IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i10p2577-2590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, cancer experience and internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups

Author

Listed:
  • Seale, Clive
  • Ziebland, Sue
  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan

Abstract

A new method, comparative keyword analysis, is used to compare the language of men and women with cancer in 97 research interviews and two popular internet based support groups for people with cancer. The method is suited to the conjoint qualitative and quantitative analysis of differences between large bodies of text, an alternative to the 'code and retrieval' approach used in much thematic analysis of qualitative materials. Web forums are a rich source of data about illness experience and gender differences. Marked differences in the performance of gender are evident. These differences follow linguistic and other behavioural patterns (such as social network differences) established in other contexts. Men with prostate cancer indicate in research interviews that they are more likely to seek information on the internet; women with breast cancer that they are more likely to seek social and emotional support. Men's concerns cluster around treatment information, medical personnel and procedures. Their experience of disease is more localised on particular areas of the body, while women's experience is more holistic. Women's forum postings orientate much more towards the exchange of emotional support, including concern with the impact of illness on a wide range of other people. Women's use of superlatives as well as words referring to feelings indicate their enactment of greater emotional expressivity. Web forums are platforms for an intensification of men's knowledge gathering activities. Web forums, though actually quite publicly visible, appear to be subjectively experienced by both sexes as relatively private places for the exchange of intimate personal information. The 'privacy' of the breast cancer forum facilitated interactions found in other studies to be characteristic of women's friendship groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Seale, Clive & Ziebland, Sue & Charteris-Black, Jonathan, 2006. "Gender, cancer experience and internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2577-2590, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:10:p:2577-2590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00609-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harrison, Judy & Maguire, Peter & Pitceathly, Carolyn, 1995. "Confiding in crisis: Gender differences in pattern of confiding among cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1255-1260, November.
    2. Pandey, Sanjay K. & Hart, John J. & Tiwary, Sheela, 2003. "Women's health and the internet: understanding emerging trends and implications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 179-191, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaworska, Sylvia & Ryan, Kath, 2018. "Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 107-114.
    2. Lijun Tang, 2010. "Empowering or Disempowering? Online Support among Seafarer-Partners," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(2), pages 53-64, May.
    3. Mauricio Marrone & Mara Hammerle, 2018. "Smart Cities: A Review and Analysis of Stakeholders’ Literature," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(3), pages 197-213, June.
    4. Bottorff, Joan L. & Oliffe, John L. & Halpin, Michael & Phillips, Melanie & McLean, Graham & Mroz, Lawrence, 2008. "Women and prostate cancer support groups: The gender connect?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 1217-1227, March.
    5. Tian, Xiaoli & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Hanbyeol Jang & Jeremy Mennis, 2021. "The Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Heritage Site Conservation: An Analysis of the Operational Guidelines, 1994–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Brian P. Jenssen & Nicola J. Gray & Kevin Harvey & Ralph J. DiClemente & Jonathan D. Klein, 2014. "Language and Love," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    8. Seale, Clive & Boden, Sharon & Williams, Simon & Lowe, Pam & Steinberg, Deborah, 2007. "Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 418-430, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning & Ren, Siyu & Xu, Lu & Chai, Jingxia & Irfan, Muhammad & Hao, Yu & Lu, Zhi-Nan, 2022. "The impact of internet development on the health of Chinese residents: Transmission mechanisms and empirical tests," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Ningyuan Guo & Ziqiu Guo & Shengzhi Zhao & Sai Yin Ho & Daniel Yee Tak Fong & Agnes Yuen Kwan Lai & Sophia Siu-chee Chan & Man Ping Wang & Tai Hing Lam, 2021. "Digital inequalities in health information seeking behaviors and experiences in the age of web 2.0: A population-based study in Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Olafsdottir, Sigrun & Pescosolido, Bernice A., 2011. "Constructing illness: How the public in eight Western nations respond to a clinical description of "schizophrenia"," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 929-938, September.
    4. Julie M. Turner-Cobb & Emily Arden-Close & Emma Portch & Liam Wignall, 2022. "Men and Women as Differential Social Barometers: Gender Effects of Perceived Friend Support on the Neuroticism-Loneliness-Well-Being Relationship in a Younger Adult Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Rao, Amar & Talan, Amogh & Abbas, Shujaat & Dev, Dhairya & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "The role of natural resources in the management of environmental sustainability: Machine learning approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Farah, Maya F. & Ramadan, Zahy B., 2017. "Disruptions versus more disruptions: How the Amazon dash button is altering consumer buying patterns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 54-61.
    7. Sillence, Elizabeth & Briggs, Pam & Harris, Peter Richard & Fishwick, Lesley, 2007. "How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 1853-1862, May.
    8. Slauson-Blevins, Kathleen S. & McQuillan, Julia & Greil, Arthur L., 2013. "Online and in-person health-seeking for infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 110-115.
    9. Sarah Stapleton & Natalie Pattison, 2015. "The lived experience of men with advanced cancer in relation to their perceptions of masculinity: a qualitative phenomenological study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1069-1078, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:10:p:2577-2590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.