IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i2p2158244013485580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Ten-Value-Type Framework Associated With Spectator Sports

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Shiue Gau
  • Jeffrey D. James

Abstract

Prior value studies in sport settings have been focused on participation rather than spectatorship. This study is an initial step in examining the values associated with spectator sports. Interviews and focus groups were utilized in this qualitative study within four progressive phases for triangulation, transferability, and constant comparative assessment. A total of 54 individuals participated in the study. Because values were subjectively perceived at the highest level of abstraction reflecting desirable preference experiences, the interviews were designed to include seven categories of questions: Three categories dealt with observed behaviors and implied metaphors, and four categories including questions comparing spectator sports and sport participation, religion, other leisure activities, and substitutes. Grounded data techniques guided the coding procedure. Using the transcriptions and notes from 26 interviews and three focus groups, five coders were used to provide evidence of interrater reliability. Based on the results of the data analyses, a 10-value-type framework was developed in relation to spectator sports: (a) Enjoyment (pleasure and satisfaction), (b) Sociability (social interaction through sport spectating), (c) Identity (enhancing self-esteem), (d) Status (pursuing social recognition), (e) Moral, (f) Spirituality (inner peace, strength, meaning, and purpose in life), (g) Epistemic, (h) Aesthetics, (i) Ritual (sports spectating becomes a series of formal and serious acts followed regularly and invariably as end-experience), and (j) no or negative values. Different from Kahle’s (1983), Maslow’s (1970a), and Schwartz’ (1992) value theories, the framework was specifically associated with spectator sports and is expected to better predict spectator sport behavior than does a scale measuring motivations of sports fans.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Shiue Gau & Jeffrey D. James, 2013. "A Ten-Value-Type Framework Associated With Spectator Sports," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:2158244013485580
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013485580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013485580
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013485580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holbrook, Morris B., 2006. "Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 714-725, June.
    2. Belk, Russell W & Wallendorf, Melanie & Sherry, John F, Jr, 1989. "The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    2. Manoël Pénicaud & Anne-Gaëlle Jolivot, 2023. "Consuming the Divine Grace: Circulations and Ritual Reuses of Votive Materiality in Pilgrimage Spaces [Consommer la grâce divine : Circulations et réutilisations rituelles de la matérialité votive ," Post-Print hal-04355357, HAL.
    3. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    5. Anne Sorensen & Judy Drennan, 2017. "Understanding value-creating practices in social media-based brand communities," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(15-16), pages 986-1007, December.
    6. Reema Nofal & Pelin Bayram & Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali & Lu’ay Al-Mu’ani, 2022. "The Effect of eWOM Source on Purchase Intention: The Moderation Role of Weak-Tie eWOM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Pizzetti, Marta & Chereau, Philippe & Soscia, Isabella & Teng, Fangyuan, 2023. "Attitudes and intentions toward masstige strategies: A cross-cultural study of French and Chinese consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Merchant, Altaf & Rose, Gregory & Martin, Drew & Choi, Sunmee & Gour, Mohit, 2017. "Cross-cultural folk-tale-elicitation research on the perceived power, humanistic and religious symbolisms, and use of money," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 113-119.
    9. Sunyoung Hlee & Jimin Lee & Daeseop Moon & Changsok Yoo, 0. "The acceptance of ‘intelligent trade shows’: Visitors’ evaluations of IS innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    10. Emi Moriuchi & Michael Basil, 2019. "The Sustainability of Ohanami Cherry Blossom Festivals as a Cultural Icon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Veronique Cova & Diego Rinallo, 2015. "Revisiting the separation between sacred and profane: Boundary-work in pilgrimage experiences," Post-Print hal-01492432, HAL.
    12. Compeau, Larry D. & Monroe, Kent B. & Grewal, Dhruv & Reynolds, Kristy, 2016. "Expressing and defining self and relationships through everyday shopping experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1035-1042.
    13. Pham Ngoc Thuy & Le Nguyen Hau & Nguyen Kim Ngoc Duyen, 2019. "A value perspective of service interaction quality: the case of immigrants returning to native countries as medical tourists," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Manoela Lawall Radtke & Stefânia Ordovás de Almeida & Lélis Balestrin Espartel, 2022. "What Brought Me Here? Different Consumer Journeys for Practices of Sustainable Disposal through Takeback Programmes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Hammad Sheikh & Jeremy Ginges & Alin Coman & Scott Atran, 2012. "Religion, group threat and sacred values," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(2), pages 110-118, March.
    16. Jonas Holmqvist & Luca Visconti & Christian Grönroos & Blandine Guais & Aurélie Kessous, 2020. "Understanding the value process: Value creation in a luxury service context," Post-Print hal-03511392, HAL.
    17. Muhammad, Nabeel & Léo-Paul, Dana, 2015. "Collective Efficacy of a Regional Network: Extending the Social Embeddedness Perspective of Entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 70120, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Holak, Susan L., 2008. "Ritual blessings with companion animals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 534-541, May.
    19. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Devi, Rita & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Assessing co-creation based competitive advantage through consumers’ need for differentiation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Ronald Hill, 2008. "Disadvantaged Consumers: An Ethical Approach to Consumption by the Poor," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 77-83, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:2158244013485580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.