IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v25y2020i3p350-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medicinal Cannabis Users Downplaying and Shifting Stigma: Articulations of the ‘Natural’, of What Is/Is Not a ‘Drug’ and Oppositions with ‘Chemical’ Substances

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Morris

Abstract

While sympathy exists among the public for chronically ill and/or disabled people who use cannabis medicinally, cannabis remains a prohibited substance in the UK. How do medicinal cannabis users negotiate this potential stigma when talking about their use of this substance? I reflect on the spoken discourses of 10 medicinal cannabis users (from a sample of 32), obtained by way of qualitative interviews, adopting a critical discourse analysis approach to the data. Specifically, I focus on their articulations around three related themes: cannabis as a ‘natural’ substance, discursive oppositions between cannabis and other substances, and articulations about what is/is not a ‘drug’. I examine how participants articulated these themes in ways that attempted to negotiate the potential for stigma that talking about their cannabis use involved. I found they used rhetorical strategies that downplay their own deviance, attempt to shift the application of stigma to users of other substances, or both. I argue that the more powerful the discursive resources that are articulated, the less rhetorical work an individual has to do to negotiate positive moral standing in an encounter. I also consider to what degree these articulations involved constructions emphasising individual self-control. I argue participants emphasise their individual self-control by asserting that cannabis is a ‘natural’ substance (connoting less inherent risk).

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Morris, 2020. "Medicinal Cannabis Users Downplaying and Shifting Stigma: Articulations of the ‘Natural’, of What Is/Is Not a ‘Drug’ and Oppositions with ‘Chemical’ Substances," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(3), pages 350-368, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:25:y:2020:i:3:p:350-368
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780419870814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780419870814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780419870814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radcliffe, Polly & Stevens, Alex, 2008. "Are drug treatment services only for 'thieving junkie scumbags'? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1065-1073, October.
    2. Phil Sutton, 1999. "Genetics and the Future of Nature Politics," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(3), pages 154-158, September.
    3. Brigitte Nerlich & David D. Clarke & Robert Dingwall, 1999. "The Influence of Popular Cultural Imagery on Public Attitudes towards Cloning," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(3), pages 251-261, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katrina Warren & Suzanne Huot & Lilian Magalhães & Marilyn Evans, 2016. "Exploring the Daily Lives of People on Methadone Maintenance Treatment: An Occupational Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Brigitte Nerlich, 2004. "War on foot and mouth disease in the UK, 2001: Towards a cultural understanding of agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 21(1), pages 15-25, March.
    3. Mynti Hossain & Lauren Akers & Patricia Del Grosso & Marisa Shenk & Michael Cavanaugh & Melissa Azur, "undated". "Touchpoints for Addressing Substance Use Issues in Home Visiting: Phase 1 Final Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0761ea54498b4f27b8d238e2b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Sarah Page & Sophia Fedorowicz & Fiona McCormack & Stephen Whitehead, 2024. "Women, Addictions, Mental Health, Dishonesty, and Crime Stigma: Solutions to Reduce the Social Harms of Stigma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Nettleton, Sarah & Neale, Joanne & Pickering, Lucy, 2011. "Techniques and transitions: A sociological analysis of sleeping practices amongst recovering heroin users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(8), pages 1367-1373, April.
    6. Elizabeth Stone, 2017. "Is There “Hope for Every Addicted American”? The New U.S. War on Drugs," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Christopher Benjamin Menadue & Kristi Giselsson & David Guez, 2020. "An Empirical Revision of the Definition of Science Fiction: It Is All in the Techne . . ," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    8. Lancaster, K. & Seear, K. & Treloar, C. & Ritter, A., 2017. "The productive techniques and constitutive effects of ‘evidence-based policy’ and ‘consumer participation’ discourses in health policy processes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 60-68.
    9. Gowan, Teresa & Whetstone, Sarah & Andic, Tanja, 2012. "Addiction, agency, and the politics of self-control: Doing harm reduction in a heroin users’ group," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1251-1260.
    10. McNeil, Ryan & Kerr, Thomas & Anderson, Solanna & Maher, Lisa & Keewatin, Chereece & Milloy, M.J. & Wood, Evan & Small, Will, 2015. "Negotiating structural vulnerability following regulatory changes to a provincial methadone program in vancouver, canada: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 168-176.
    11. Jonas, Adam B. & Young, April M. & Oser, Carrie B. & Leukefeld, Carl G. & Havens, Jennifer R., 2012. "OxyContin® as currency: OxyContin® use and increased social capital among rural Appalachian drug users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1602-1609.
    12. Järvinen, Margaretha, 2017. "From wanting to willing – controlled drug use as a treatment goal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 69-76.
    13. Rance, Jake & Newland, Jamee & Hopwood, Max & Treloar, Carla, 2012. "The politics of place(ment): Problematising the provision of hepatitis C treatment within opiate substitution clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 245-253.
    14. Yi-Ping Hsieh & Yun-Ju Wang & Ling-Yi Feng & Li-Tzy Wu & Jih-Heng Li, 2022. "Mifepristone (RU-486 ® ) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug—Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women’s Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Radcliffe, Polly, 2011. "Motherhood, pregnancy, and the negotiation of identity: The moral career of drug treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 984-991, March.
    16. Christopher Benjamin Menadue & Karen Diane Cheer, 2017. "Human Culture and Science Fiction: A Review of the Literature, 1980-2016," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    17. N/A, 2004. "Christine Hine (2004) ‘Social Research Methods and the Internet: A Thematic Review’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(2), pages 110-116, May.
    18. Jennifer Hoolachan, 2020. "Exploring the ‘Spoiled’ and ‘Celebrated’ Identities of Young and Homeless Drug Users," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 76-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:25:y:2020:i:3:p:350-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.