IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231214873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-learning Acceptance in Face-to-Face Universities due to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Estriegana
  • Jose-Amelio Medina-Merodio
  • Rafael Robina-Ramírez
  • Roberto Barchino
  • Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented shifts in higher education worldwide. These sudden educational changes have the potential to accelerate the acceptance of online learning, or, conversely, to increase its rejection. The purpose of this experimental study is to examine students’ acceptance of and intentions toward the continued use of online learning, which was abruptly introduced by face-to-face universities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, responses to an online questionnaire from students at three face-to-face universities ( N  = 194) were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The study was based on the technology acceptance model (TAM), we also included other relevant factors, such as emotional aspects, feelings of uncertainty, security of the e-learning system, and satisfaction with educational technology. The results indicate that the uncertainty associated with COVID-19, emotional factors, and security did not significantly affect the students’ intention to use e-learning systems; however, these factors had a significant impact on students’ perception of satisfaction, which is a decisive factor that positively influences the process of adoption of e-learning systems. This study discusses noteworthy theoretical and practical implications for education that will help teachers and universities in decision making regarding the digital transformation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Estriegana & Jose-Amelio Medina-Merodio & Rafael Robina-Ramírez & Roberto Barchino & Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero, 2023. "E-learning Acceptance in Face-to-Face Universities due to COVID-19," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231214873
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231214873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231214873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231214873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Okaily, Manaf & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alsaad, Abdallah & Taamneh, Abdallah & Alsyouf, Adi, 2020. "The Determinants of Digital Payment Systems’ Acceptance under Cultural Orientation Differences: The Case of Uncertainty Avoidance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Long Pham & Stan Williamson & Ronald Berry, 2018. "Student Perceptions of E-Learning Service Quality, E-Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 14(3), pages 19-40, July.
    3. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    4. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E., 2022. "Immersive on-the-job training module development and modeling users’ behavior using parametric multi-group analysis: A modified educational technology acceptance model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    3. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Manaf Al-Okaily & Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Farah Shishan & Ahmed Al-Dmour & Rasha Alghazzawi & Malek Alsharairi, 2021. "Sustainable FinTech Innovation Orientation: A Moderated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Wajeeha Aslam & Annas Hussain & Kashif Farhat & Imtiaz Arif, 2020. "Underlying Factors Influencing Consumers’ Trust and Loyalty in E-commerce," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 186-204, July.
    6. Siwei Sun & Fangyu Zhang & Kaicheng Liao & Victor Chang, 2021. "Determine Factors of NFC Mobile Payment Continuous Adoption in Shopping Malls: Evidence From Indonesia," International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    8. Li, Manning & Mao, Jiye, 2015. "Hedonic or utilitarian? Exploring the impact of communication style alignment on user's perception of virtual health advisory services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 229-243.
    9. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi, 2019. "Chat now… Examining the variables influencing the use of online live chat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 55-67.
    10. Asrar Ahmed Sabir & Iftikhar Ahmad & Hassan Ahmad & Muhammad Rafiq & Muhammad Asghar Khan & Neelum Noreen, 2023. "Consumer Acceptance and Adoption of AI Robo-Advisors in Fintech Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Pillet, Jean-Charles & Carillo, Kevin Daniel André, 2016. "Email-free collaboration: An exploratory study on the formation of new work habits among knowledge workers," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 113-125.
    12. Daniel Fett & Joris Dehler-Holland & Markus Schmutz, 2021. "A survey on the user acceptance of PV battery storage systems," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 161-171, June.
    13. Giacomo Migliore & Ralf Wagner & Felipe Schneider Cechella & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2022. "Antecedents to the Adoption of Mobile Payment in China and Italy: an Integration of UTAUT2 and Innovation Resistance Theory," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2099-2122, December.
    14. Tazizur Rahman & Yang Sok Kim & Mijin Noh & Choong Kwon Lee, 2020. "Determinants of social commerce adoption in an emerging economy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 479-502, December.
    15. Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Mohammed Quaddus, 2015. "Radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption: A cross-sectional comparison of voluntary and mandatory contexts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1057-1076, October.
    16. PC Lai, 2019. "The Effects of Efficiency, Design and Enjoyment on Single Platform E-payment," Research in Business and Management, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 19-34, August.
    17. Yueh-Ying Tsai & Cheng-Min Chao & Hong-Mau Lin & Bor-Wen Cheng, 2018. "Nursing staff intentions to continuously use a blended e-learning system from an integrative perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2495-2513, November.
    18. Mütterlein, Joschka & Kunz, Reinhard E. & Baier, Daniel, 2019. "Effects of lead-usership on the acceptance of media innovations: A mobile augmented reality case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 113-124.
    19. Jaklič, Jurij & Grublješič, Tanja & Popovič, Aleš, 2018. "The role of compatibility in predicting business intelligence and analytics use intentions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 305-318.
    20. Minh Ha Nguyen & Bui Thanh Khoa, 2019. "Perceived Mental Benefit in Electronic Commerce: Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231214873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.