IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i4p394-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying depressive symptom trajectory groups among Korean adults and psychosocial factors as group determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Tae Yeon Kwon

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal research is needed to examine the depressive symptom trajectories of different groups during adulthood and their antecedents and consequences, because depressive symptoms may be changeable and heterogeneous over time. Aims: This study examined the number of trajectory groups describing the depressive symptoms of Korean adults, as well as the shape of the trajectories and the association between trajectory group membership and psychosocial factors identified based on the ecosystem model. Method: This study used Nagin’s semi-parametric group-based modeling to analyze Year 1 to Year 7 data from Korea Welfare Panel Survey ( N  = 13,735), a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults. Results: Three distinct trajectory groups were identified: a low stable depressive symptoms group, a moderate depressive symptoms group and a high depressive symptoms group. Result from multinominal logit analysis showed that all psychosocial factors except family relationships affected the likelihood of membership in the three depressive symptoms groups. Especially, self-esteem was the psychosocial factor with the largest impact on depressive symptom trajectory group membership. When screening for depressive symptoms, individuals with a low socioeconomic status should be a primary concern and intervention should be made available to them. Conclusion: Prevention or intervention with members of the identified trajectory groups would likely require integrative approaches targeting psychosocial factors across multiple contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae Yeon Kwon, 2015. "Identifying depressive symptom trajectory groups among Korean adults and psychosocial factors as group determinants," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(4), pages 394-403, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:4:p:394-403
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764015573847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573847
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764015573847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomey, Kristin & Sowers, MaryFran R. & Harlow, Sioban & Jannausch, Mary & Zheng, Huiyong & Bromberger, Joyce, 2010. "Physical functioning among mid-life women: Associations with trajectory of depressive symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1259-1267, October.
    2. William Meredith & John Tisak, 1990. "Latent curve analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 107-122, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    2. Yih-Ing Hser & Haikang Shen & Chih-Ping Chou & Stephen C. Messer & M. Douglas Anglin, 2001. "Analytic Approaches for Assessing Long-Term Treatment Effects," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 233-262, April.
    3. Laura Castro-Schilo & Barbara L. Fredrickson & Dan Mungas, 2019. "Association of Positive Affect with Cognitive Health and Decline for Elder Mexican Americans," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2385-2400, December.
    4. Chun Wang & Steven W. Nydick, 2020. "On Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models: A Didactic," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(3), pages 339-368, June.
    5. Eldad Davidov & Stefan Thörner & Peter Schmidt & Stefanie Gosen & Carina Wolf, 2011. "Level and change of group-focused enmity in Germany: unconditional and conditional latent growth curve models with four panel waves," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 481-500, December.
    6. Pietro Lovaglio & Mario Mezzanzanica, 2013. "Classification of longitudinal career paths," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 989-1008, February.
    7. Shu Xu & Shelley A. Blozis, 2011. "Sensitivity Analysis of Mixed Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(2), pages 237-256, April.
    8. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2006. "Mean Comparison: Manifest Variable Versus Latent Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 139-159, March.
    9. Sun-Pyo Lee & Kyungji Kim & Sungbum Park, 2023. "Investigating the Market Success of Software-as-a-Service Providers: the Multivariate Latent Growth Curve Model Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 639-658, April.
    10. Min Hua Jen & Ron Johnston & Kelvyn Jones & Richard Harris & Axel Gandy, 2010. "International Variations In Life Expectancy: A Spatio‐Temporal Analysis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(1), pages 73-90, February.
    11. Hess, Brian, 2000. "Assessing program impact using latent growth modeling: a primer for the evaluator," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 419-428, November.
    12. Takahiro Hoshino & Hiroshi Kurata & Kazuo Shigemasu, 2006. "A Propensity Score Adjustment for Multiple Group Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 691-712, December.
    13. Guido Alessandri & Michele Vecchione & Brent Donnellan & John Tisak, 2013. "An Application of the LC-LSTM Framework to the Self-esteem Instability Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 769-792, October.
    14. Michael J. Shanahan & Adam Davey & Jennifer Brooks, 1998. "Dynamic Models of Poverty and Psychosocial Adjustment through Childhood," JCPR Working Papers 49, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    15. Lucio Masserini & Caterina Liberati & Paolo Mariani, 2017. "Quality service in banking: a longitudinal approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 509-523, March.
    16. Kenneth A. Bollen & Patrick J. Curran, 2004. "Autoregressive Latent Trajectory (ALT) Models A Synthesis of Two Traditions," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(3), pages 336-383, February.
    17. Bobby L. Jones & Daniel S. Nagin & Kathryn Roeder, 2001. "A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 29(3), pages 374-393, February.
    18. Marc A. Scott & Mark S. Handcock, 2005. "Persistent Inequality? Answers From Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 34(1), pages 3-30, August.
    19. Jichuan Wang & Harvey A. Siegal & Russel S. Falck & Robert G. Carlson & Ahmmed Rahman, 1999. "Evaluation of Hiv Risk Reduction Intervention Programs Via Latent Growth Model," Evaluation Review, , vol. 23(6), pages 648-662, December.
    20. Areti Gkypali & Kostas Kounetas & Kostas Tsekouras, 2019. "European countries’ competitiveness and productive performance evolution: unraveling the complexity in a heterogeneity context," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 665-695, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:4:p:394-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.