IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/toueco/v12y2006i3p347-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labelling and Differentiation Strategy in the Recreational Housing Rental Market of Rural Destinations: The French Case

Author

Listed:
  • M. Rambonilaza

    (CEMAGREF, Agriculture and Dynamics of Rural Areas Unit, 50 avenue de Verdun, F-33612 Bordeaux, France)

Abstract

In France the rural recreational housing rental market is composed of two parts: the market for ‘non-labelled’ lodgings and the market for ‘labelled’ lodgings. Two national federations with branches in each region of France manage the labelled segment. In this article the hedonic price approach is developed (a) to assess the labelling premium in the recreational housing rental market of rural destinations in France and (b) to examine the two federations' differentiation strategies. The author uses a database for the Aveyron region for the summer season of the year 2002. The data for labelled lodgings are drawn from catalogues produced by the labelling federations, and the information for non-labelled accommodation was gathered from local tourism information brochures. The study reveals that labels are indeed valued positively by the market. The labelling premium can reach ₠129 per week in the peak season. Moreover, environmental variables (such as the population density of the commune in which the lodging is located) are the key variables of differentiation in the labelled lodgings market. The results can assist federation managers in defining labelling and pricing strategies. They also point to some new directions for public initiatives to encourage the development of this type of accommodation in rural destinations.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Rambonilaza, 2006. "Labelling and Differentiation Strategy in the Recreational Housing Rental Market of Rural Destinations: The French Case," Tourism Economics, , vol. 12(3), pages 347-359, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:347-359
    DOI: 10.5367/000000006778493619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5367/000000006778493619
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5367/000000006778493619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Tirole, 1996. "A Theory of Collective Reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality)," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 63(1), pages 1-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Romain Craste & Bengt Kriström & Pere Riera, 2014. "Non-market valuation in France: An overview of the research activity," Working Papers hal-01087365, HAL.
    2. de Oliveira Santos, Glauber Eduardo, 2016. "Worldwide hedonic prices of subjective characteristics of hostels," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 451-454.
    3. Jaume Rosselló & Antoni Riera, 2012. "Pricing European Package Tours: The Impact of New Distribution Channels and Low-Cost Airlines," Tourism Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 265-279, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Fleckinger & Matthieu Glachant & Gabrielle Moineville, 2017. "Incentives for Quality in Friendly and Hostile Informational Environments," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 242-274, February.
    2. Paul Pelzl & Steven Poelhekke, 2023. "Democratization, leader education and growth: firm-level evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 571-600, December.
    3. van Hoorn, Andre, 2015. "Organizational Culture in the Financial Sector: Evidence from a Cross-Industry Analysis of Employee Personal Values and Career," MPRA Paper 67222, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Paul A. Grout & Ian Jewitt & Silvia Sonderegger, 2007. "Governance Reform in Legal Service Markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(519), pages 93-113, March.
    5. Hanming Fang, 2024. "Measurements, determinants, causes, and consequences of corruption: lessons from China’s anti-corruption campaign," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(1), pages 3-25, February.
    6. Andersson, Fredrik & Skogh, Goran, 2003. "Quality, self-regulation, and competition: the case of insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 267-280, April.
    7. Nunn, Nathan, 2007. "Historical legacies: A model linking Africa's past to its current underdevelopment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 157-175, May.
    8. Jie Bai, 2016. "Melons as Lemons: Asymmetric Information, Consumer Learning and Seller Reputation," Natural Field Experiments 00540, The Field Experiments Website.
    9. Luca Correani, 2005. "Preferences, Development and Corruption Trap," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 177-200.
    10. Arnold, Ulli & Neubauer, Joerg & Schoenherr, Tobias, 2012. "Explicating factors for companies’ inclination towards corruption in Operations and supply chain management: An exploratory study in Germany," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 136-147.
    11. Günther G. Schulze & Björn Frank, 2003. "Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: Experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 143-160, August.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Matthew O. Jackson, 2015. "History, Expectations, and Leadership in the Evolution of Social Norms," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(2), pages 423-456.
    13. Kofman, Fred & Lawarree, Jacques, 1996. "On the optimality of allowing collusion," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 383-407, September.
    14. Dmitriy Knyazev, 2023. "How to fight corruption: Carrots and sticks," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(2), pages 413-429, April.
    15. Olivier Gergaud & Florine Livat, 2004. "Team versus individual reputations: a model of interaction and some empirical evidence," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques bla04015, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    16. David Hugh-Jones & Ro’i Zultan, 2013. "Reputation and Cooperation in Defense," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 57(2), pages 327-355, April.
    17. Dong, Bin & Dulleck, Uwe & Torgler, Benno, 2012. "Conditional corruption," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 609-627.
    18. Cline, Brandon N. & Walkling, Ralph A. & Yore, Adam S., 2018. "The consequences of managerial indiscretions: Sex, lies, and firm value," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 389-415.
    19. Stéphane Straub, 2000. "Factores determinantes empíricos de las buenas instituciones: ¿sabemos algo a ciencia cierta?," Research Department Publications 4216, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    20. Mikel Berdud & Juan M. Cabasés Hita & Jorge Nieto, 2012. "Motivational Capital and Incentives in Health Care Organisations," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 1209, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:347-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.