IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231220492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Nostalgic Memory Retrieval on Anthropomorphism

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroko Nakamura
  • Jun Kawaguchi

Abstract

Nostalgic memory often involves one’s close relationships and fosters a sense of closeness to the target person in the memory. The motivation for social connections is a critical factor behind anthropomorphism (humanizing non-human targets). When people feel lonely, they anthropomorphize non-human targets to fulfill their need for social connection. In contrast, people reverse-anthropomorphize (dehumanize) targets when their sociality motivation is fulfilled. This study clarifies the relationship between nostalgia and anthropomorphism and tests two hypotheses. First, nostalgic memory causes a reverse-anthropomorphism of the target that is unrelated to nostalgic memory because nostalgia fulfills the sociality motivation. Second, a nostalgic memory about a target fosters its humanization because people feel close to the target in their nostalgic memory. We conducted two online experiments and analyzed data from 252 participants. They were assigned several tasks, including memory retrieval, loneliness checks, assessing nostalgia proneness, and ascertaining their closeness to the target. The results indicated that nostalgic memories reverse-anthropomorphized unfamiliar targets, while nostalgic memories about a target fostered targeted anthropomorphism.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroko Nakamura & Jun Kawaguchi, 2023. "Effect of Nostalgic Memory Retrieval on Anthropomorphism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231220492
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231220492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231220492
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231220492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine E. Loveland & Dirk Smeesters & Naomi Mandel, 2010. "Still Preoccupied with 1995: The Need to Belong and Preference for Nostalgic Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 393-408, October.
    2. Joseph Henrich & Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "Most people are not WEIRD," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7302), pages 29-29, July.
    3. Xinyue Zhou & Tim Wildschut & Constantine Sedikides & Kan Shi & Cong Feng, 2012. "Nostalgia: The Gift That Keeps on Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 39-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilar Rojas Gaviria, 2012. "Three essays on how sharing and consuming support home place reconnection in contemporary liquid times," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/209597, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Kwan, Canice M.C. & Cheng, Shirley Y.Y. & Tsang, Alex S.L., 2023. "Societal reminiscence and decisions for a better society: A belief in progress explanation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Hartmann, Benjamin J. & Brunk, Katja H., 2019. "Nostalgia marketing and (re-)enchantment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 669-686.
    4. Sung Youl Jun & Hye Kyung Park & Kyung Ho Kim, 2022. "The effects of nostalgia marketing on consumers’ brand extension evaluation," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 271-286, May.
    5. Kun Zhou & Xiaoyin Ye & Jun Ye, 2021. "Longing for the past and embracing the new: Does nostalgia increase new product adoption?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 477-498, December.
    6. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    7. Bouma, J.A. & Nguyen, Binh & van der Heijden, Eline & Dijk, J.J., 2018. "Analysing Group Contract Design Using a Lab and a Lab-in-the-Field Threshold Public Good Experiment," Discussion Paper 2018-049, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Valencia Caicedo, Felipe & Dohmen, Thomas & Pondorfer, Andreas, 2023. "Religion and cooperation across the globe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 479-489.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1392-1412 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ran Xu & Navid Ghaffarzadegan, 2018. "Neuroscience bridging scientific disciplines in health: Who builds the bridge, who pays for it?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1183-1204, November.
    11. Justina GineikienÄ—, 2013. "Consumer Nostalgia Literature Review And An Alternative Measurement Perspective," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    12. Cornand, Camille & Hubert, Paul, 2020. "On the external validity of experimental inflation forecasts: A comparison with five categories of field expectations," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Hawkins, Matthew A., 2020. "The moderating effect of need for belonging and communal-brand connection on counterfeit purchasing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Michael Muthukrishna & Joseph Henrich & Wataru Toyokawa & Takeshi Hamamura & Tatsuya Kameda & Steven J Heine, 2018. "Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, August.
    15. Renaud Foucart & Jonathan H. W. Tan, 2024. "A test of loyalty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 109-137, August.
    16. Zhou, Ling & Wang, Tao & Zhang, Qin & Mou, Yupeng, 2013. "Consumer insecurity and preference for nostalgic products: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2406-2411.
    17. Matthew Hawkins, 2020. "The moderating effect of need for belonging and communal-brand connection on counterfeit purchasing," Post-Print hal-02943037, HAL.
    18. James Derbyshire & Mandeep Dhami & Ian Belton & Dilek Önkal, 2023. "The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), June.
    19. Ingo S. Seifert & Julia M. Rohrer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2021. "The Development of the Rank-Order Stability of the Big Five across the Life Span," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1156, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    20. Bria Long & Judith E. Fan & Holly Huey & Zixian Chai & Michael C. Frank, 2024. "Parallel developmental changes in children’s production and recognition of line drawings of visual concepts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    21. Manpreet Blessin & Sophie Lehmann & Angela M. Kunzler & Rolf van Dick & Klaus Lieb, 2022. "Resilience Interventions Conducted in Western and Eastern Countries—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231220492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.