IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v46y2009i9p1925-1949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property Rights Redistribution, Entitlement Failure and the Impoverishment of Landless Farmers in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shenjing He

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China, shenjing.he@gmail.com)

  • Yuting Liu

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, ytliu@scut.edu.cn)

  • Chris Webster

    (School of City and Regional Planning, University of Cardiff, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WA, UK, webster@cardiff.ac.uk)

  • Fulong Wu

    (School of City and Regional Planning, University of Cardiff, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WA, UK, WuF@cardiff.ac.uk)

Abstract

Within the process of urban expansion through land requisition in China, farmers' de facto rights to collective land, including farmland and housing plots ( zhaijidi ), are forcibly acquired by the state and thereafter redistributed to private developers, to facilitate urban-based economic growth. Deprived of a secure livelihood, some landless farmers become trapped in poverty. Others find that the property rights restructuring in urbanised villages gives them an opportunity to earn rental income. However, the opportunities are not equally distributed and the processes are, in general, stacked against the interests of villagers. This paper analyses the impoverishment of farmers caught up in China's relentless urban expansion programme, using the perspectives of property rights and entitlements. It presents case studies of two villages in Xi'an to illustrate how farmers' entitlement sets and vulnerability to poverty have changed as a result of changes in land rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenjing He & Yuting Liu & Chris Webster & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Property Rights Redistribution, Entitlement Failure and the Impoverishment of Landless Farmers in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(9), pages 1925-1949, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:9:p:1925-1949
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009106015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009106015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009106015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, Peter, 2005. "Institutions in Transition: Land Ownership, Property Rights, and Social Conflict in China," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199280698.
    2. Banner, Stuart, 2002. "Transitions between Property Regimes," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 359-371, June.
    3. Anderson, Terry L & Hill, Peter J, 2002. "Cowboys and Contracts," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 489-514, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongchun Yang & Deli Zhang & Qingmin Meng & Corrin McCarn, 2015. "Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Guoliang Xu & Yi Li & Iain Hay & Xiuqing Zou & Xiaosong Tu & Baoqiang Wang, 2019. "Beyond Place Attachment: Land Attachment of Resettled Farmers in Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Ling Hin Li, 2015. "State or market: the role of the government in urban village regeneration in China," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 157-167, July.
    4. Hoang Linh Nguyen & Jin Duan & Guo Qin Zhang, 2018. "Land Politics under Market Socialism: The State, Land Policies, and Rural–Urban Land Conversion in China and Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Zhiyong Yi & Guiwen Liu & Wei Lang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2017. "Strategic Approaches to Sustainable Urban Renewal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Lu Zhang & Hongru Du & Yannan Zhao, 2016. "Game Behavior Analysis between the Local Government and Land-Lost Peasants in the Urbanization Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongchun Yang & Deli Zhang & Qingmin Meng & Corrin McCarn, 2015. "Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Daniel Fitzpatrick & Rebecca Monson, 2022. "Property rights and climate migration: Adaptive governance in the South Pacific," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 519-535, April.
    3. Ilia Murtazashvili & Jennifer Murtazashvili, 2015. "Anarchy, self-governance, and legal titling," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 287-305, March.
    4. Annette M. Kim, 2011. "Introduction: Real Rights to the City—Cases of Property Rights Changes towards Equity in Eastern Asia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 459-469, February.
    5. Livia Navone, 2013. "Property versus political holdouts: the case of the TGV rail line Lyon–Budapest in Italy," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 409-426, June.
    6. Xianlei Ma & Justus Wesseler & Nico Heerink & Futian Qu, 2013. "Land Tenure Reforms and Land Conservation Investments in China ¨C What Does Real Option Value Theory Tell Us?," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 3, pages 19-33, August.
    7. Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2021. "On a stakeholder model of corporate governance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(2), pages 321-343, June.
    8. Ran Liu & Tai-Chee Wong & Shenghe Liu, 2012. "Peasants' Counterplots against the State Monopoly of the Rural Urbanization Process: Urban Villages and ‘Small Property Housing’ in Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1219-1240, May.
    9. Weiwei Wang & Lihua Zhou & Guojing Yang & Yan Sun & Yong Chen, 2019. "Prohibited Grazing Policy Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in Rural Northwest China—A Case Study in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Skarbek, David, 2012. "Prison gangs, norms, and organizations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 96-109.
    11. Kevin Guerin, 2004. "Theory vs Reality: Making Environmental Use Rights Work in New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 04/06, New Zealand Treasury.
    12. Xu Guangdong, 2013. "Property Rights, Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 117-142, July.
    13. Mwangi, Esther, 2006. "Subdividing the commons: the politics of property rights transformation in Kenya's Maasailand," CAPRi working papers 46, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Norman Long & Jinlong Liu, 2009. "The Centrality of Actors and Interfaces in the Understanding of New Ruralities: A Chinese Case Study," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 38(4), pages 63-84.
    15. von Wangenheim Georg, 2011. "Evolutionary Theories in Law and Economics and Their Use for Comparative Legal Theory," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 737-765, December.
    16. Roberto Fanfani & Nica Claudia Calò, 2011. "Rural Areas and Agricultural Holdings in China: What Has Changed Within Ten Years from the 1996 to the 2006?," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, December.
    17. Harris,Colin & Cai,Meina & Murtazashvili,Ilia & Murtazashvili,Jennifer Brick, 2020. "The Origins and Consequences of Property Rights," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108969055, October.
    18. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Patterns of revenue distribution in rural residential land consolidation in contemporary China: The perspective of property rights delineation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Zhiming Cheng, 2012. "The changing and different patterns of urban redevelopment in China: a study of three inner-city neighborhoods," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 430-450, July.
    20. Daniel Abramson, 2011. "Transitional Property Rights and Local Developmental History in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 553-568, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:9:p:1925-1949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.