IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v66y2020i7p707-723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Views of patient relatives and health professionals about the reasons of the patients enrolled in the community mental health center to discontinue or irregularly continue the center

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Ceren Guvenc
  • Hatice Oner

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to determine the views of patient relatives and health professionals about the reasons of patients enrolled in the community mental health center to discontinue or irregularly continue the center. Methods: This study is qualitative and phenomenological. The study group consisted of 17 patient relatives and eight health professionals according to the maximum variation sampling method. In the study, the data were collected using the personal information form in semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed with the descriptive (thematic) method in the MAXQDA 2018 package program. Results: In line with the research findings, themes and codes were determined based on the statements of patient relatives and health professionals. For patient relatives, the themes were determined as disease symptoms, disease effect/coping difficulties, misbeliefs-fears, problems about the center, and social and economic causes. For health professionals, the themes were determined as reasons for not coming to the community mental health center, problems related to center health professionals, level/severity of the disease and treatment compliance, socio-economic conditions and problems experienced by health professionals. Conclusion: It can be said that the views of patient relatives and health professionals about the discontinuity of patients to the center were similar. It was seen that the problems regarding factors such as disease severity, disease effects, knowledge and beliefs of the family, stigma, functionality and promotion of the center were effective in patient’s continuity to the center. In line with the research findings, it was recommended to improve the quality of the activities in the center to increase the number of patients enrolled in the community mental health center and their continuity, develop training programs that also involve health professionals to increase the quality of service, and increase the cooperation with patient relatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Ceren Guvenc & Hatice Oner, 2020. "Views of patient relatives and health professionals about the reasons of the patients enrolled in the community mental health center to discontinue or irregularly continue the center," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(7), pages 707-723, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:66:y:2020:i:7:p:707-723
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020931875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020931875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020931875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whitley, Rob & Denise Campbell, Rosalyn, 2014. "Stigma, agency and recovery amongst people with severe mental illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anton N Isaacs & Keith Sutton & Kim Dalziel & Darryl Maybery, 2017. "Outcomes of a care coordinated service model for persons with severe and persistent mental illness: A qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(1), pages 40-47, February.
    2. Tonje Fyhn & Simon Øverland & Silje E Reme, 2021. "Predictors of employment in people with moderate to severe mental illness participating in a randomized controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS)," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(2), pages 150-157, March.
    3. Baert, Stijn & De Visschere, Sarah & Schoors, Koen & Vandenberghe, Désirée & Omey, Eddy, 2016. "First depressed, then discriminated against?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 247-254.
    4. Kouame Kouakou Felicien & Digbeu Alain Fabrice & Samouth Aka Fabrice, 2020. "Social representations of Covid-19 and stigmatization of healthcare personnel and people attained by abidjanese populations, Cote d'Ivoire," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 352-363, July.
    5. Alex Dregan & Ann McNeill & Fiona Gaughran & Peter B Jones & Anna Bazley & Sean Cross & Kate Lillywhite & David Armstrong & Shubulade Smith & David P J Osborn & Robert Stewart & Til Wykes & Matthew Ho, 2020. "Potential gains in life expectancy from reducing amenable mortality among people diagnosed with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Xi Chen & Jingjing Su & Daniel Thomas Bressington & Yan Li & Sau Fong Leung, 2022. "Perspectives of Nursing Students towards Schizophrenia Stigma: A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Timmermans, Stefan & Tietbohl, Caroline, 2018. "Fifty years of sociological leadership at Social Science and Medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 209-215.
    8. Mendes, Álvaro & Sousa, Liliana & Sequeiros, Jorge & Clarke, Angus, 2017. "Discredited legacy: Stigma and familial amyloid polyneuropathy in Northwestern Portugal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-80.
    9. Jingfang Liu & Jiayu Wang, 2021. "Users’ Intention to Continue Using Online Mental Health Communities: Empowerment Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:66:y:2020:i:7:p:707-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.