IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p2158244020988249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Driven Approach to Dual Service Failure Monitoring From Negative Online Reviews: Managerial Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Junegak Joung
  • Ki-Hun Kim
  • Kwangsoo Kim

Abstract

Monitoring of dual service failures (e.g., trends in service failures and consecutive service failures) in business is emphasized for service quality management. Previous studies analyzing negative online reviews to conduct dual service failure monitoring from a managerial perspective are scarce. Numerous negative online reviews are useful sources for dual service failure monitoring because they can be easily collected at a low cost. This article proposes a data-driven approach to monitor service failure trends and consecutive service failures from negative online reviews. In the proposed approach, first a classifier is developed to categorize newly collected negative reviews into service failures by Latent Dirichlet allocation. Subsequently, a threshold value is provided to identify a new type of service failure, which was not achieved previously using a control chart. Finally, the probability of consecutive service failures is obtained by association rule mining. A case study of Uber is conducted to validate the proposed approach. The results exhibit that the proposed approach can perform dual service failure monitoring. This study can increase marketing intelligence for dynamic management of service failure and allow rapid responses to service failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Junegak Joung & Ki-Hun Kim & Kwangsoo Kim, 2021. "Data-Driven Approach to Dual Service Failure Monitoring From Negative Online Reviews: Managerial Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244020988249
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020988249
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020988249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kun & Park, Oun-joung & Yun, Seunghyun & Yun, Haejung, 2017. "What makes tourists feel negatively about tourism destinations? Application of hybrid text mining methodology to smart destination management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 362-369.
    2. Bomi Song & Changyong Lee & Byungun Yoon & Yongtae Park, 2016. "Diagnosing service quality using customer reviews: an index approach based on sentiment and gap analyses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 775-798, December.
    3. Aron Culotta & Jennifer Cutler, 2016. "Mining Brand Perceptions from Twitter Social Networks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 343-362, May.
    4. Jian-Wu Bi & Yang Liu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Erik Cambria, 2019. "Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(22), pages 7068-7088, November.
    5. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou & Di Cai & Arvid Kappas, 2010. "Sentiment strength detection in short informal text," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2544-2558, December.
    6. Ruth N. Bolton, 1998. "A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 45-65.
    7. Halstead, Diane & Morash, Edward A. & Ozment, John, 1996. "Comparing objective service failures and subjective complaints : An investigation of domino and halo effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 107-115, June.
    8. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou & Di Cai & Arvid Kappas, 2010. "Sentiment strength detection in short informal text," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2544-2558, December.
    9. A. Peter McGraw & Caleb Warren & Christina Kan, 2015. "Humorous Complaining," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(5), pages 1153-1171.
    10. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Kuo Chen & Dalianus Riantama & Long-Sheng Chen, 2020. "Using a Text Mining Approach to Hear Voices of Customers from Social Media toward the Fast-Food Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Nohel Zaman & David M. Goldberg & Richard J. Gruss & Alan S. Abrahams & Siriporn Srisawas & Peter Ractham & Michelle M.H. Şeref, 2022. "Cross-Category Defect Discovery from Online Reviews: Supplementing Sentiment with Category-Specific Semantics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1265-1285, August.
    3. Kinra, Aseem & Beheshti-Kashi, Samaneh & Buch, Rasmus & Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick & Pereira, Francisco, 2020. "Examining the potential of textual big data analytics for public policy decision-making: A case study with driverless cars in Denmark," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 68-78.
    4. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    5. Ma, Jie & Tse, Ying Kei & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Minhao, 2019. "Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – An empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 192-205.
    6. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Lee, Yuan Ting & Callaghan, Max & Jankin, Slava & Minx, Jan C., 2022. "The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Daesik Kim & Chung Joo Chung & Kihong Eom, 2022. "Measuring Online Public Opinion for Decision Making: Application of Deep Learning on Political Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Gabriele Ranco & Ilaria Bordino & Giacomo Bormetti & Guido Caldarelli & Fabrizio Lillo & Michele Treccani, 2014. "Coupling news sentiment with web browsing data improves prediction of intra-day price dynamics," Papers 1412.3948, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2015.
    10. Tadić, Bosiljka & Mitrović Dankulov, Marija & Melnik, Roderick, 2023. "Evolving cycles and self-organised criticality in social dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Ping-Yu Hsu & Hong-Tsuen Lei & Shih-Hsiang Huang & Teng Hao Liao & Yao-Chung Lo & Chin-Chun Lo, 2019. "Effects of sentiment on recommendations in social network," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 253-262, June.
    12. Cohen, Scott & Stienmetz, Jason & Hanna, Paul & Humbracht, Michael & Hopkins, Debbie, 2020. "Shadowcasting tourism knowledge through media: Self-driving sex cars?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Zhang, Xuetong & Zhang, Weiguo, 2023. "Information asymmetry, sentiment interactions, and asset price," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Indy Wijngaards & Martijn Burger & Job van Exel, 2019. "The promise of open survey questions—The validation of text-based job satisfaction measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Ema Kušen & Mark Strembeck, 2021. "“Evacuate everyone south of that line” Analyzing structural communication patterns during natural disasters," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 531-565, November.
    16. Wen Zhang & Daniel R. Fesenmaier, 2018. "Assessing emotions in online stories: comparing self-report and text-based approaches," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 83-95, December.
    17. Sejung Park & Jin-A Choi, 2023. "Comparing public responses to apologies: examining crisis communication strategies using network analysis and topic modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3603-3620, August.
    18. Simon Albrecht & Bernhard Lutz & Dirk Neumann, 2020. "The behavior of blockchain ventures on Twitter as a determinant for funding success," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 241-257, June.
    19. Zibarzani, Masoumeh & Abumalloh, Rabab Ali & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Samad, Sarminah & Alghamdi, O.A. & Nayer, Fatima Khan & Ismail, Muhammed Yousoof & Mohd, Saidatulakmal & Mohammed Akib, Noor Adelyna, 2022. "Customer satisfaction with Restaurants Service Quality during COVID-19 outbreak: A two-stage methodology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Jun Lee & Adam Jatowt & Kyoung‐Sook Kim, 2021. "Discovering underlying sensations of human emotions based on social media," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(4), pages 417-432, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244020988249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.