IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211058184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade Relations Between Mauritius and China: A Gravity Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijie Guan
  • Yue Zhang
  • Ip Ping Sheong Jim Kwee Fat

Abstract

Trade between Mauritius and China has been increasing at a rapid pace. As there are only few studies about Sino-Mauritian trade, there is therefore a need to study the determinants affecting trade flows between the two countries. This paper uses the “Gravity Model†with a sample data of 23 years (1997–2019) to analyze the trade between Mauritius and China. The results show that GDP’s growth rate, exchange rate, and FDI both have significant effects on Mauritian trade; however the former has a positive effect while the latter two has a negative one. The economic mass of the two countries have promoted trade, while an appreciation in Chinese currency and large amounts of direct investment have on the other side hindered Mauritian trade. A concrete trade agreement between the two sides can help in reducing the costs of trade between the two countries and improve the situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijie Guan & Yue Zhang & Ip Ping Sheong Jim Kwee Fat, 2021. "Trade Relations Between Mauritius and China: A Gravity Model Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211058184
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211058184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211058184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211058184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miao Miao & Qiaoqi Lang & Dinkneh Gebre Borojo & Jiang Yushi & Xiaoyun Zhang, 2020. "The Impacts of Chinese FDI and China–Africa Trade on Economic Growth of African Countries: The Role of Institutional Quality," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zhijie Guan & Peichen Gong, 2015. "The impacts of international efforts to reduce illegal logging on China’s forest products trade flow," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 467-483, September.
    3. Sylviane Guillaumont Jeanneney & Ping Hua, 2015. "China’s African Financial Engagement, Real Exchange Rates and Trade between China and Africa," Post-Print halshs-01150612, HAL.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6k7m0q7h709rdrhbpm2n96irf8 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Thomas Chaney, 2018. "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: An Explanation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(1), pages 150-177.
    6. Santana-Gallego, Maria & Pérez-Rodríguez, Jorge V., 2019. "International trade, exchange rate regimes, and financial crises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 85-95.
    7. Faqin Lin & Wenshou Yan & Xiaosong Wang, 2017. "The impact of Africa-China's diplomatic visits on bilateral trade," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(3), pages 310-326, July.
    8. Luisa Kinzius & Alexander Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2019. "Trade protection and the role of non-tariff barriers," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(4), pages 603-643, November.
    9. Stefan Borsky & Andrea Leiter & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2018. "Product quality and sustainability: The effect of international environmental agreements on bilateral trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 3098-3129, November.
    10. Rongji Huang & Tengfei Nie & Yangguang Zhu & Shaofu Du, 2020. "Forecasting Trade Potential Between China and the Five Central Asian Countries: Under the Background of Belt and Road Initiative," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 1233-1247, April.
    11. Vladimir Ristanovic & Dusan Cogoljevic & Sinisa Barjaktarevic, 2017. "Direction of Serbian Trade: Gravity Model Based on Pool Data," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(36), pages 21-33, May.
    12. Pooja Khosla, 2015. "Intra-Regional Trade In Africa And The Impact Of Chinese Intervention: A Gravity Model Approach," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 40(4), pages 41-66, December.
    13. Erik Figueiredo & Luiz Renato Lima, 2020. "Do economic integration agreements affect trade predictability? A group effect analysis," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 637-664, May.
    14. Thomas Chaney, 2013. "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: An Explanation," Working Papers hal-03460790, HAL.
    15. Thomas Rudolf Wiese, 2014. "The cyclical component of GDP and life satisfaction: The impact of the Mediterranean welfare system," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 36(4), pages 529-542, December.
    16. Upinder Sawhney & Tanvi Kiran, 2019. "Bilateral Trade Among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa Economies: An Empirical Analysis," Millennial Asia, , vol. 10(2), pages 204-228, August.
    17. Yvonne Umulisa, 2020. "Estimation of the East African Community's trade benefits from promoting intra‐regional trade," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(1), pages 55-66, March.
    18. Shimu Afroza Ahammed & Islam Md. Shahidul, 2018. "Impacts of Macro economic variables on the RMG Export Growth of Bangladesh," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 112-125, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wani Suadat Hussain & Mir M. Afzal, 2023. "Import Determinants and Potential Markets of Pakistan: An Application of PPML Gravity Model," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 57-73, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hildegunn K. Nordås & Dorothée Rouzet, 2017. "The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Trade Flows," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1155-1183, June.
    2. Anna Wong, 2017. "China’s Current Account : External Rebalancing or Capital Flight?," International Finance Discussion Papers 1208, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Thomas Chaney, 2014. "The Network Structure of International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(11), pages 3600-3634, November.
    4. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zofío, José L., 2018. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-87.
    5. Montinari, Letizia & Stracca, Livio, 2016. "Trade, finance or policies: What drives the cross-border spill-over of business cycles?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 131-148.
    6. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer & Mathias Thoenig, 2014. "Welfare and Trade without Pareto," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 310-316, May.
    7. Nakhoda, Aadil, 2013. "The impact of the exports of BRIC countries plus Turkey on the exports of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 52477, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Eduardo Morales & Gloria Sheu & Andrés Zahler, 2019. "Extended Gravity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(6), pages 2668-2712.
    9. Elisaveta Archanskaia & Guillaume Daudin, 2012. "Heterogeneity and the Distance Puzzle," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2012-17, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    10. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5fjm1f1p0v93k9png4qo8ltnrf is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2013. "What separates us? Sources of resistance to globalization," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 46(4), pages 1196-1231, November.
    12. Lugovskyy, Oleksandr & Skiba, Alexandre, 2014. "Effect of distance on trade under slope heterogeneity and cross-correlated effects," Economics Discussion Papers 2014-30, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Ali Palali & Bas Straathof & Rinske Windig, 2017. "The effect of geographical distance on online transactions: Evidence from the Netherlands," CPB Discussion Paper 362, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Antoine Berthou & Hélène Ehrhart, 2017. "Trade networks and colonial trade spillovers," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 891-923, September.
    15. R. S.-H. Lee & M. Pak, 2018. "Pro-competitive effects of globalisation on prices, productivity and markups: Evidence in the Euro Area," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2018-06, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    16. Head, Keith & Jing, Ran & Swenson, Deborah L., 2014. "From Beijing to Bentonville: Do multinational retailers link markets?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-92.
    17. Michal Paulus & Eva Michalikova & Vladimir Benacek, 2014. "German International Trade: Interpreting Export Flows According to the Gravity Model," Working Papers IES 2014/19, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised May 2014.
    18. Xinran Liu, 2019. "Effects of Multiple Dimensions of Intangible Distance on Agro-food Exports: Evidence from China," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 1-75, December.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9j4i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Vittorio Carlei & Francesca Affortunato & Alessandro Marra & Marco Brogi, 2019. "Does centrality of importing countries affect export prices in the global trade?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 529-551, January.
    21. Ali Palali & Bas Straathof & Rinske Windig, 2017. "The effect of geographical distance on online transactions: Evidence from the Netherlands," CPB Discussion Paper 362.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    22. Yasin Kuso, 2018. "Impact of Currency Union on Trade: Comparative Analysis of EMU and SACU - Gravity Model Approach," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(4), pages 102-115, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211058184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.