IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i4p643-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Tenant Profile of Dutch Social Rented Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Veronique A. J. M. Schutjens

    (Urban Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, V.Schutjens@geog.uu.nl)

  • Ronald van Kempen

    (Urban Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, R.vanKempen@geog.uunl)

  • Jan van Weesep

    (Urban Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, J.vanWeesep@geog.uu.nl)

Abstract

This article deals with the changes in the tenant profile of the social rented stock in the Netherlands. It is inspired by the question whether the sector may be subject to a residualisation trend. The wider importance of such a phenomenon is that of the social marginalisation of the people concerned in general. Moreover, if the position of the social rented stock can be shown to be deteriorating, it would also illustrate a tendency to social polarisation in the redefined welfare state. Social and income polarisation in Western societies has been extensively investigated but, so far, polarisation tendencies in housing have largely been ignored. This article seeks to show that this omission should be rectified because changes in tenant profiles reveal wider developments. It also aims to uncover the impact of policy in this respect. The analysis of the changing position of the social rented sector during the period leading up to and following the housing policy reform of 1989 constitutes the core of the paper. The aim of that policy change was to improve the match between the tenants' ability to pay and the cost of housing as a means of reducing the burden of rent subsidies on the state. The reform has been hailed as an example of the effectiveness of policy-making. However, the analysis shows that the role of the social rented sector had already been shifting during the 1980s, well before the announcement of the overhaul of housing policy. This result illustrates that policy may simply codify decisions made in a network of actors rather than initiate change on its own accord.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronique A. J. M. Schutjens & Ronald van Kempen & Jan van Weesep, 2002. "The Changing Tenant Profile of Dutch Social Rented Housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 643-664, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:4:p:643-664
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980220119507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980220119507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980220119507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Sarkissian, 1976. "The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 231-246, October.
    2. Chris Hamnett, 1994. "Social Polarisation in Global Cities: Theory and Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 401-424, April.
    3. Hughes, Mark Alan & Madden, Janice Fanning, 1991. "Residential segregation and the economic status of black workers: New evidence for an old debate," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 28-49, January.
    4. Chris Hamnett, 1984. "Housing the Two Nations: Socio-Tenurial Polarization in England and Wales, 1961-81," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 389-405, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan Murie & Sako Musterd, 1996. "Social Segregation, Housing Tenure and Social Change in Dutch Cities in the Late 1980s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 495-516, April.
    2. Ronald van Kempen & A. şule Özüekren, 1998. "Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1631-1656, October.
    3. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    4. Grzegorczyk Anna, 2021. "Residential segregation and socio-spatial processes in Marseille. Urban social sustainability challenge," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 52(52), pages 25-38, June.
    5. ziye na & Mingwei Liu, 2012. "Spatial Transformation in Shanghai: the strategy, institutional arrangement and planning procedures - the case of EXPO 2010," ERSA conference papers ersa12p889, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Renato A. Orozco Pereira & Ben Derudder, 2010. "Determinants of Dynamics in the World City Network, 2000-2004," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(9), pages 1949-1967, August.
    7. Shengyi Gao & Patricia Mokhtarian & Robert Johnston, 2008. "Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(2), pages 341-356, June.
    8. Jago Dodson & Neil Sipe, 2007. "Oil Vulnerability in the Australian City: Assessing Socioeconomic Risks from Higher Urban Fuel Prices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 37-62, January.
    9. Zwiers, Merle & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 8882, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Chih Hoong Sin, 2002. "The Quest for a Balanced Ethnic Mix: Singapore's Ethnic Quota Policy Examined," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1347-1374, July.
    11. Taylor, Brian D. & Ong, Paul M., 1993. "Racial and Ethnic Variations in Employment Access: An Examination of Residential Location and Commuting in Metropolitan Areas," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3z30725t, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Peter Congdon & John Shepherd, 1988. "Components of Social Change in Urban Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 173-189, June.
    13. Neumann, Uwe & Schaffner, Sandra & Eilers, Lea, 2019. "Bedeutung finanzieller Grundkompetenzen aus regionaler Perspektive. Gefördert durch die Dr. Josef und Brigitte Pauli-Stiftung," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 222358, March.
    14. Jeroen van der Waal, 2013. "Foreign Direct Investment and International Migration to Dutch Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(2), pages 294-311, February.
    15. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    16. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    17. Giuliano, Genevieve & Small, Kenneth A., 1993. "Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2ss7x5b1, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. Thomas Maloutas & Hugo Botton, 2021. "Trends of Social Polarisation and Segregation in Athens (1991–2011)," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 117-128.
    19. Jacqueline Borel-Saladin & Owen Crankshaw, 2009. "Social Polarisation or Professionalisation? Another Look at Theory and Evidence on Deindustrialisation and the Rise of the Service Sector," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 645-664, March.
    20. Mark Goodwin, 1996. "Governing the Spaces of Difference: Regulation and Globalisation in London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1395-1406, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:4:p:643-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.