IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v43y2006i12p2163-2182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place, Class and Local Circuits of Reproduction: Exploring the Social Geography of Middle-class Childcare in London

Author

Listed:
  • Linda McDowell

    (School of Geography, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OXI 3QY, UK, linda.mcdowell@ouce.ox.ac.uk.)

  • Kevin Ward

    (School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK, k.g.ward@man.ac.uk.)

  • Diane Perrons

    (Gender Institute, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2 2AE, UK, d.perrons@lse.ac.uk)

  • Kath Ray

    (Policy Studies Institute, 50 Hanson Street, London, WIW 6UP, UK, kath.ray@psi.org.uk)

  • Colette Fagan

    (Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK, colette.fagan@manche.rter.ac.uk)

Abstract

In a recent revival of the older tradition of community studies, sociologists and geographers have begun to address the changing nature of attachment to locality in contemporary cities in advanced industrial societies. Challenging older definitions of attachment to place, a new form of communal attachment has recently been identified, termed 'elective belonging'. This sense of place is particularly important among the middle classes and is, it is argued, closely associated with the growing significance of reproduction, especially access to schooling, as a key part of the reasons for choosing to live in a particular urban neighbourhood. Sociologists of education have also argued that school choice is important. A recent paper has suggested that pre-school childcare also figures in locational choices and in urban differentiation, leading to different traditions of caring/mothering in different neighbourhoods in London. This paper critically assesses these arguments about school and childcare choices and the associated development of place-based middle-class cultures. Based on an empirical study in three London neighbourhoods, it explores the extent to which occupational position and sector of employment-class-based factors-as well as place-based factors continue to play a key role in the types of opportunities and choices that middle-class households make about childcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda McDowell & Kevin Ward & Diane Perrons & Kath Ray & Colette Fagan, 2006. "Place, Class and Local Circuits of Reproduction: Exploring the Social Geography of Middle-class Childcare in London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(12), pages 2163-2182, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:12:p:2163-2182
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980600936509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980600936509
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980600936509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Hamnett, 2003. "Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2401-2426, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cansong Li & Xuebo Zhang & Ian G. Baird & Juncheng Dai, 2018. "Community Heritage Linking Place and Mobility: A Case Study of “Bangbei” in Ethnic Bai Villages of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Manuel ABRANTES, 2014. "What about the numbers? A quantitative contribution to the study of domestic services in Europe," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(2), pages 223-243, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    2. Rowland Atkinson, 2006. "Padding the Bunker: Strategies of Middle-class Disaffiliation and Colonisation in the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 819-832, April.
    3. Tim Winke, 2021. "Housing affordability sets us apart: The effect of rising housing prices on relocation behaviour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2389-2404, September.
    4. Markus Moos & Pablo Mendez, 2015. "Suburban ways of living and the geography of income: How homeownership, single-family dwellings and automobile use define the metropolitan social space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1864-1882, August.
    5. Soyoung Han & Cermetrius Lynell Bohannon & Yoonku Kwon, 2021. "Degentrification? Different Aspects of Gentrification before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Rosemary D. F. Bromley & Andrew R. Tallon & Colin J. Thomas, 2005. "City Centre Regeneration through Residential Development: Contributing to Sustainability," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2407-2429, December.
    7. Nadja Kabisch & Dagmar Haase & Annegret Haase, 2010. "Evolving Reurbanisation? Spatio-temporal Dynamics as Exemplified by the East German City of Leipzig," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 967-990, May.
    8. Sako Musterd & Wouter PC van Gent & Marjolijn Das & Jan Latten, 2016. "Adaptive behaviour in urban space: Residential mobility in response to social distance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 227-246, February.
    9. Xu, Hangtian, 2019. "The burst of the real estate bubble as a promoter of gentrification in Tokyo and Osaka, 1980–2017," MPRA Paper 96803, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Christoph Stich & Emmanouil Tranos & Max Nathan, 2023. "Modeling clusters from the ground up: A web data approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 244-267, January.
    11. John McDonagh, 2013. "Gentrification Interrupted: Impacts of the Christchurch Earthquakes on Inner City Revitalisation," ERES eres2013_40, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    12. Tim Butler & Chris Hamnett & Mark Ramsden, 2008. "Inward and Upward: Marking Out Social Class Change in London, 1981—2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(1), pages 67-88, January.
    13. Jonathan Reades & Jordan De Souza & Phil Hubbard, 2019. "Understanding urban gentrification through machine learning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 922-942, April.
    14. Juan Uribe-Toril & José Luis Ruiz-Real & Jaime De Pablo Valenciano, 2018. "Gentrification as an Emerging Source of Environmental Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Patrick Rérat, 2012. "The New Demographic Growth of Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1107-1125, April.
    16. Chris Hamnett, 2021. "The changing social structure of global cities: Professionalisation, proletarianisation or polarisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 1050-1066, April.
    17. John Meligrana & Andrejs Skaburskis, 2005. "Extent, Location and Profiles of Continuing Gentrification in Canadian Metropolitan Areas, 1981-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(9), pages 1569-1592, August.
    18. Fransham, Mark, 2020. "Neighbourhood gentrification, displacement, and poverty dynamics in post-recession England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103905, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Lai, Yani & Tang, Bosin & Chen, Xiangsheng & Zheng, Xian, 2021. "Spatial determinants of land redevelopment in the urban renewal processes in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. Elvin Wyly & Kathe Newman & Alex Schafran & Elizabeth Lee, 2010. "Displacing New York," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2602-2623, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:12:p:2163-2182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.