IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v44y2015i3p486-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Kenny
  • Burcu Kaniskan
  • D. Betsy McCoach

Abstract

Given that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is currently one of the most popular measures of goodness-of-model fit within structural equation modeling (SEM), it is important to know how well the RMSEA performs in models with small degrees of freedom ( df ). Unfortunately, most previous work on the RMSEA and its confidence interval has focused on models with a large df . Building on the work of Chen et al. to examine the impact of small df on the RMSEA, we conducted a theoretical analysis and a Monte Carlo simulation using correctly specified models with varying df and sample size. The results of our investigation indicate that when the cutoff values are used to assess the fit of the properly specified models with small df and small sample size, the RMSEA too often falsely indicates a poor fitting model. We recommend not computing the RMSEA for small df models, especially those with small sample sizes, but rather estimating parameters that were not originally specified in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Kenny & Burcu Kaniskan & D. Betsy McCoach, 2015. "The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(3), pages 486-507, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:486-507
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124114543236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124114543236
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124114543236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:123-136 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Fei Song & Alex Bitektine, 2018. "Firm Status and Evaluators’ Trust: The Many Ways to Trust a Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 503-518, December.
    3. Costa Synodinos & Kirty-Lee Sharp, 2019. "Are Generation Y students brand loyal to their university? A case of attitude, commitment and trust on student brand loyalty," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9912358, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Jinsoo Park & Hamirahanim Abdul Rahman & Jihae Suh & Hazami Hussin, 2019. "A Study of Integrative Bargaining Model with Argumentation-Based Negotiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Liu, Shan & Wang, Lin & Huang, Wei (Wayne), 2017. "Effects of process and outcome controls on business process outsourcing performance: Moderating roles of vendor and client capability risks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1115-1128.
    6. Tremblay, Michel & Simard, Gilles, 2018. "A multifoci approach to study social support and job performance: A target similarity consideration of development-enhancing practices, leadership, and structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 118-130.
    7. Chen, Tingting & Li, Fuli & Chen, Xiao-Ping & Ou, Zhanying, 2018. "Innovate or die: How should knowledge-worker teams respond to technological turbulence?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Michal Ďuriník & Jakub Procházka & Hynek Cígler, 2018. "The Short Maximization Inventory," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(1), pages 123-136, January.
    9. Walumbwa, Fred O. & Hartnell, Chad A. & Misati, Everlyne, 2017. "Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 14-23.
    10. Veljko Jovanović, 2019. "Evaluation of Domain Satisfaction Measure in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Austria and Four Countries of the Former Yugoslavia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1369-1385, February.
    11. Twardowska-Staszek, Estera & Zych, Izabela & Ortega-Ruiz, Rosario, 2018. "Bullying and cyberbullying in Polish elementary and middle schools: Validation of questionnaires and nature of the phenomena," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 217-225.
    12. Frischkorn, Gidon T. & Schubert, Anna-Lena & Hagemann, Dirk, 2019. "Processing speed, working memory, and executive functions: Independent or inter-related predictors of general intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 95-110.
    13. Tasci, Asli D.A., 2018. "Testing the cross-brand and cross-market validity of a consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) model for destination brands," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 143-159.
    14. Bret Leary, R. & Vann, Richard J. & Mittelstaedt, John D., 2017. "Leading the way: Motivating environmental action through perceived marketplace influence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 79-89.
    15. Boley, B. Bynum & Strzelecka, Marianna, 2016. "Towards a universal measure of “Support for Tourism”," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 238-241.
    16. Koschmann, Anthony & Bowman, Douglas, 2018. "Evaluating marketplace synergies of ingredient brand alliances," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 575-590.
    17. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:486-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.