IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v40y2003i8p1517-1548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access to Water for the Urban Poor in Cape Town: Where Equity Meets Cost Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Laila Smith

    (Centre for Policy Studies, PO Box 16488, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa, laila@cps.org.za)

  • Susan Hanson

    (School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA, shanson@clarku.edu)

Abstract

Local authorities in South Africa have responded to the post-apartheid promise of redistribution and democratisation by adopting market principles in the delivery of essential services. This article examines a five-year period (1997-2001) of intense local government restructuring in Cape Town, using water distribution as a case study. The focus is upon two cost-recovery policies, underinvestment in infrastructure and water cutoffs, which have been central to a five-year commercialisation process in the water sector. The impact of cost-recovery policies on low-income communities living in the townships is examined in light of the South African government's twin goals of achieving distributional and procedural equity in service delivery. The findings reveal that historical inequities produced through territorial variation in service delivery under apartheid are being recreated through contemporary 'basic needs' approaches and that historically entrenched service debts are leading to widespread water cutoffs (160 000 in 3 years). Both of these cost-recovery policies create local government inefficiencies in the management of water distribution as a public good.

Suggested Citation

  • Laila Smith & Susan Hanson, 2003. "Access to Water for the Urban Poor in Cape Town: Where Equity Meets Cost Recovery," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1517-1548, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:8:p:1517-1548
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000094414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000094414
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098032000094414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shirley, Mary M., 1999. "Bureaucrats in business: The roles of privatization versus corporatization in state-owned enterprise reform," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 115-136, January.
    2. Ivan Turok, 2001. "Persistent Polarisation Post-Apartheid? Progress towards Urban Integration in Cape Town," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2349-2377, December.
    3. Ramamurti, Ravi, 1999. "Why haven't developing countries privatized deeper and faster?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 137-155, January.
    4. Judith A. Rees, 1998. "Regulation and private participation in the water and sanitation sector," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 22(2), pages 95-105, May.
    5. Graham, Stephen & Marvin, Simon, 1994. "Cherry picking and social dumping : Utilities in the 1990s," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 113-119, April.
    6. Klein, Michael, 1996. "Economic regulation of water companies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1649, The World Bank.
    7. Etienne Nel & Tony Binns, 2001. "Initiating 'Developmental Local Government' in South Africa: Evolving Local Economic Development Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 355-362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schwartz, Klaas & Tutusaus, Mireia & Savelli, Elisa, 2017. "Water for the urban poor: Balancing financial and social objectives through service differentiation in the Kenyan water sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 22-31.
    2. Galdo, Virgilio & Briceño, Bertha, 2005. "Evaluating the Impact on Child Mortality of a Water Supply and Sewerage Expansion in Quito: Is Water Enough?," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2833, Inter-American Development Bank.
    3. Tatsuya Makino & Keigo Noda & Keoduangchai Keokhamphui & Hiromasa Hamada & Kazuo Oki & Taikan Oki, 2016. "The Effects of Five Forms of Capital on Thought Processes Underlying Water Consumption Behavior in Suburban Vientiane," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Yates, Julian S. & Harris, Leila M., 2018. "Hybrid regulatory landscapes: The human right to water, variegated neoliberal water governance, and policy transfer in Cape Town, South Africa, and Accra, Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 75-87.
    5. Wilson, Adam M. & Latimer, Andrew M. & Silander, John A. & Gelfand, Alan E. & de Klerk, Helen, 2010. "A Hierarchical Bayesian model of wildfire in a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot: Implications of weather variability and global circulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 106-112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Dubresson, 2005. "Monopolisation institutionnelle et spatialités économiques au Cap (Afrique du Sud)," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(181), pages 21-44.
    2. Narjess Boubakri & Jean-Claude Cosset & Omrance Guedhami, 2001. "Liberalization, Corporate Governance, and the Performance of Newly Privatized Firms," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 419, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    3. Francis,David C. & Kubinec ,Robert, 2022. "Beyond Political Connections : A Measurement Model Approach to Estimating Firm-levelPolitical Influence in 41 Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10119, The World Bank.
    4. repec:dgr:rugsom:01a21 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Tingting He & Paul R. Jackson, 2015. "Empirical Study of Trust in Chinese Organizations: Joint Venture versus State-Owned Enterprise," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 139-166, June.
    6. Reto Foellmi & Urs Meister, 2012. "Enhancing the Efficiency of Water Supply—Product Market Competition Versus Trade," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 299-324, September.
    7. Mico APOSTOLOV, 2016. "Ownership And Control Structures A Case Study," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 23-37, June.
    8. Andrea Pollio, 2020. "Architectures of millennial development: Entrepreneurship and spatial justice at the bottom of the pyramid in Cape Town," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 573-592, May.
    9. Howden-Chapman, Philippa & Viggers, Helen & Chapman, Ralph & O'Dea, Des & Free, Sarah & O'Sullivan, Kimberley, 2009. "Warm homes: Drivers of the demand for heating in the residential sector in New Zealand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3387-3399, September.
    10. Hunt, Chris & Bui, Binh & Fowler, Carolyn, 2008. "A Risk-focused Performance Management System Framework for Planning Change in Organisations: New Zealand 'Gentailers' and the ETS," Working Paper Series 4013, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    11. Herrera Dappe, Matías & Musacchio, Aldo & Turkgulu, Burak & Pan, Carolina & Barboza, Jonathan & Semikolenova, Yadviga, 2024. "State-owned enterprises as countercyclical instruments: Quasi-experimental evidence from the infrastructure sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Vivian Bickford‐Smith, 2010. "The Fairest Cape of Them All? Cape Town in Cinematic Imagination," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 92-114, March.
    13. Covadonga Meseguer, 2005. "Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 67-82, March.
    14. repec:dgr:rugsom:02a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Zizzamia, Rocco, 2020. "Is employment a panacea for poverty? A mixed-methods investigation of employment decisions in South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    16. López-Bonilla, Jesús Manuel & López-Bonilla, Luis Miguel, 2008. "Influence of the state-owned airlines on passenger satisfaction," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 143-145.
    17. Sun, Qunyan & Zhang, Anming & Li, Jie, 2005. "A study of optimal state shares in mixed oligopoly: Implications for SOE reform and foreign competition," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27.
    18. Devine-Wright, Patrick & Devine-Wright, Hannah & Sherry-Brennan, Fionnguala, 2010. "Visible technologies, invisible organisations: An empirical study of public beliefs about electricity supply networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4127-4134, August.
    19. Bert Willems & Juulia Zhou, 2020. "The Clean Energy Package and Demand Response: Setting Correct Incentives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Mr. Jacques A Miniane & Ezequiel Cabezon & Mr. Sebastian Weber & Christine J. Richmond & Ms. Dora Benedek & Mr. James Roaf & Mr. Francisco J Parodi & Mr. Peter Dohlman & Rima Turk & Bobana Cegar & Mic, 2019. "Reassessing the Role of State-Owned Enterprises in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe," IMF Departmental Papers / Policy Papers 2019/010, International Monetary Fund.
    21. Oseni, Musiliu O., 2015. "Assessing the consumers’ willingness to adopt a prepayment metering system in Nigeria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 154-165.
    22. Reto Foellmi & Urs Meister, 2005. "Product-Market Competition in the Water Industry: Voluntary Non-discriminatory Pricing," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 115-135, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:8:p:1517-1548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.