IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i2p21582440231179632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perceived Affordances and Challenges in the Newly Introduced OKR-Based Performance Appraisal System in an Omani HEI

Author

Listed:
  • Zulaikha Al-Saadi
  • Wafaa Al-Maawali
  • Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali
  • Ibtisam Al Rushaidi

Abstract

Performance appraisal (PA) is a valuable tool used by organizations to improve and enhance their employees’ competencies and ensure their organizational capability to cope with a dynamic world. The newly introduced Objectives and Key Results (OKR) PA system in Oman has been a source of concern and controversial debate among governmental employees, particularly academics. This exploratory study aims to address the following research questions: (1) What are the perceived affordances of OKR metrics? (2) What difficulties have most academics experienced with the new PA system? (3) What are the perceived challenges in coping with the requirements of OKR metrics? The necessary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 11 academic staff members at University of Technology and Applied Sciences—Rustaq. The findings of this study have the potential to inform decisions of line managers and any developing performance appraisal system to incorporate types of training suitable to the needs of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Zulaikha Al-Saadi & Wafaa Al-Maawali & Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali & Ibtisam Al Rushaidi, 2023. "The Perceived Affordances and Challenges in the Newly Introduced OKR-Based Performance Appraisal System in an Omani HEI," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231179632
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231179632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231179632
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231179632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André de Waal & Robert Goedegebuure & Patricia Geradts, 2011. "The impact of performance management on the results of a non‐profit organization," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(8), pages 778-796, November.
    2. Tomi J. Kallio & Kirsi-Mari Kallio & Mira Huusko & Riitta Pyykkö & Jussi Kivistö, 2021. "Balancing between accountability and autonomy: the impact and relevance of public steering mechanisms within higher education," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(6), pages 46-68, July.
    3. Nickson Herbert Odongo & Daoping Wang & Shaldon Leparan Suntu & Obadia Kyetuza Bishoge, 2019. "Dimensions of organisational performance: a review," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(1/2), pages 114-129.
    4. Ahmed Ramadan Khtere, 2020. "Performance Appraisal of Faculty Members Based on Internal Quality Assurance System: A Delphi Study," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(6), pages 1-87, December.
    5. Sajid Hussain Awan & Nazia Habib & Chaudhry Shoaib Akhtar & Shaheryar Naveed, 2020. "Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana Lopes de Araújo & Lucas Soares Caldas & Bruna Stamm Barreto & Pedro Paulo Murce Menezes & Júlia Cássia dos Santos Silvério & Laís Campos Rodrigues & André Luiz Marques Serrano & Clóvis Neumann, 2024. "How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Performance Management Systems? An Overview of the Literature and a Proposed Integrative Model," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Bei Lyu & Weilin Su & Qian Qi & Fujun Xiao, 2023. "The Influence of Performance Appraisal Justice on Employee Job Performance: A Dual Path Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    3. Steven D. Silver, 2021. "Dynamics of Negative Evaluations in the Information Exchange of Interactive Decision-Making Teams: Advancing the Design of Technology-Augmented GDSS," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1621-1642, December.
    4. Aleksandra Vujko & Darko Vuković & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Olgica Zečević Stanojević & Leposava Zečević, 2022. "The Nexus between Employee Engagement and Performance Management Processes—Fruška Gora National Park (Serbia) Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Nimnual Visedsun & Kanitsorn Terdpaopong, 2021. "The Effects of the Strategy and Goal on Business Performance as Mediated by Management Accounting Systems," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Aditya Ari Yudhanto & Emma Rochima & Rivani, 2023. "Strategic Entrepreneurship and the Performance of Women-Owned Fish Processing Units in Cibinong District, Bogor Regency," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2021. "Linkage between Leaders’ Behaviour in Performance Management, Organisational Justice and Work Engagement in Public Sector," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Ralph Andre C. Roque & Jan Gabriel I. Garbo & Kirstien Paola E. Robas & Satria Fadil Persada & Reny Nadlifatin, 2022. "Determining the Factors Affecting a Career Shifter’s Use of Software Testing Tools amidst the COVID-19 Crisis in the Philippines: TTF-TAM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231179632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.