IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241248891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Leads? Who Follows? Exploring Agenda Setting by Media, Social Bots and Public in the Discussion of the 2022 South Korean Presidential Election

Author

Listed:
  • Menghan Zhang
  • Xue Qi
  • Xinyan Liu
  • Ke Zhang

Abstract

Social media not only changes the traditional communication environment but also brings new changes to agenda-setting. The main body of agenda-setting has shifted from the traditional media to the politicians, political parties and grassroots people. With the increasing use of social bots in public opinion manipulation and political election interference, whether they can participate in or influence agenda-setting has become an urgent concern. So far, there has been less literature focusing on engagement in agenda-setting for social bots. This paper studies the social media discussion content of the South Korean presidential election, determines the participation of social bots, and explores the connection between media agenda, bot agenda, and public agenda from the perspective of agenda setting. This study finds that while the main agendas of media, social bots, and the public are not the same, their agendas are relevant. In addition, the media agenda is not timely ahead of the bot agenda and the public agenda, and the time order only appears between the social bots and the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Menghan Zhang & Xue Qi & Xinyan Liu & Ke Zhang, 2024. "Who Leads? Who Follows? Exploring Agenda Setting by Media, Social Bots and Public in the Discussion of the 2022 South Korean Presidential Election," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241248891
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241248891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241248891
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241248891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menghan Zhang & Ze Chen & Xue Qi & Jun Liu, 2022. "Could Social Bots’ Sentiment Engagement Shape Humans’ Sentiment on COVID-19 Vaccine Discussion on Twitter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Menghan Zhang & Xue Qi & Ze Chen & Jun Liu, 2022. "Social Bots’ Involvement in the COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. McClosky, Herbert & Chong, Dennis, 1985. "Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 329-363, July.
    4. Deva Woodly, 2008. "New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 109-123, January.
    5. Kai-Cheng Yang & Emilio Ferrara & Filippo Menczer, 2022. "Botometer 101: social bot practicum for computational social scientists," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1511-1528, November.
    6. Steven Lehrer & Tian Xie & Tao Zeng, 2021. "Does High-Frequency Social Media Data Improve Forecasts of Low-Frequency Consumer Confidence Measures? [Regression Models with Mixed Sampling Frequencies]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 910-933.
    7. Chengcheng Shao & Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia & Onur Varol & Kai-Cheng Yang & Alessandro Flammini & Filippo Menczer, 2018. "The spread of low-credibility content by social bots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenkai Zhou & Chi Zhang & Linwan Wu & Meghana Shashidhar, 2023. "ChatGPT and marketing: Analyzing public discourse in early Twitter posts," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 693-706, December.
    2. Zixuan Weng & Aijun Lin, 2022. "Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Casey A. Klofstad & Joseph E. Uscinski & Jennifer M. Connolly & Jonathan P. West, 2019. "What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. John Higgins & Tarun Sabarwal, 2023. "Control and spread of contagion in networks with global effects," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(6), pages 1149-1187, December.
    5. Xia, Huosong & Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Zheng, Leven J. & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Arya, Varsha, 2023. "COVID-19 fake news detection: A hybrid CNN-BiLSTM-AM model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    6. Philip E. Tetlock & Gregory Mitchell & L. Jason Anastasopoulos, 2013. "Detecting and Punishing Unconscious Bias," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(1), pages 83-110.
    7. Maria Besiou & Mark Hunter & Luk Wassenhove, 2013. "A Web of Watchdogs: Stakeholder Media Networks and Agenda-Setting in Response to Corporate Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 709-729, December.
    8. Csaba Both & Nima Dehmamy & Rose Yu & Albert-László Barabási, 2023. "Accelerating network layouts using graph neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Kostas Zafiropoulos & Vasiliki Vrana & Dimitrios Vagianos, 2012. "Bloggers’ Community Characteristics and Influence within Greek Political Blogosphere," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Lehrer, Steven & Xie, Tian & Zhang, Xinyu, 2021. "Social media sentiment, model uncertainty, and volatility forecasting," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Itziar Castelló & Mette Morsing & Friederike Schultz, 2013. "Communicative Dynamics and the Polyphony of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Network Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 683-694, December.
    12. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2023. "AI-generated lemons: a sour outlook for content producers?," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277971, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Wentao Xu & Kazutoshi Sasahara, 2022. "Characterizing the roles of bots on Twitter during the COVID-19 infodemic," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 591-609, May.
    14. John Higgins & Tarun Sabarwal, 2021. "Control and Spread of Contagion in Networks," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202111, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    15. Suzanne Elayan & Martin Sykora, 2024. "Digital intermediaries in pandemic times: social media and the role of bots in communicating emotions and stress about Coronavirus," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2481-2504, December.
    16. Li Zhang & Peinan Wang, 2022. "Public Attitude and Opinion Leaders: Mapping Chinese Discussion of EU's Energy Role on Social Media," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1777-1796, November.
    17. Steven F. Lehrer & Tian Xie, 2022. "The Bigger Picture: Combining Econometrics with Analytics Improves Forecasts of Movie Success," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 189-210, January.
    18. Matthew Feinberg & Elisabeth Wehling, 2018. "A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, April.
    19. Yuye Zhou & Jiangang Xu & Maosen Yin & Jun Zeng & Haolin Ming & Yiwen Wang, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution of Public Sentiment Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Small Cities of China: A Case Study Based on Social Media Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Andrey Dmitriev & Victor Dmitriev & Stepan Balybin, 2019. "Self-Organized Criticality on Twitter: Phenomenological Theory and Empirical Investigation Based on Data Analysis Results," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241248891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.