IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v24y2018i1p91-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent occupational pensions in Bismarckian countries: the case of Germany and Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Wiß

    (Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Germany
    Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria)

Abstract

Pension reforms and the changing public/private pension mix of the last decades are well documented. However, a more detailed look at the design of occupational pensions reveals remarkable differences even in countries that are usually treated as similar in the literature. Germany and Austria share many similarities and are having to cope with similar reform pressure. However, the design of occupational pensions varies substantially. Why? In Germany, trade unions are regularly involved in occupational pension schemes and benefits are calculated on the basis of defined contributions (DC), but with minimum return guarantees preventing losses in times of financial turmoil. By contrast, trade unions rarely participate in Austrian occupational schemes. In Austria, pure DC schemes without guarantees resulted in heavy occupational pension cuts during the recent financial market crises. Following the method of difference, the article explains this difference by trade union structure, unions’ strategic thinking and (lacking) reform threats supported by employers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Wiß, 2018. "Divergent occupational pensions in Bismarckian countries: the case of Germany and Austria," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 91-107, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:91-107
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258917748258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258917748258
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258917748258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Karen M. & Meyer, Traute, 2003. "Social Democracy, Unions, and Pension Politics in Germany and Sweden," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 23-54, January.
    2. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (ed.), 2011. "The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199586028.
    3. Reinhard Koman & Ulrich Schuh & Andrea Weber, 2005. "The Austrian Severance Pay Reform: Toward a Funded Pension Pillar," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 255-274, September.
    4. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2011:v:37i:3p:373 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Obinger, Herbert & Starke, Peter & Moser, Julia & Bogedan, Claudia & Gindulis, Edith & Leibfried, Stephan, 2010. "Transformations of the Welfare State: Small States, Big Lessons," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199296323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Skevik Grødem & Anniken Hagelund & Jon M Hippe & Christine Trampusch, 2018. "Beyond coverage: the politics of occupational pensions and the role of trade unions. Introduction to special issue," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 9-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J rg Neugschwender, 2014. "Pension Income Inequality: a Cohort Study in Six European Countries," LIS Working papers 618, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    2. J rg Neugschwender, 2015. "Pension Institutions and Income Inequality across European Societies: Denmark, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom," LIS Working papers 627, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    3. Stefanie König, 2017. "Career histories as determinants of gendered retirement timing in the Danish and Swedish pension systems," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 397-406, December.
    4. Said Outlioua & Abdesselam Fazouane, 2023. "Which factors affect the sustainability of pension schemes?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 89-108, February.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:468575 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sarianna M Lundan, 2018. "From the editor: Engaging international business scholars with public policy issues," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Gloria Macassa & Ehsanul Huda Chowdhury & Jesus Barrena-Martinez & Joaquim Soares, 2024. "What Do We Know about Age Management Practices in Public and Private Institutions in Scandinavia?—A Public Health Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Parsons, Donald O., 2010. "The Firing Cost Implications of Alternative Severance Pay Designs," IZA Discussion Papers 4967, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Bernhard Ebbinghaus & Kenneth Nelson & Rense Nieuwenhuis, 2019. "Poverty in Old Age," LIS Working papers 777, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    10. Bernhard Ebbinghaus & Tobias Wiß, 2011. "Taming pension fund capitalism in Europe: collective and state regulation in times of crisis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(1), pages 15-28, February.
    11. Ingo Rohlfing, 2014. "Comparative Hypothesis Testing Via Process Tracing," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 43(4), pages 606-642, November.
    12. repec:ces:ifodic:v:10:y:2012:i:4:p:19074538 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Blank, Florian & Blum, Sonja, 2017. "Kindererziehungszeiten in der Alterssicherung: Ein Vergleich sechs europäischer Länder," WSI Working Papers 209, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    14. Wadensjö, Eskil, 2013. "Labor Market Transparency," IZA Discussion Papers 7658, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Holzmann, Robert & Pouget, Yann & Vodopivec, Milan & Weber, Michael, 2011. "Severance Pay Programs around the World: History, Rationale, Status, and Reforms," IZA Discussion Papers 5731, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Axel West Pedersen & Jon M Hippe & Anne Skevik Grødem & Ole Beier Sørensen, 2018. "Trade unions and the politics of occupational pensions in Denmark and Norway," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 109-122, February.
    17. Kholodilin, Konstantin A. & Kohl, Sebastian & Müller, Florian, 2022. "The rise and fall of social housing? Housing decommodification in long-run perspective," MPIfG Discussion Paper 22/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Sarfati, Hedva. & Ghellab, Youcef., 2012. "The political economy of pension reforms in times of global crisis : state unilateralism or social dialogue?," ILO Working Papers 994685753402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. Anita Wölfl & Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti, 2011. "Reforming the Labour Market in Spain," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 845, OECD Publishing.
    20. Igor Guardiancich & Mattia Guidi, 2016. "Formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: A case of institutional complementarity?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 211-229, September.
    21. Mattia Guidi & Igor Guardiancich, 2018. "Intergovernmental or supranational integration? A quantitative analysis of pension recommendations in the European Semester," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 684-706, December.
    22. J rg Neugschwender, 2011. "Occupational Welfare Policies and Pension Income Inequalities: Case Studies of Pension Systems in Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom," LIS Working papers 561, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:91-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.