IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241266919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Family Development Ability: The Treatment Effect of Family Savings: Empirical Evidence From a Generalized Propensity Score Matching Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Aihui Wu
  • Cuntong Wang

Abstract

Based on the theory of asset building, this study provides an in-depth analysis of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) conducted in 2016. The main objective is to examine the measurement structure of China’s family development ability and explore the relationship between the family saving rate, government subsidies, and family development ability using the structural equation modeling approach. Additionally, this research identifies the causal treatment effects of family savings rate and government subsidies on family development ability through propensity score matching and generalized propensity score matching methods. Consequently, it offers a comprehensive analysis of the impact of family savings rate and government subsidies on family development ability. The findings indicate that the influence of government subsidies on improving family development ability is negligible, while the effect of family saving rate on various factors of family development ability is significant. Specifically, the relationship follows an inverted U-shaped curve, with a family saving rate of approximately 35% demonstrating optimal performance. One possible explanation for this trend is that increased family savings instill a sense of future confidence among family members, thereby promoting family development ability. The robustness of these conclusions is confirmed through various causal inference models. These empirical findings provide valuable evidence and serve as a reference for exploring the transformation and development of social policy models in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Aihui Wu & Cuntong Wang, 2024. "Improving Family Development Ability: The Treatment Effect of Family Savings: Empirical Evidence From a Generalized Propensity Score Matching Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241266919
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241266919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241266919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241266919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241266919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.