IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v65y2007i3p418-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers

Author

Listed:
  • Seale, Clive
  • Boden, Sharon
  • Williams, Simon
  • Lowe, Pam
  • Steinberg, Deborah

Abstract

Medicalisation, healthicisation and 'personal' strategies have been identified as the main factors contributing to the socially mediated experience of sleep and sleep disorders in modern societies. Medicalisation and healthicisation are publicly available discourses. But the degree to which apparently 'personal' strategies for managing sleep are presented in popular media has been underestimated. This study of the coverage of 5 UK newspapers shows that both medicalised and healthicised discourses are concentrated in the 'serious' press. The tabloid press is more likely to constitute sleep as a private realm and tabloid readers are therefore relatively less exposed to officially sanctioned forms of knowledge about sleep. Analysis of Daily Mail coverage shows, though, that women's 'personal' strategies for managing sleep are far from being private solutions. The Mail presents this topic as a component of its social construction of a 'Middle England' lifestyle, giving these apparently 'personal' solutions a political resonance.

Suggested Citation

  • Seale, Clive & Boden, Sharon & Williams, Simon & Lowe, Pam & Steinberg, Deborah, 2007. "Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 418-430, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:418-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00163-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seale, Clive & Ziebland, Sue & Charteris-Black, Jonathan, 2006. "Gender, cancer experience and internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2577-2590, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabe, Jonathan & Williams, Simon J. & Coveney, Catherine M., 2017. "Prescription hypnotics in the news: A study of UK audiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 43-52.
    2. Barker, Kristin K., 2014. "Mindfulness meditation: Do-it-yourself medicalization of every moment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 168-176.
    3. Brian P. Jenssen & Nicola J. Gray & Kevin Harvey & Ralph J. DiClemente & Jonathan D. Klein, 2014. "Language and Love," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    4. Lawrence, Jody & Kearns, Robin A. & Park, Julie & Bryder, Linda & Worth, Heather, 2008. "Discourses of disease: Representations of tuberculosis within New Zealand newspapers 2002-2004," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 727-739, February.
    5. Coveney, Catherine M. & Nerlich, Brigitte & Martin, Paul, 2009. "Modafinil in the media: Metaphors, medicalisation and the body," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 487-495, February.
    6. Venn, Susan & Meadows, Robert & Arber, Sara, 2013. "Gender differences in approaches to self-management of poor sleep in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 117-123.
    7. Williams, Simon J. & Coveney, Catherine M. & Gabe, Jonathan, 2013. "Medicalisation or customisation? Sleep, enterprise and enhancement in the 24/7 society," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 40-47.
    8. Sara Arber & Jenny Hislop & Simon Williams, 2007. "Editors’ Introduction: Gender, Sleep and the Life Course," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(5), pages 85-91, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bottorff, Joan L. & Oliffe, John L. & Halpin, Michael & Phillips, Melanie & McLean, Graham & Mroz, Lawrence, 2008. "Women and prostate cancer support groups: The gender connect?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 1217-1227, March.
    2. Mauricio Marrone & Mara Hammerle, 2018. "Smart Cities: A Review and Analysis of Stakeholders’ Literature," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(3), pages 197-213, June.
    3. Jaworska, Sylvia & Ryan, Kath, 2018. "Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 107-114.
    4. Brian P. Jenssen & Nicola J. Gray & Kevin Harvey & Ralph J. DiClemente & Jonathan D. Klein, 2014. "Language and Love," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    5. Hanbyeol Jang & Jeremy Mennis, 2021. "The Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Heritage Site Conservation: An Analysis of the Operational Guidelines, 1994–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Lijun Tang, 2010. "Empowering or Disempowering? Online Support among Seafarer-Partners," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(2), pages 53-64, May.
    7. Tian, Xiaoli & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:418-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.