IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v70y2024i6p1108-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proxy consultations for severe mental illnesses: An exploratory cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Prakyath Ravindranath Hegde
  • Guru S Gowda
  • Bhavika Vajawat
  • Sivakami Sundari Subramaniyan
  • Vinay Basavaraju
  • Narayana Manjunatha
  • Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar
  • Suresh Bada Math

Abstract

Background: Non-adherence to medication leading to a break in continuity of care poses significant challenges in severe mental illness (SMI), leading to poor outcomes. In India, proxy consultation, wherein caregivers consult on behalf of patients, is a commonly adopted but insufficiently researched area to address these challenges. Aims: To explore the extent of proxy consultation in outpatient care of persons with SMI and investigate its sociodemographic and clinical correlates. Methodology: In a tertiary care psychiatry outpatient setting, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving 374 caregivers of persons with SMI (Schizophrenia, Bipolar and related disorders). Descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression were performed to examine correlates’ relationships with proxy consultation. Results: Proxy consultation prevalence was 43% in the past 1 year. Compared with 18 to 30 years, middle-aged patients aged 31 to 40, 41 to 50 and 51 to 60 years had twofold, threefold and sixfold increased chances of proxy consultation, respectively. Being illiterate had six times higher odds than graduates, three times and two times if they studied till primary and secondary education. Early age of onset was associated with three times higher chances of proxy consultation compared to the onset of illness in adulthood. On the contrary, male gender and upper and middle socioeconomic status decreased the chances of proxy consultation by 40%. Financial difficulties ( n  = 72, 45%) and patients’ unwillingness to visit outpatients ( n  = 44, 27.5%) were the most commonly cited reasons for proxy consultation. Conclusion: Proxy consultations are relatively common, driven by many social, economic, patient-related, pragmatic and practical factors. In formulating community care policies for persons with SMI, the primary imperative should be to conduct additional research, deepening our understanding of proxy consultations. Additionally, it is essential to be mindful of the diverse issues associated with proxy consultations during the formulation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Prakyath Ravindranath Hegde & Guru S Gowda & Bhavika Vajawat & Sivakami Sundari Subramaniyan & Vinay Basavaraju & Narayana Manjunatha & Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar & Suresh Bada Math, 2024. "Proxy consultations for severe mental illnesses: An exploratory cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(6), pages 1108-1117, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:6:p:1108-1117
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640241255591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640241255591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640241255591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:6:p:1108-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.