IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241255456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Validity of the Implicit Beliefs Measure: Focusing on Dimensionality and Discriminability of the CNAAQ-2 (Conceptions of the Nature of Athletic Ability Questionnaire-2) in the Context of South Korean Adolescent Football Players

Author

Listed:
  • Dojin Jang
  • Soowoong Hwang
  • Dongkyun Kang

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to verify the internal and external validity of the construct of implicit beliefs concept in the sports context, the Conceptions of the Nature of Athletic Ability Questionnaire-2 (CNAAQ-2). The data of this study were collected from 322 adolescent football players by using CNAAQ-2 and MT (Mental Toughness) Questionnaires. The CFA was employed to examine internal validity (dimensionality), and the ANOVA with the K-means cluster analysis was conducted to examine external validity (discriminability). The results of the CFA supported convergent and discriminant validity of the specific factors (incremental / entity belief) but did not support the significance of the general factor (implicit beliefs). The results of clustering showed that implicit beliefs propensity is divided into three clusters. ANOVA, which set these clusters as an independent variable, showed significant differences for the MT. Based on these results, considerations in the utilization of CNAAQ-2 were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dojin Jang & Soowoong Hwang & Dongkyun Kang, 2024. "Revisiting the Validity of the Implicit Beliefs Measure: Focusing on Dimensionality and Discriminability of the CNAAQ-2 (Conceptions of the Nature of Athletic Ability Questionnaire-2) in the Context o," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255456
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241255456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241255456
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241255456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.