol, 2021. "Outcome-focused plan discretion for facilitating residential intensification: Exploring the insights and experience of property developers and planners," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Nicolas Lewis & Laurence Murphy, 2015. "Anchor organisations in Auckland: Rolling constructively with neoliberalism?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(1), pages 98-118, February.
    18. Levin, Iris & Tually, Selina & De Vries, Jacqueline & Kollmann, Trevor & Stone, Wendy & Goodwin-Smith, Ian, 2023. "Innovations in stock matching and allocations: the social housing challenge," SocArXiv zf48k, Center for Open Science.
    19. Henry Overman & Patricia Rice & Anthony Venables, 2010. "Economic Linkages across Space," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 17-33.
    20. Peter Neuteboom & Dirk Brounen, 2011. "Assessing the Accessibility of the Homeownership Market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(11), pages 2231-2248, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:12:p:2530-2547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.