IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v29y2014i7p893-909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Houston, we've got a problem': The Political Construction of a Housing Affordability Metric in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Murphy

Abstract

Since the global financial crisis, housing affordability has assumed increased policy significance in a number of countries around the world. At a national level, housing policy formation is subject to certain path dependency processes and embedded institutional structures. In this paper, I argue that housing policy formation in New Zealand is increasingly subject to global flows of policy ideas and that the development of new housing affordability policies draws upon networks of global policy agents, housing experts and private consultants. In particular, this research examines the manner in which a US-based private consultant's metric of housing affordability, and analysis of the causes of housing unaffordability, has been incorporated into policy-making and new legislation in New Zealand.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Murphy, 2014. "'Houston, we've got a problem': The Political Construction of a Housing Affordability Metric in New Zealand," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 893-909, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:29:y:2014:i:7:p:893-909
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2014.915291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2014.915291
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2014.915291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cameron Johnson & Tom Baker & Francis L Collins, 2019. "Imaginations of post-suburbia: Suburban change and imaginative practices in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 1042-1060, April.
    2. Nicolas Lewis & Laurence Murphy, 2015. "Anchor organisations in Auckland: Rolling constructively with neoliberalism?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(1), pages 98-118, February.
    3. Katrina Raynor & Severine Mayere & Tony Matthews, 2018. "Do ‘city shapers’ really support urban consolidation? The case of Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1056-1075, April.
    4. Iain White, 2020. "Rigour and rigour mortis? Planning, calculative rationality, and forces of stability and change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2885-2900, November.
    5. Laurence Murphy, 2016. "The politics of land supply and affordable housing: Auckland’s Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2530-2547, September.
    6. Zhu, Jin & Pawson, Hal & Han, Hoon & Li, Bingqin, 2022. "How can spatial planning influence housing market dynamics in a pro-growth planning regime? A case study of Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Quintin Bradley, 2022. "The accountancy of marketisation: Fictional markets in housing land supply," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 493-507, May.
    8. Peter Phibbs & Nicole Gurran, 2021. "The role and significance of planning in the determination of house prices in Australia: Recent policy debates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(3), pages 457-479, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:29:y:2014:i:7:p:893-909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.