IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i1p21582440221148145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Company Success Factors in Creating High-Quality Innovative Food Products

Author

Listed:
  • Sik Sumaedi
  • Tri Rakhmawati
  • Nidya J. Astrini
  • Medi Yarmen
  • I. Gede Mahatma Yuda Bakti
  • Sih Damayanti

Abstract

Technological advancements have triggered many lifestyle changes and indirectly created two important issues that must be addressed in Indonesia: the increase in non-communicable diseases and the rise of national health costs. One effort to curtail these problems involves consuming innovative food products with health benefits, commonly known as functional foods. The present study aims to identify and analyze the key success factors that companies in the functional food industry must consider to produce high-quality functional foods. To date, no previous study has paid close attention to this issue. Data collection was performed in a two-step process. First, interviews with academics, businesses, and the government were conducted. Second, surveys using a pairwise comparison questionnaire were completed. Data from the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, while survey data were assessed using the analytic hierarchy process. The results indicate the presence of five key success factors, including top management commitment (weight = 0.233), research resources and networks (0.077), food safety management systems (0.303), access to the required raw materials (0.218), and access to information on consumer needs (0.168). This research is believed to be the first to identify key company success factors in producing high-quality, innovative food products. This research fills the void of functional food literature related to producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sik Sumaedi & Tri Rakhmawati & Nidya J. Astrini & Medi Yarmen & I. Gede Mahatma Yuda Bakti & Sih Damayanti, 2023. "Key Company Success Factors in Creating High-Quality Innovative Food Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440221148145
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221148145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221148145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221148145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmundas Jasinskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Biruta Svagzdiene & Arturas Simanavicius, 2016. "Impact of hotel service quality on the loyalty of customers," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 559-572, January.
    2. Mitsunori Hirogaki, 2021. "Willingness to Pay for Functional Foods in Europe and Asia: An Empirical Study in the UK and Japan," Micro & Macro Marketing, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 593-614.
    3. Shrestha, Ram K. & Alavalapati, Janaki R. R. & Kalmbacher, Robert S., 2004. "Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 185-199, September.
    4. Ghosh, B. C. & Liang, Tan Wee & Meng, Tan Teck & Chan, Ben, 2001. "The key success factors, distinctive capabilities, and strategic thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 209-221, March.
    5. Ernest H Forman & Mary Ann Selly, 2001. "Decision by Objectives:How to Convince Others That You are Right," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 4281, October.
    6. Qiao-Yu Warren Cai, 2021. "Constructing Assessment Indicators Weight System of Digital Business Chinese Materials," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    7. Hesham Magd & Nasser Kadasah & Adrienne Curry, 2003. "ISO 9000 implementation: a study of manufacturing companies in Saudi Arabia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 313-322, June.
    8. Ho, Ying-Chin & Chang, Ou-Chuan & Wang, Wen-Bo, 2008. "An empirical study of key success factors for Six Sigma Green Belt projects at an Asian MRO company," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 263-269.
    9. repec:eme:maj000:02686900310488258 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    2. Ilir Sallata, 2023. "Albania and China: A Historical Observation of the World Press - The Beginnig of The’70s in 20th Century," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, January -.
    3. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Mansoureh Abdi & Mandana Azadegan-Mehr, 2010. "Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 24-48, November.
    4. Zelin Liu & Xiyan Duan & Hongling Cheng & Zhaoran Liu & Ping Li & Yang Zhang, 2023. "Empowering High-Quality Development of the Chinese Sports Education Market in Light of the “Double Reduction” Policy: A Hybrid SWOT-AHP Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Matta, Jagannadha & Alavalapati, Janaki & Tanner, George, 2007. "A framework for developing marked-based policies to further biodiversity on non-industrial private forests (NIPF)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 779-788, April.
    6. Omkar Joshi & Rajan Parajuli & Gehendra Kharel & Neelam C Poudyal & Eric Taylor, 2018. "Stakeholder opinions on scientific forest management policy implementation in Nepal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Cynthia J. Mkong & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Paul Martin Dontsop-Nguezet & Zoumana Bamba & Victor Manyong & Godlove Shu, 2021. "Determinant of University Students’ Choices and Preferences of Agricultural Sub-Sector Engagement in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Syed Hammad Mian & Bashir Salah & Wadea Ameen & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    9. Chanthawong, Anuman & Dhakal, Shobhakar, 2016. "Stakeholders' perceptions on challenges and opportunities for biodiesel and bioethanol policy development in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 189-206.
    10. Tiffany Hutcheson & Graeme Newell, 2018. "Decision-making in property Investment by Property Fund Managers," ERES eres2018_295, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    11. Parra-López, Carlos & Reina-Usuga, Liliana & Carmona-Torres, Carmen & Sayadi, Samir & Klerkx, Laurens, 2021. "Digital transformation of the agrifood system: Quantifying the conditioning factors to inform policy planning in the olive sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Wendel Alex Castro Silva & Luciano de Oliveira Fuscaldi Neves & Andréia de Oliveira Santos, 2017. "Six Sigma Methodology: Is It a Success Factor for Companies?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 179-188, May.
    13. Ustaoglu, E. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2020. "Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Pendik district of Istanbul, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Hannu Littunen & Timo Tohmo & Esa Storhammar, 2021. "Innovation among SMEs in Finland: The impact of stakeholder engagement and firm-level characteristics," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(4), pages 157-196.
    15. Ali Azarnivand & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, 2017. "A Multi-level Strategic Group Decision Making for Understanding and Analysis of Sustainable Watershed Planning in Response to Environmental Perplexities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 629-648, May.
    16. Elżbieta M. Zębek & Jakub J. Zięty, 2022. "Effect of Landfill Arson to a “Lax” System in a Circular Economy under the Current EU Energy Policy: Perspective Review in Waste Management Law," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & de Cesare, Sergio, 2013. "Electronic information sharing in local government authorities: Factors influencing the decision-making process," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 816-830.
    18. Uddin, Mohammad Nizam & Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf & Chen, Yong & Siriwong, Wapakorn & Boonyanuphap, Jaruntorn, 2019. "Stakeholders' perception on indigenous community-based management of village common forests in Chittagong hill tracts, Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 102-112.
    19. Kenneth Dunn & Lori Unruh Snyder & James McCarter & Gregory Frey & Joshua Idassi & David Schnake & Frederick Cubbage, 2021. "Bioeconomic Assessment of an Alley Cropping Field Trial in North Carolina, U.S.: Tree Density, Timber Production, and Forage Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Martin-Rojas, Rodrigo & Garcia-Morales, Victor J. & Gonzalez-Alvarez, Nuria, 2019. "Technological antecedents of entrepreneurship and its consequences for organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 22-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440221148145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.