IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v7y2017i2p2158244017701800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Research-Led Teaching: Two Cases of Practical Data Reuse in the Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Maureen Haaker
  • Bethany Morgan-Brett

Abstract

Research-led teaching is an area that has gained attention and prominence within higher education. This article reviews two teaching resources developed from archived research data and demonstrates how this type of data reuse helps teachers establish a clear connection between research and teaching. The two teaching resources, developed by the authors in their time working at the UK Data Service, were created for use in higher education, and use Annette Lawson’s 1980s study of adultery and Stanley Cohen’s 1960s study of Mods and Rockers. The authors describe the resources in detail, explain how and why the content was developed, and explore the potential value that preserved real-world research data can have when using research to teach. The reviews of these resources point to the great possibilities for future development of teaching resources using archived data to support a range of teaching modules, from methods to topical undergraduate courses, as well as demonstrate the value of archived data and documentation for research practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Maureen Haaker & Bethany Morgan-Brett, 2017. "Developing Research-Led Teaching: Two Cases of Practical Data Reuse in the Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:2158244017701800
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017701800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017701800
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017701800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Libby Bishop, 2007. "A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(3), pages 43-56, May.
    2. Louise Corti & Nigel Fielding, 2016. "Opportunities From the Digital Revolution," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    3. Jo Haynes & Demelza Jones, 2012. "A Tale of Two Analyses[1]: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kahryn Hughes & Jason Hughes & Anna Tarrant, 2022. "Working at a remove: continuous, collective, and configurative approaches to qualitative secondary analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 375-394, April.
    2. Louise Corti & Nigel Fielding & Libby Bishop, 2016. "Editorial for Special Edition, Digital Representations," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    3. Raffael Heiss & Desirée Schmuck & Jörg Matthes & Carolin Eicher, 2021. "Citizen Science in Schools: Predictors and Outcomes of Participating in Voluntary Political Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    4. Jo Haynes & Demelza Jones, 2012. "A Tale of Two Analyses[1]: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Catherine Dodds & Peter Keogh & Adam Bourne & Lisa McDaid & Corinne Squire & Peter Weatherburn & Ingrid Young, 2021. "The Long and Winding Road: Archiving and Re-Using Qualitative Data from 12 Research Projects Spanning 16 Years," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 269-287, June.
    6. Simone Belli & Ernesto Ponsot, 2022. "Liquid Science and Digital Transformation: How Knowledge between Researchers Flows in Their Scientific Networks," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Abigail Knight & Julia Brannen & Rebecca O'connell, 2015. "Using Narrative Sources from the Mass Observation Archive to Study Everyday Food and Families in Hard Times: Food Practices in England during 1950," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 29-72, February.
    8. Libby Bishop & Arja Kuula-Luumi, 2017. "Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    9. Sarah Irwin & Mandy Winterton, 2012. "Qualitative Secondary Analysis and Social Explanation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Doris Bambey & Louise Corti & Michael Diepenbroek & Heidemarie Hanekop & Betina Hollstein & Sabine Imeri & Hubert Knoblauch & Susanne Kretzer & Christian Meier zu Verl & Christian Meyer & Alexia Meyer, 2018. "Archivierung und Zugang zu Qualitativen Daten," RatSWD Working Papers 267, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    11. Emily Namey & Greg Guest & Amy O’Regan & Christine L. Godwin & Jamilah Taylor & Andres Martinez, 2022. "How does qualitative data collection modality affect disclosure of sensitive information and participant experience? Findings from a quasi-experimental study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2341-2360, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:2158244017701800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.