IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v29y2024i4p1077-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leaping the Abyss: The Problematic Translation of Social Research Results into Policy Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Seweryn Rudnicki

    (AGH University, Poland; University of Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Katarzyna Wojnicka

    (University of Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

This article argues that translating social research findings into policy recommendations may pose a significant methodological and practical challenge. Due to the current emphasis on the ‘third mission’ of universities and the ‘relevance’ of scientific knowledge, it has become more common for sociologists to engage in projects that include the development of social-research-based recommendations. This article analyses empirically an example of such a project – an extensive, European Commission–funded study about the role of men in gender equality in Europe – and shows that developing recommendations may receive lower priority than producing findings, be unguided by any specific method or approach, and operate within an ‘aura of evidence’ rather than a ‘hierarchy of evidence’. Discouraging an all-too-easy criticism, this article argues for more reflection, frameworks, and methods that could support sociologists in the development of research-based guidelines for policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Seweryn Rudnicki & Katarzyna Wojnicka, 2024. "Leaping the Abyss: The Problematic Translation of Social Research Results into Policy Recommendations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(4), pages 1077-1088, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:29:y:2024:i:4:p:1077-1088
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804241228688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804241228688
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804241228688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina Boswell & Katherine Smith, 2017. "Rethinking policy ‘impact’: four models of research-policy relations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Luk Van Langenhove, 2012. "Make social sciences relevant," Nature, Nature, vol. 484(7395), pages 442-442, April.
    3. Peter Fleming, 2020. "Dark Academia: Despair in the Neoliberal Business School," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1305-1311, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henk J. Steinz & Frank J. Van Rijnsoever & Frans Nauta, 2016. "How to Green the red Dragon: A Start‐ups' Little Helper for Sustainable Development in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 593-608, December.
    2. Schüßler, Elke & Lohmeyer, Nora & Ashwin, Sarah, 2022. "We can't compete on human rights: creating market-protected spaces to institutionalize the emerging logic of responsible management," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115506, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Ioana Lupu, 2021. "An autoethnography of pregnancy and birth during Covid times: Transcending the illusio of overwork in academia?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 1898-1911, September.
    4. Frederike Scholz & Joanna Maria Szulc, 2023. "Connected early‐career experiences of equality in academia during the pandemic and beyond: Our liminal journey," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1042-1058, May.
    5. Liela A. Jamjoom, 2022. "Tread lightly: Liminality and Covid‐19 reflections," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1314-1330, July.
    6. Ruth Mayne & Duncan Green & Irene Guijt & Martin Walsh & Richard English & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam’s experience," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Frans W. A. Brom, 2019. "Institutionalizing applied humanities: enabling a stronger role for the humanities in interdisciplinary research for public policy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Shubo Liu & Qiuli Huang & Mengna Lv, 2024. "From vocation to profession: multiple identities of Chinese management academics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Steve Connelly & Dave Vanderhoven & Robert Rutherfoord & Liz Richardson & Peter Matthews, 2021. "Translating research for policy: the importance of equivalence, function, and loyalty," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Sumati Ahuja, 2023. "Professional Identity Threats in Interprofessional Collaborations: A Case of Architects in Professional Service Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 428-453, March.
    11. Megan C Evans & Christopher Cvitanovic, 2018. "An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta, 2021. "The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: A bibliometric perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Lene Topp & David Mair & Laura Smillie & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Jana Zscheischler & Sebastian Rogga & Maria Busse, 2017. "The Adoption and Implementation of Transdisciplinary Research in the Field of Land-Use Science—A Comparative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, October.
    15. James Maccarthy & Suzanne Guerin & Anthony G Wilson & Emma R Dorris, 2019. "Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:29:y:2024:i:4:p:1077-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.