IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221101053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Transformation of Residential Segregation in the Pearl River Delta, China: A Planning-Driven Form

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Gong
  • Yanning Wei

Abstract

Constrained by the hukou system and market mechanisms, Chinese rural migrants normally live in dormitories and urban villages (villages-in-the-city or chengzhongcun ) quite distinct from the dwellings of more privileged social groups yet they are often located quite close together. This pattern may be described as a hukou -based yet market-driven form of residential segregation. This paper addresses an extreme level of segregation in China’s newest urban developments. By examining six key development zones in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), this paper argues that besides hukou and the market, urban planning contextualized in state-market engagement and socialist features is a crucial factor creating extreme residential segregation in these zones. This paper also argues that two planning instruments—large-scale land use zoning and the provision of public housing to migrants—play a significant role in creating segregation. The extreme segregation created by the state’s dominant planning practices in new urban developments demonstrates a transformation of China’s prevalent market-driven segregation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Gong & Yanning Wei, 2022. "The Transformation of Residential Segregation in the Pearl River Delta, China: A Planning-Driven Form," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221101053
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221101053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221101053
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221101053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John R. Logan & Yiping Fang & Zhanxin Zhang, 2009. "Access to Housing in Urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 914-935, December.
    2. Michael C. Lens & Paavo Monkkonen, 2016. "Do Strict Land Use Regulations Make Metropolitan Areas More Segregated by Income?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(1), pages 6-21, January.
    3. Michael G. Bisciglia, 2014. "Segregation and Hispanic Homicide," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, January.
    4. Sonia Hirt, 2015. "The rules of residential segregation: US housing taxonomies and their precedents," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 367-395, July.
    5. Julie T. Miao, 2019. "Planning Particularities: Reinterpreting Urban Planning in China with the Case of Chengdu," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 512-536, August.
    6. Yue Ray Gong, 2016. "Rental housing management as surveillance of Chinese rural migrants: the case of hillside compound in Dongguan," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 998-1018, November.
    7. Jing Zhou & Richard Ronald, 2017. "The resurgence of public housing provision in China: the Chongqing programme," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 428-448, May.
    8. Juan Ming & Jiachun Liu & Zicheng Wang, 2020. "Does the Homeownership Gap Between Rural–Urban Migrants and Urban–Urban Migrants in China Vary by Income?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Landis & Vincent J. Reina, 2021. "Do Restrictive Land Use Regulations Make Housing More Expensive Everywhere?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 305-324, November.
    2. Amrita Chhachhi & Eli Friedman, 2014. "Alienated Politics: Labour Insurgency and the Paternalistic State in China," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 1001-1018, September.
    3. Juan Ming & Jiachun Liu & Zicheng Wang, 2020. "Does the Homeownership Gap Between Rural–Urban Migrants and Urban–Urban Migrants in China Vary by Income?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    4. Yongxiao Du & Hao Dong, 2023. "Homeownership pathways and fertility in urban China," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Shaun S.K. Teo, 2023. "SOCIALLY ENGAGED MUNICIPAL STATECRAFT IN URBAN CHINA? The Shenzhen Biennale as Situated Planning Experiment," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 581-600, July.
    6. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    7. Biao Zhang & Dian Shao & Zhonghu Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Dynamic, Effect and Governance Policy of Construction Land Use in Urban Agglomeration: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, May.
    8. Qiang Fu, 2015. "When fiscal recentralisation meets urban reforms: Prefectural land finance and its association with access to housing in urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1791-1809, August.
    9. Roestamy, Martin & Martin, Abraham Yazdi & Rusli, Radif Khotamir & Fulazzaky, Mohamad Ali, 2022. "A review of the reliability of land bank institution in Indonesia for effective land management of public interest," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Iris Claus & Les Oxley & Jie Chen & Xuehui Han, 2014. "The Evolution Of The Housing Market And Its Socioeconomic Impacts In The Post-Reform People'S Republic Of China: A Survey Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 652-670, September.
    11. Nicholas A. Phelps & Julie T. Miao & Zhigang Li & Sainan Lin, 2021. "From Socialist Subject to Capitalist Object: Industry Enclave Life Past and Present in Wuhan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 99-115, January.
    12. Eddie Chi Man Hui & Ka Hung Yu & Yinchuan Ye, 2014. "Housing Preferences of Temporary Migrants in Urban China in the wake of Gradual Hukou Reform: A Case Study of Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1384-1398, July.
    13. Wang, Zhi & Zhang, Qinghua, 2014. "Fundamental factors in the housing markets of China," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 53-61.
    14. Ihlanfeldt, Keith & Mayock, Tom, 2018. "School segregation and the foreclosure crisis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 277-290.
    15. Juan Yan & Marietta Haffner & Marja Elsinga, 2021. "Inclusionary Housing: An Evaluation of a New Public Rental Housing Governance Instrument in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Dean Curran & Alan Smart, 2021. "Data-driven governance, smart urbanism and risk-class inequalities: Security and social credit in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 487-506, February.
    17. Xizan Jin & Tachia Chin & Junli Yu & Yanjiang Zhang & Yingshuang Shi, 2020. "How Government’s Policy Implementation Methods Influence Urban Villagers’ Acceptance of Urban Revitalization Programs: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Baixue Yu & Geng Niu & Jingjing Ye & Wen‐wen Zhang, 2023. "Human capital agglomeration, institutional barriers, and internal migration in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 284-303, March.
    19. Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "The Effects of Inequality, Density, and Heterogeneous Residential Preferences on Urban Displacement and Metropolitan Structure: An Agent-Based Model," SocArXiv mkq7d, Center for Open Science.
    20. Salim Furth & MaryJo Webster, 2023. "Single-Family Zoning and Race: Evidence From the Twin Cities," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 821-843, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221101053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.