IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v25y2020i4p549-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Efficacy, Group Threat, and Urban Change: Examining Informal Social Control Forces in Areas of Gentrification

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn Kozey

Abstract

Since the term gentrification was first coined in the 1960s, scholars have had an interest in understanding how this process of change can impact neighborhoods. Empirical research focusing on the relationship between gentrification and crime has yielded varying results, with little examination of the contextual mechanisms that may influence the relationship. This research combines data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods with several other sources, and employs multilevel modeling techniques to examine two such contextual mechanisms – collective efficacy and group threat, conceptualized as perceived neighborhood change. The results offer preliminary support for the moderating roles of collective efficacy and perceived neighborhood change mechanisms on the relationship between gentrification and crime. While there is an overall negative association between gentrification and crime, this effect is strengthened with collective efficacy, but reversed with rising levels of perceived neighborhood change.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn Kozey, 2020. "Collective Efficacy, Group Threat, and Urban Change: Examining Informal Social Control Forces in Areas of Gentrification," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(4), pages 549-570, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:25:y:2020:i:4:p:549-570
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780419893554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780419893554
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780419893554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Clark, 1991. "Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Chris Hamnett, 2003. "Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2401-2426, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. AJ Golio, 2024. "Whose Neighborhood Now? Gentrification and Community Life in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods," Working Papers 24-29, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    2. Gandica, Yerali & Gargiulo, Floriana & Carletti, Timoteo, 2016. "Can topology reshape segregation patterns?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 46-54.
    3. Rajiv Sethi & Rohini Somanathan, 2009. "Racial Inequality and Segregation Measures: Some Evidence from the 2000 Census," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 36(2), pages 79-91, June.
    4. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite & Andres Jauregui, 2015. "House Price Impacts Of Racial, Income, Education, And Age Neighborhood Segregation," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 442-467, June.
    5. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2021. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," Papers 2110.05608, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    6. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    7. Abhinav Singh & Dmitri Vainchtein & Howard Weiss, 2009. "Schelling's Segregation Model: Parameters, scaling, and aggregation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(12), pages 341-366.
    8. Chris Hamnett, 2011. "Urban Social Polarization," Chapters, in: Ben Derudder & Michael Hoyler & Peter J. Taylor & Frank Witlox (ed.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities, chapter 32, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Paul M. Torrens, 2016. "Exploring behavioral regions in agents’ mental maps," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 57(2), pages 309-334, November.
    10. Nema Dean & Gwilym Pryce, 2017. "Is the housing market blind to religion? A perceived substitutability approach to homophily and social integration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(13), pages 3058-3070, October.
    11. Roy Cerqueti & Luca De Benedictis & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Segregation with social linkages: Evaluating Schelling’s model with networked individuals," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 384-440, May.
    12. repec:max:cprpbr:003 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Dan Olner & Gwilym Pryce & Maarten van Ham & Heleen Janssen, 2024. "The conflicting geographies of social frontiers: Exploring the asymmetric impacts of social frontiers on household mobility in Rotterdam," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 625-640, March.
    14. Xu, Hangtian, 2020. "Land Price Fluctuations, Commercial-Residential Segregation, and Gentrification," MPRA Paper 98844, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Linda McDowell & Kevin Ward & Diane Perrons & Kath Ray & Colette Fagan, 2006. "Place, Class and Local Circuits of Reproduction: Exploring the Social Geography of Middle-class Childcare in London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(12), pages 2163-2182, November.
    16. Auspurg, Katrin & Hinz, Thomas & Schmid, Laura, 2017. "Contexts and conditions of ethnic discrimination: Evidence from a field experiment in a German housing market," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 26-36.
    17. Itzhak Omer, 2005. "How Ethnicity Influences Residential Distributions: An Agent-Based Simulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(5), pages 657-672, October.
    18. Frankel, David M. & Pauzner, Ady, 2002. "Expectations and the Timing of Neighborhood Change," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 295-314, March.
    19. Samantha Friedman, 2011. "Bringing Proximate Neighbours into the Study of US Residential Segregation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(4), pages 611-639, March.
    20. Ingrid Gould Ellen, 2000. "Race-based Neighbourhood Projection: A Proposed Framework for Understanding New Data on Racial Integration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 1513-1533, August.
    21. Rowland Atkinson, 2006. "Padding the Bunker: Strategies of Middle-class Disaffiliation and Colonisation in the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 819-832, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:25:y:2020:i:4:p:549-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.