IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i4p394-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying depressive symptom trajectory groups among Korean adults and psychosocial factors as group determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Tae Yeon Kwon

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal research is needed to examine the depressive symptom trajectories of different groups during adulthood and their antecedents and consequences, because depressive symptoms may be changeable and heterogeneous over time. Aims: This study examined the number of trajectory groups describing the depressive symptoms of Korean adults, as well as the shape of the trajectories and the association between trajectory group membership and psychosocial factors identified based on the ecosystem model. Method: This study used Nagin’s semi-parametric group-based modeling to analyze Year 1 to Year 7 data from Korea Welfare Panel Survey ( N  = 13,735), a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults. Results: Three distinct trajectory groups were identified: a low stable depressive symptoms group, a moderate depressive symptoms group and a high depressive symptoms group. Result from multinominal logit analysis showed that all psychosocial factors except family relationships affected the likelihood of membership in the three depressive symptoms groups. Especially, self-esteem was the psychosocial factor with the largest impact on depressive symptom trajectory group membership. When screening for depressive symptoms, individuals with a low socioeconomic status should be a primary concern and intervention should be made available to them. Conclusion: Prevention or intervention with members of the identified trajectory groups would likely require integrative approaches targeting psychosocial factors across multiple contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae Yeon Kwon, 2015. "Identifying depressive symptom trajectory groups among Korean adults and psychosocial factors as group determinants," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(4), pages 394-403, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:4:p:394-403
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764015573847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573847
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764015573847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Meredith & John Tisak, 1990. "Latent curve analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 107-122, March.
    2. Tomey, Kristin & Sowers, MaryFran R. & Harlow, Sioban & Jannausch, Mary & Zheng, Huiyong & Bromberger, Joyce, 2010. "Physical functioning among mid-life women: Associations with trajectory of depressive symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1259-1267, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Guerra & Francesca Bassi & José G. Dias, 2020. "A Multiple-Indicator Latent Growth Mixture Model to Track Courses with Low-Quality Teaching," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 361-381, January.
    2. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    3. Yih-Ing Hser & Haikang Shen & Chih-Ping Chou & Stephen C. Messer & M. Douglas Anglin, 2001. "Analytic Approaches for Assessing Long-Term Treatment Effects," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 233-262, April.
    4. Stephen Toit & Robert Cudeck, 2009. "Estimation of the Nonlinear Random Coefficient Model when Some Random Effects Are Separable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 65-82, March.
    5. Roe, R.A., 2005. "Studying time in organizational behavior," Research Memorandum 046, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    6. Ellen L. Hamaker, 2005. "Conditions for the Equivalence of the Autoregressive Latent Trajectory Model and a Latent Growth Curve Model With Autoregressive Disturbances," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 33(3), pages 404-416, February.
    7. Laura Castro-Schilo & Barbara L. Fredrickson & Dan Mungas, 2019. "Association of Positive Affect with Cognitive Health and Decline for Elder Mexican Americans," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2385-2400, December.
    8. Daniel S. Nagin & Richard E. Tremblay, 2005. "What Has Been Learned from Group-Based Trajectory Modeling? Examples from Physical Aggression and Other Problem Behaviors," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 602(1), pages 82-117, November.
    9. Chun Wang & Steven W. Nydick, 2020. "On Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models: A Didactic," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(3), pages 339-368, June.
    10. Eldad Davidov & Stefan Thörner & Peter Schmidt & Stefanie Gosen & Carina Wolf, 2011. "Level and change of group-focused enmity in Germany: unconditional and conditional latent growth curve models with four panel waves," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 481-500, December.
    11. Pietro Lovaglio & Mario Mezzanzanica, 2013. "Classification of longitudinal career paths," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 989-1008, February.
    12. Shu Xu & Shelley A. Blozis, 2011. "Sensitivity Analysis of Mixed Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(2), pages 237-256, April.
    13. John McArdle, 2011. "Longitudinal dynamic analyses of cognition in the health and retirement study panel," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 453-480, December.
    14. Kim, Dong Ha & Um, Myung-Yong, 2018. "The relationships among family income, parental depression, and adolescent aggression in South Korea: A latent growth mediation model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 168-175.
    15. Jost Reinecke & Daniel Seddig, 2011. "Growth mixture models in longitudinal research," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 415-434, December.
    16. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2006. "Mean Comparison: Manifest Variable Versus Latent Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 139-159, March.
    17. Shelley A. Blozis & Jeffrey R. Harring, 2017. "Understanding Individual-level Change Through the Basis Functions of a Latent Curve Model," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(4), pages 793-820, November.
    18. Sun-Pyo Lee & Kyungji Kim & Sungbum Park, 2023. "Investigating the Market Success of Software-as-a-Service Providers: the Multivariate Latent Growth Curve Model Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 639-658, April.
    19. Georg Henning & Graciela Muniz-Terrera & Andreas Stenling & Martin Hyde, 2024. "Job satisfaction declines before retirement in Germany," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Marcel de Toledo Vieira & Maria de Fátima Salgueiro & Peter W. F. Smith, 2016. "Investigating impacts of complex sampling on latent growth curve modelling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 1310-1321, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:4:p:394-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.