IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v15y2010i2p53-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering or Disempowering? Online Support among Seafarer-Partners

Author

Listed:
  • Lijun Tang

Abstract

Past research in sociology and social psychology has revealed two aspects of online support. This mutual support among members of online support groups brings about empowerment as well as produces common values. The interaction between the two, however, has not been explicitly explored. This paper fills in this gap by examining the activities of a group of seafarer-partners in an online support group. It shows that common beliefs and values in groups can make online support, which is supposed to be empowering, serve disempowering purposes. This suggests that online support can produce a tension between empowerment and disempowerment. The finding leads to the conclusion that group values condition the empowerment potential of online support.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijun Tang, 2010. "Empowering or Disempowering? Online Support among Seafarer-Partners," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(2), pages 53-64, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:15:y:2010:i:2:p:53-64
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2116
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seale, Clive & Ziebland, Sue & Charteris-Black, Jonathan, 2006. "Gender, cancer experience and internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2577-2590, May.
    2. Annie Hau-nung Chan, 2008. "The Dynamics of Motherhood Performance: Hong Kong's Middle Class Working Mothers On- and Off-Line," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(4), pages 53-68, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bottorff, Joan L. & Oliffe, John L. & Halpin, Michael & Phillips, Melanie & McLean, Graham & Mroz, Lawrence, 2008. "Women and prostate cancer support groups: The gender connect?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 1217-1227, March.
    2. Seale, Clive & Boden, Sharon & Williams, Simon & Lowe, Pam & Steinberg, Deborah, 2007. "Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 418-430, August.
    3. Jaworska, Sylvia & Ryan, Kath, 2018. "Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 107-114.
    4. Brian P. Jenssen & Nicola J. Gray & Kevin Harvey & Ralph J. DiClemente & Jonathan D. Klein, 2014. "Language and Love," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    5. Tian, Xiaoli & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Mauricio Marrone & Mara Hammerle, 2018. "Smart Cities: A Review and Analysis of Stakeholders’ Literature," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(3), pages 197-213, June.
    7. Yuk Lau, 2010. "The Impact of Fathers’ Work and Family Conflicts on Children’s Self-Esteem: The Hong Kong Case," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 363-376, February.
    8. Hanbyeol Jang & Jeremy Mennis, 2021. "The Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Heritage Site Conservation: An Analysis of the Operational Guidelines, 1994–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:15:y:2010:i:2:p:53-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.