IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v58y2012i5p463-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of perceptions related to family risk of bipolar disorder among patients and family members from India

Author

Listed:
  • Raman Deep Pattanayak
  • Rajesh Sagar

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade there have been rapid advances in psychiatry genetics and there is a growing concern about the clinical and practical relevance of this knowledge. Efforts are being made to know the perspectives of patients and family members regarding family risk and genetic counselling. However, the area remains largely unexplored in psychiatric research from Asian countries. Aim: The primary purpose of the study was to explore the perceptions related to family risk among Indian patients with bipolar disorder and their family members. The study also aimed to explore the related perceptions for etiology of bipolar disorder. Method: Patients with bipolar disorder type I and family members of patients with bipolar disorder type I were invited to take part in in-depth interviews after informed consent, targeting a sample of diversity. The qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Eight key themes emerged: (1) higher emphasis on external or situational causes; (2) causal explanations are governed by cultural beliefs; (3) help-seeking is a shared, rather than a personal, decision; (4) the perceived genetic risk is low but worrisome; (5) worries and apprehensions are focused mainly on future generations; (6) there is a desire to modify the perceived genetic risk; (7) knowledge of precise risk can be beneficial as well as anxiety provoking; and (8) there is a need for information on preventive measures. Conclusion: The study provides culture-specific perspectives on the causation of illness and explores a sensitive and personal matter of perceived family risk in an Indian sample. It emphasizes the need to further explore the perceptions of family risk in a given cultural context.

Suggested Citation

  • Raman Deep Pattanayak & Rajesh Sagar, 2012. "A qualitative study of perceptions related to family risk of bipolar disorder among patients and family members from India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(5), pages 463-469, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:5:p:463-469
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764011408543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764011408543
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764011408543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meiser, Bettina & Mitchell, Philip B. & McGirr, H. & Van Herten, M. & Schofield, Peter R., 2005. "Implications of genetic risk information in families with a high density of bipolar disorder: an exploratory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 109-118, January.
    2. Aravinda Chakravarti & Peter Little, 2003. "Nature, nurture and human disease," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6921), pages 412-414, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kvaale, Erlend P. & Gottdiener, William H. & Haslam, Nick, 2013. "Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 95-103.
    2. de Vries, Jantina & Jallow, Muminatou & Williams, Thomas N. & Kwiatkowski, Dominic & Parker, Michael & Fitzpatrick, Raymond, 2012. "Investigating the potential for ethnic group harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa: Is ethnic stigmatisation likely?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1400-1407.
    3. Shostak, Sara & Zarhin, Dana & Ottman, Ruth, 2011. "What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 645-654, September.
    4. Faure, Marlyn C. & Matshabane, Olivia P. & Marshall, Patricia & Appelbaum, Paul S. & Stein, Dan J. & Engel, Mark E. & de Vries, Jantina, 2019. "Does genetics matter for disease-related stigma? The impact of genetic attribution on stigma associated with rheumatic heart disease in the Western Cape, South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Easter, Michele M., 2012. "“Not all my fault”: Genetics, stigma, and personal responsibility for women with eating disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1408-1416.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:5:p:463-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.