IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v49y2018i4p441-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Games Ready to Use: A Serious Game for Teaching Natural Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Taillandier
  • Carole Adam

Abstract

Background. Risk management , and in particular the management of natural hazards and territorial risks has become an essential skill for civil engineers. Teaching risk management to engineering students is therefore crucial, but is also challenging: it looks too abstract to students, and practical works are complex and expensive to organise. It also involves interconnected mechanisms coupling human and technical aspects, that are difficult to explain. Aim. The challenge is then to propose a serious game able to support the teaching of territorial risk management to engineering students. As part of their curriculum, these students are expected to learn various concepts and notions: territorial risk, vulnerability of a territory, resilience, risk perception, multi-criteria analysis and balanced management. Method. In order to support risk management teaching, we propose SPRITE, an agent-based serious game using a concrete case study which is exemplary in terms of risk management: the coastal floods on the Oleron Island (France). SPRITE places the player (the student) in the role of a local councillor of the Oleron Island, who must ensure the safety and well-being of the island residents, while maximising performance with respect to economic and environmental issues, in a context of coastal flood risk. Results. The model is fully implemented in GAMA, an open-source multi-agent geographical simulation platform, and the game is already playable. It was used at the University of Bordeaux in a course on risk management dedicated to students in the Master of Geology and Civil Engineering. The evaluation of engagement and motivation with the game and learning from playing is very positive. Conclusions. The results from the game evaluation are encouraging. Short term future work will mainly be dedicated to pursuing this evaluation, and comparing results between students using SPRITE vs students following a more traditional course. Longer term prospects include several improvements of the model and the interface and implemented multiplayer features.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Taillandier & Carole Adam, 2018. "Games Ready to Use: A Serious Game for Teaching Natural Risk Management," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(4), pages 441-470, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:49:y:2018:i:4:p:441-470
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878118770217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878118770217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878118770217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cailloux, Olivier & Mayag, Brice & Meyer, Patrick & Mousseau, Vincent, 2013. "Operational tools to build a multicriteria territorial risk scale with multiple stakeholders," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 88-97.
    2. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Exchange," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 65-76, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Rye & Emel Aktas, 2022. "Serious Games as a Validation Tool for PREDIS: A Decision Support System for Disaster Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-37, December.
    2. Christian Neuwirth, 2020. "EQUILIBRIUM game: a virtual field trip through a complex system," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 223-238, April.
    3. Theresa Tribaldos & Flurina Schneider, 2021. "Enabling Players to Develop Theories of Change for Sustainable Development: A Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(5), pages 664-678, October.
    4. Timothy C. Clapper, 2018. "Serious Games Are Not All Serious," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(4), pages 375-377, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riitta-Maija Hämalainen, 2017. "Knowledge Translation Platform Increasing Use of Research Evidence in Physical Activity Policy Making - A Case Study in Finland," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 126-126, September.
    2. Melih Madanoglu, 2018. "Theories of economic and social exchange in entrepreneurial partnerships: an agenda for future research," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 649-656, September.
    3. Jones Osasuyi, Orumwense & Greenfield Mwakipsile, 2017. "Working Capital Management and Managerial Performance in some Selected Manufacturing Firms in Edo State Nigeria," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 46-55.
    4. Keval Amin & Erica Harris, 2022. "The Effect of Investor Sentiment on Nonprofit Donations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 427-450, January.
    5. Bouckaert Geert, 2012. "Reforming for Performance and Trust: Some Reflections," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 9-20, July.
    6. Dodgson, Mark & Hughes, Alan & Foster, John & Metcalfe, Stan, 2011. "Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1145-1156.
    7. Berliant, Marcus & Wang, Ping, 2008. "Urban growth and subcenter formation: A trolley ride from the Staples Center to Disneyland and the Rose Bowl," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 679-693, March.
    8. Stefano Usai & Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci, 2017. "Networks, Proximities, and Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 377-404, July.
    9. Federica Rossi & Ainurul Rosli, 2013. "Indicators of university-industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the UK’s HE-BCI survey," Working Papers 13, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Aug 2013.
    10. Eugene Okyere-Kwakye & Khalil Md Nor, 2011. "Individual Factors and Knowledge Sharing," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 66-72, January.
    11. Benjamin E. Bagozzi & Thomas Brawner & Bumba Mukherjee & Vineeta Yadav, 2014. "Regional International Organizations and Individual Immigration Attitudes: Results from Finite Mixture Models," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 350-375, May.
    12. Shuang Ma & Huimin Gu & Daniel P. Hampson & Yonggui Wang, 2020. "Enhancing Customer Civility in the Peer-to-Peer Economy: Empirical Evidence from the Hospitality Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 77-95, November.
    13. Lei Ye & Gang Zeng & Xianzhong Cao, 2020. "Open innovation and innovative performance of universities: Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1142-1157, September.
    14. He, Qile & Ghobadian, Abby & Gallear, David, 2013. "Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 605-618.
    15. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. ""No Strings Attached": Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Post-Print hal-00797037, HAL.
    16. Llopis, Oscar & D’Este, Pablo, 2016. "Beneficiary contact and innovation: The relation between contact with patients and medical innovation under different institutional logics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1512-1523.
    17. Yen, Dorothy Ai-wan & Abosag, Ibrahim, 2016. "Localization in China: How guanxi moderates Sino–US business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5724-5734.
    18. Akin, Becci A. & Byers, Kaela D. & Lloyd, Margaret H. & McDonald, Thomas P., 2015. "Joining formative evaluation with translational science to assess an EBI in foster care: Examining social–emotional well-being and placement stability," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 253-264.
    19. Hiroaki Saito, 2017. "The Role of Intermediaries in Community Capacity Building: Pro-Poor Tourism Perspective," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-3.17.
    20. Yuzhuo Cai & Jinyuan Ma & Qiongqiong Chen, 2020. "Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:49:y:2018:i:4:p:441-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.