IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v35y2015i2p229-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedonic or utilitarian? Exploring the impact of communication style alignment on user's perception of virtual health advisory services

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Manning
  • Mao, Jiye

Abstract

Intelligent advisory services are becoming increasingly pervasive. Ranging from e-Commerce to e-Government platforms, intelligent advisory systems, with user-centered design, can potentially overcome technical barriers that commonly exist on traditional websites. This study explores the impact of system–user communication style similarities on the user's perception towards the virtual advisory service in the healthcare domain. Drawing on Similarity-Attraction Theory, we propose a research framework to investigate this relationship. Through a mixed-method approach, including preliminary surveys, experiments and follow-up interviews, this study shows that an intelligent advisory system's communication style, when aligned well with a user's communication style, can better engage the user and lead to more perceived transparency, enjoyment, informativeness and credibility during the interaction process. Overall, hedonic aspects of user perceptions are shown to be more critical for creating a feeling of social presence and reuse intentions than utilitarian ones. The implications of the study for research and practice are then discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Manning & Mao, Jiye, 2015. "Hedonic or utilitarian? Exploring the impact of communication style alignment on user's perception of virtual health advisory services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 229-243.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:35:y:2015:i:2:p:229-243
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401214001248
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell W. Belk, 2013. "Extended Self in a Digital World," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 477-500.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    3. Fang, Xiang & Yen, David C., 2006. "Demographics and behavior of Internet users in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 363-387.
    4. Stephen P. Smith & Robert B. Johnston & Steve Howard, 2011. "Putting Yourself in the Picture: An Evaluation of Virtual Model Technology as an Online Shopping Tool," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 640-659, September.
    5. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman & Yiu-Fai Yung, 2000. "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 22-42, May.
    6. P. De Pelsmacker & M. Geuens & P. Anckaert, 2002. "Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context-ad similarity," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 02/162, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    8. Ebrahim Mazaheri & Marie-Odile Richard & Michel Laroche, 2010. "Investigating the Moderating Impact of Hedonism on Online Consumer Behavior," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 123-134, March.
    9. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    10. Heather L. O'Brien & Mahria Lebow, 2013. "Mixed-methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(8), pages 1543-1556, August.
    11. Nigel Ford, 2004. "Modeling cognitive processes in information seeking: From Popper to Pask," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(9), pages 769-782, July.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Heather L. O'Brien & Mahria Lebow, 2013. "Mixed‐methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(8), pages 1543-1556, August.
    14. Foshay, Neil & Kuziemsky, Craig, 2014. "Towards an implementation framework for business intelligence in healthcare," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 20-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Stefko & Radovan Bacik & Richard Fedorko & Maria Olearova, 2022. "Gender-generation characteristic in relation to the customer behavior and purchasing process in terms of mobile marketing," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 181-223, March.
    2. Qiulian Shen & Yuxuan Du & Jingxian Huang, 2024. "Consumer Citizenship Behavior in Online/Offline Shopping Contexts: Differential Impact of Consumer Perceived Value and Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Thai Ha Nguyen & Lena Waizenegger & Angsana A. Techatassanasoontorn, 2022. "“Don’t Neglect the User!” – Identifying Types of Human-Chatbot Interactions and their Associated Characteristics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 797-838, June.
    4. Kim, Ki-Hun & Kim, Kwang-Jae & Lee, Dae-Ho & Kim, Min-Geun, 2019. "Identification of critical quality dimensions for continuance intention in mHealth services: Case study of onecare service," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 187-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    3. Avornyo, Philip & Fang, Jiaming & Antwi, Collins Opoku & Aboagye, Michael Osei & Boadi, Evans Asante, 2019. "Are customers still with us? The influence of optimum stimulation level and IT-specific traits on mobile banking discontinuous usage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 348-360.
    4. Jaklič, Jurij & Grublješič, Tanja & Popovič, Aleš, 2018. "The role of compatibility in predicting business intelligence and analytics use intentions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 305-318.
    5. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    6. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    7. Gabor Aranyi & Paul Schaik, 2015. "Modeling user experience with news websites," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2471-2493, December.
    8. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin, 2021. "Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1045-1069, May.
    9. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Kostas Zafiropoulos & Ioannis Karavasilis & Vasiliki Vrana, 2012. "Assessing the Adoption of e-Government Services by Teachers in Greece," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    13. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    14. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    15. Amit Shankar & Biplab Datta, 2018. "Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption Intention: An Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 72-89, June.
    16. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Ruhul Amin & Abdullah Al Masud & Md. Imran Hossain & Mohammad Awal Hossen & Mohammad Kamal Hossain, 2023. "What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    17. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    19. Li, Han & Gupta, Ashish & Zhang, Jie & Flor, Nick, 2020. "Who will use augmented reality? An integrated approach based on text analytics and field survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 502-516.
    20. Xinlu Wen & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2023. "Determining the Key Drivers for the Acceptance and Usage of AR and VR in Cultural Heritage Monuments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:35:y:2015:i:2:p:229-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.