IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i13p2407-2429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City Centre Regeneration through Residential Development: Contributing to Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary D. F. Bromley

    (Department of Geography, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK, r.d.f.bromley@swansea.ac.uk)

  • Andrew R. Tallon

    (Faculty of the Built Environment, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 IQY, UK, andrew.tallon@uwe.ac.uk)

  • Colin J. Thomas

    (Department of Geography, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK, c.j.thomas@swansea.ac.uk)

Abstract

Following a discussion of recent policies for the city centre in Britain, the paper explores the contribution of residential development to aspects of sustainability, drawing on a range of survey evidence in Bristol and Swansea. The residents are frequent shoppers, helping to sustain the local daytime economy. Sustainability goals are also supported because large proportions of residents walk to city centre attractions, and many also to their places of work, showing reduced reliance on the private car. Support for the expanding nighttime economy reflects the age, gender and social class composition of the resident population, with different attractions receiving different levels of support from different social groups, but with younger adults as the mainstay. Sustainability in the city centre context appears best served by a majority of young adult residents, ameliorated by a sizeable proportion of older adults, and an absence of households with children. Grandiose government sustainability aims of creating the truly balanced community which includes many children, should be modified in this local context.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary D. F. Bromley & Andrew R. Tallon & Colin J. Thomas, 2005. "City Centre Regeneration through Residential Development: Contributing to Sustainability," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2407-2429, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:13:p:2407-2429
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500379537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500379537
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500379537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Schwanen & Martin Dijst & Frans M Dieleman, 2002. "A Microlevel Analysis of Residential Context and Travel Time," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1487-1507, August.
    2. Anne Power, 2004. "Sustainable communities and sustainable development: A review of the Sustainable Communities Plan," CASE Reports casereport23, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. Maria Manta Conroy & Philip R Berke, 2004. "What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors That Influence Principles of Sustainable Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(8), pages 1381-1396, August.
    4. Neil Ravenscroft & Jo Reeves & Martha Rowley, 2000. "Leisure, Property, and the Viability of Town Centres," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1359-1374, August.
    5. Chris Hamnett, 2003. "Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2401-2426, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taozhi Zhuang & Queena K. Qian & Henk J. Visscher & Marja G. Elsinga, 2017. "Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Woongkyoo Bae & UnHyo Kim & Jeongwoo Lee, 2019. "Evaluation of the Criteria for Designating Maintenance Districts in Low-Rise Residential Areas: Urban Renewal Projects in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Zhiyong Yi & Guiwen Liu & Wei Lang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2017. "Strategic Approaches to Sustainable Urban Renewal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Jungwon Yoon & Jihye Lee, 2019. "Adaptive Reuse of Apartments as Heritage Assets in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, June.
    5. Jagarajan, Rehmaashini & Abdullah Mohd Asmoni, Mat Naim & Mohammed, Abdul Hakim & Jaafar, Mohd Nadzri & Lee Yim Mei, Janice & Baba, Maizan, 2017. "Green retrofitting – A review of current status, implementations and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1360-1368.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    2. Scheiner, Joachim, 2010. "Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 679-690.
    3. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    4. Van Acker, Veronique & Witlox, Frank, 2010. "Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 65-74.
    5. Zidan Mao & Dick Ettema & Martin Dijst, 2018. "Analysis of travel time and mode choice shift for non-work stops in commuting: case study of Beijing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 751-766, May.
    6. Linda McDowell & Kevin Ward & Diane Perrons & Kath Ray & Colette Fagan, 2006. "Place, Class and Local Circuits of Reproduction: Exploring the Social Geography of Middle-class Childcare in London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(12), pages 2163-2182, November.
    7. Rowland Atkinson, 2006. "Padding the Bunker: Strategies of Middle-class Disaffiliation and Colonisation in the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 819-832, April.
    8. Ian Shuttleworth & Chris Lloyd, 2005. "Analysing average travel-to-work distances in Northern Ireland using the 1991 census of population: The effects of locality, social composition, and religion," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 909-921.
    9. Tim Winke, 2021. "Housing affordability sets us apart: The effect of rising housing prices on relocation behaviour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2389-2404, September.
    10. Jianxi Feng & Martin Dijst & Jan Prillwitz & Bart Wissink, 2013. "Travel Time and Distance in International Perspective: A Comparison between Nanjing (China) and the Randstad (The Netherlands)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(14), pages 2993-3010, November.
    11. Sagi, Alon & Gal, Avigdor & Broitman, Dani & Czamanski, Daniel, 2024. "An unsupervised machine learning approach to the spatial analysis of urban systems through neighbourhoods’ dynamics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Markus Moos & Pablo Mendez, 2015. "Suburban ways of living and the geography of income: How homeownership, single-family dwellings and automobile use define the metropolitan social space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1864-1882, August.
    13. Fang He & Wendong Wu & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2019. "Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Soyoung Han & Cermetrius Lynell Bohannon & Yoonku Kwon, 2021. "Degentrification? Different Aspects of Gentrification before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Foster, Michaela & Peterson, M. Nils & Cubbage, Frederick & McMahon, Gerard, 2019. "Evaluating natural resource planning for longleaf pine ecosystems in the Southeast United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 142-153.
    16. Kim, Jinhee & de Leeuw, Evelyne & Harris-Roxas, Ben & Sainsbury, Peter, 2023. "Five urban health research traditions: A meta-narrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    17. Pitombo, C.S. & Kawamoto, E. & Sousa, A.J., 2011. "An exploratory analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 347-357, March.
    18. Nadja Kabisch & Dagmar Haase & Annegret Haase, 2010. "Evolving Reurbanisation? Spatio-temporal Dynamics as Exemplified by the East German City of Leipzig," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 967-990, May.
    19. Sako Musterd & Wouter PC van Gent & Marjolijn Das & Jan Latten, 2016. "Adaptive behaviour in urban space: Residential mobility in response to social distance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 227-246, February.
    20. Carse, Andrew & Goodman, Anna & Mackett, Roger L. & Panter, Jenna & Ogilvie, David, 2013. "The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 67-74.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:13:p:2407-2429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.