IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i1p109-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of genetic risk information in families with a high density of bipolar disorder: an exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Meiser, Bettina
  • Mitchell, Philip B.
  • McGirr, H.
  • Van Herten, M.
  • Schofield, Peter R.

Abstract

While major susceptibility genes for bipolar disorder are yet to be identified, the opportunity exists to systematically ascertain the important issues and societal implications of genetic risk determination for bipolar disorder prior to these technological advances becoming widely available. This study explores, in a sample of families with a high density of bipolar disorder: (i) attitudes to predictive genetic and prenatal testing, using different risk frames; (ii) attributions for bipolar disorder, in particular the degree to which a genetic model is endorsed; and (iii) the impact of these attributions on the perceived stigma of bipolar disorder. A qualitative methodology was selected as most appropriate as no previous research has examined this issue. Participants were ascertained through a molecular genetics study of bipolar disorder. In-depth interviews were conducted with 21 members of families with a high density of bipolar disorder. Most participants reported being interested in genetic testing if it gave a definitive answer, while expressed interest in testing was lower if it gave a probable answer only. Almost all stressed that a genetic susceptibility and environmental factors interacted. Most participants felt that a genetic explanation was likely to decrease the stigma associated with bipolar disorder as it shifted the locus of control and responsibility away from the individual towards the role of heredity. Findings indicate that expressed interest in genetic testing depends on the certainty imparted by the test. Results suggest that families with bipolar disorder are likely to benefit psychologically from information about the genetic basis of bipolar disorder.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiser, Bettina & Mitchell, Philip B. & McGirr, H. & Van Herten, M. & Schofield, Peter R., 2005. "Implications of genetic risk information in families with a high density of bipolar disorder: an exploratory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 109-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:1:p:109-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00196-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mechanic, David & McAlpine, Donna & Rosenfield, Sarah & Davis, Diane, 1994. "Effects of illness attribution and depression on the quality of life among persons with serious mental illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 155-164, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faure, Marlyn C. & Matshabane, Olivia P. & Marshall, Patricia & Appelbaum, Paul S. & Stein, Dan J. & Engel, Mark E. & de Vries, Jantina, 2019. "Does genetics matter for disease-related stigma? The impact of genetic attribution on stigma associated with rheumatic heart disease in the Western Cape, South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Easter, Michele M., 2012. "“Not all my fault”: Genetics, stigma, and personal responsibility for women with eating disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1408-1416.
    3. Kvaale, Erlend P. & Gottdiener, William H. & Haslam, Nick, 2013. "Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 95-103.
    4. Shostak, Sara & Zarhin, Dana & Ottman, Ruth, 2011. "What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 645-654, September.
    5. Raman Deep Pattanayak & Rajesh Sagar, 2012. "A qualitative study of perceptions related to family risk of bipolar disorder among patients and family members from India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(5), pages 463-469, September.
    6. de Vries, Jantina & Jallow, Muminatou & Williams, Thomas N. & Kwiatkowski, Dominic & Parker, Michael & Fitzpatrick, Raymond, 2012. "Investigating the potential for ethnic group harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa: Is ethnic stigmatisation likely?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1400-1407.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kinderman, Peter & Setzu, Erika & Lobban, Fiona & Salmon, Peter, 2006. "Illness beliefs in schizophrenia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1900-1911, October.
    2. Constantin Tranulis & Ellen Corin & Laurence J. Kirmayer, 2008. "Insight and Psychosis: Comparing the Perspectives of Patient, Entourage and Clinician," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(3), pages 225-241, May.
    3. Mueller, Brigitte & Nordt, Carlos & Lauber, Christoph & Rueesch, Peter & Meyer, Peter C. & Roessler, Wulf, 2006. "Social support modifies perceived stigmatization in the first years of mental illness: A longitudinal approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 39-49, January.
    4. Pescosolido, Bernice A. & Martin, Jack K. & Lang, Annie & Olafsdottir, Sigrun, 2008. "Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: A Framework Integrating Normative Influences on Stigma (FINIS)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 431-440, August.
    5. Tam, Hau-lin & Chan, Angus Yuk-fung & Fung, Toby Tin-on & Isangha, Stanley Oloji, 2024. "The mediating effect of psychological strengths and resilience on enhancing youth employability through social entrepreneurship education and training," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Temilola J Mosanya & Adegoke O Adelufosi & Olaolu T Adebowale & Adegboyega Ogunwale & Olaide K Adebayo, 2014. "Self-stigma, quality of life and schizophrenia: An outpatient clinic survey in Nigeria," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(4), pages 377-386, June.
    7. Aditya Simha & Sana Ahmed & Ramakrishna Prasad & Akshay S. Dinesh & Arun Kandasamy & Naren P Rao, 2022. "Effect of national cultural dimensions and consumption rates on stigma toward alcohol and substance use disorders," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(7), pages 1411-1417, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:1:p:109-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.