IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i1p21582440241232789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could Digital Literacy Contribute to the Improvement of Green Production Efficiency in Agriculture?

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Gong
  • Ziye Sun
  • Bo Wang
  • Zhigang Yu

Abstract

The digital development in rural areas has become an important driving force for promoting green production in agriculture. But the lack of digital skills among farmers remains a problem. The main reason why farmers cannot master digital skills well is their lack of digital literacy, which leads to market information asymmetry and the inability to truly distinguish the difference between green production and traditional production. Based on this, this article uses field research methods to collect data from 1,116 farmers in China, calculates agricultural green production efficiency using the SBM model, and empirically tests the relationship between farmers’ digital literacy and green production efficiency in agriculture. The results showed that digital literacy has a significant promoting effect on agricultural green production efficiency. Secondly, it was found that digital literacy can effectively enhance farmers’ cognition of green agricultural products and green production technology adoption. Among them, the effect of cognition of green agricultural products is reflected in farmers’ self-cognition and market cognition. The green production technology adoption is reflected in the breadth and depth of technology adoption. Third, we discuss the effect of different dimensions of digital literacy on agricultural green production efficiency. The effect of the digital literacy on the production efficiency of the five typical green technologies used by farmers is further discussed. Although there are certain differences, overall, they all have a significant promoting effect. It is necessary to comprehensively improve farmers’ digital literacy, bridge the digital divide and promote the green transformation of agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Gong & Ziye Sun & Bo Wang & Zhigang Yu, 2024. "Could Digital Literacy Contribute to the Improvement of Green Production Efficiency in Agriculture?," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241232789
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241232789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241232789
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241232789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McGrath, Karen & Brown, Claire & Regan, Áine & Russell, Tomás, 2023. "Investigating narratives and trends in digital agriculture: A scoping study of social and behavioural science studies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Stephen K. Wegren, 2014. "Human capital and Russia's agricultural future," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 537-554, December.
    3. S. Kumari & P. Raghuram & V.G. Venkatesh & Y. Shi, 2022. "Future Perspectives on Progressive Farming with Adoption of Virtual Reality Technology for Sustainable Quality in Agriculture," Post-Print hal-04445045, HAL.
    4. Puneet Vatsa & Junpeng Li & Phong Quoc Luu & Julio Cesar Botero‐R, 2023. "Internet use and consumption diversity: Evidence from rural China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1287-1308, August.
    5. Tone, Kaoru & Toloo, Mehdi & Izadikhah, Mohammad, 2020. "A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 560-571.
    6. Xingguang Li & Wen Xue & Xuexi Huo, 2023. "Fertilizer application training programs, the adoption of formula fertilization techniques and agricultural productivity: Evidence from 691 apple growers in China," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(2), pages 298-316, May.
    7. Aijun Guo & Xiaoyun Wei & Fanglei Zhong & Penglong Wang & Xiaoyu Song, 2022. "Does Cognition of Resources and the Environment Affect Farmers’ Production Efficiency? Study of Oasis Agriculture in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Xiaoxia Fu & Ping Zhang & Juzhi Zhang, 2017. "Forecasting and Analyzing Internet Users of China with Lotka–Volterra Model," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Zugravu-Soilita, Natalia & Kafrouni, Rajwane & Bouard, Séverine & Apithy, Leïla, 2021. "Do cultural capital and social capital matter for economic performance? An empirical investigation of tribal agriculture in New Caledonia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Huang Xiaobing & Chen Meng, 2022. "The Impact of Internet Use on Community Participation of Older Adults: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    11. Ye, Fei & Ouyang, You & Li, Yina, 2023. "Digital investment and environmental performance: The mediating roles of production efficiency and green innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    13. Hexiong Zhang & Yun Qin & Jinlong Xu & Wenqin Ren, 2023. "Analysis of the Evolution Characteristics and Impact Factors of Green Production Efficiency of Grain in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Siyu Gong & Bo Wang & Zhigang Yu, 2022. "Whether the Use of the Internet Can Assist Farmers in Selecting Biopesticides or Not: A Study Based on Evidence from the Largest Rice-Producing Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Engås, Karen G. & Raja, Jawwad Z. & Neufang, Isabelle Fabienne, 2023. "Decoding technological frames: An exploratory study of access to and meaningful engagement with digital technologies in agriculture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Broekhuizen, T.L.J. & Emrich, O. & Gijsenberg, M.J. & Broekhuis, M. & Donkers, B. & Sloot, L.M., 2021. "Digital platform openness: Drivers, dimensions and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 902-914.
    17. Monchuk, Daniel C. & Chen, Zhuo & Bonaparte, Yosef, 2010. "Explaining production inefficiency in China's agriculture using data envelopment analysis and semi-parametric bootstrapping," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 346-354, June.
    18. Tianyu Qin & Lijun Wang & Yanxin Zhou & Liyue Guo & Gaoming Jiang & Lei Zhang, 2022. "Digital Technology-and-Services-Driven Sustainable Transformation of Agriculture: Cases of China and the EU," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen Shi & Huinan Huang & Yingju Wu & Yung-Ho Chiu & Shijiong Qin, 2020. "Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Production and Crop Disaster Area in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Lai, Aolin & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "How coal de-capacity policy affects renewable energy development efficiency? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    3. Ning Geng & Zengjin Liu & Xuejiao Wang & Lin Meng & Jiayan Pan, 2022. "Measurement of Green Total Factor Productivity and Its Spatial Convergence Test on the Pig-Breeding Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Chongxin Xie & Yun Gao & Yu Zhong & Zhijun Zhao, 2024. "Impact of Digital Agro-Technology Services on Technical Efficiency and Income of Small-Scale Farmers: Empirical Study from Mango Production in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Ciliberti, Stefano & Frascarelli, Angelo & Polenzani, Bianca & Brunori, Gianluca & Martino, Gaetano, 2024. "Digitalisation strategies in the agri-food system: The case of PDO Parmigiano Reggiano," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Lirong Xue & Aiyu Qu & Xiurui Guo & Chunxu Hao, 2024. "Research on Environmental Performance Measurement and Influencing Factors of Key Cities in China Based on Super-Efficiency SBM-Tobit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Aparicio, Juan & Monge, Juan F. & Ramón, Nuria, 2021. "A new measure of technical efficiency in data envelopment analysis based on the maximization of hypervolumes: Benchmarking, properties and computational aspects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 263-275.
    9. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Zhenjie Gong & Yanhu He & Xiaohong Chen, 2022. "Evaluation of Regional Water Use Efficiency under Green and Sustainable Development Using an Improved Super Slack-Based Measure Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Javad Gerami & Mohammad Reza Mozaffari & P. F. Wanke & Henrique Correa, 2022. "A novel slacks-based model for efficiency and super-efficiency in DEA-R," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3373-3410, September.
    12. Lingzhang Kong & Jinye Li, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Zhang, Yuquan W. & Beach, Robert H. & Cai, Yongxia, 2013. "China’s Agriculture under Urbanization: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150782, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Büschken, Joachim, 2009. "When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 647-657, January.
    15. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Honma, Satoshi, 2012. "Environmental and economic efficiencies in the Asia-Pacific region," MPRA Paper 43361, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Thanh‐Tung Nguyen & Trung Thanh Nguyen & Ulrike Grote, 2023. "Internet use and agricultural productivity in rural Vietnam," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1309-1326, August.
    19. Le Sun & Congmou Zhu & Shaofeng Yuan & Lixia Yang & Shan He & Wuyan Li, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emission Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Senhua Huang & Lingming Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from 275 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241232789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.