IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i3p2158244020953177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Comprehension of Lecture Content in a Foreign Language as the Medium of Instruction: Comparing Speech-to-Text Recognition With Speech-Enabled Language Translation

Author

Listed:
  • Rustam Shadiev
  • Yu-Cheng Chien
  • Yueh-Min Huang

Abstract

Scholars suggest that not every student completely comprehends the content of a lecture in a foreign language as the medium of instruction, especially in the case of those with low language ability. To facilitate comprehension of lectures in a foreign language, learning content was presented to students in multiple modalities; that is, in addition to verbal (speech of the instructor) and visual (lecture slides) content, texts generated by speech-to-text recognition (STR) or speech-enabled language translation (SELT) were shown to the students. The goal was to compare how these two additional content modalities (i.e., STR-texts vs. SELT-texts) facilitate student comprehension of lecture content. Because processing multimodal content requires additional cognitive resources, another goal was to explore whether STR-texts versus SELT-texts impose any cognitive load on the students. To this end, two groups of students were recruited, where they attended two lectures at the intermediate and advanced levels. STR-texts were shown to a control group, and SELT-texts were shown to an experimental group. The posttest results and the cognitive load of the students in both groups after each lecture were compared. Four main findings were obtained: (a) The experimental group outperformed the control group on both posttests. However, when student language ability was considered, the difference was statistically significant for low ability students only; (b) there was not a significant between-group difference in cognitive load; however, if student language ability was considered, a significant between-group difference existed during the more difficult lecture; (c) between-group differences in self-efficacy were statistically insignificant; and (d) associations among some research variables were found. Based on these results, several implications were drawn for the teaching and research community.

Suggested Citation

  • Rustam Shadiev & Yu-Cheng Chien & Yueh-Min Huang, 2020. "Enhancing Comprehension of Lecture Content in a Foreign Language as the Medium of Instruction: Comparing Speech-to-Text Recognition With Speech-Enabled Language Translation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:2158244020953177
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020953177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020953177
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020953177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rustam Shadiev & Mengke Yang, 2020. "Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kun Zhang & Haoxian Wu, 2022. "Synchronous Online Learning During COVID-19: Chinese University EFL Students’ Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    2. Xue Wang & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Improvement of Students’ Autonomous Learning Behavior by Optimizing Foreign Language Blended Learning Mode," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    3. Ting Liu & Zhipeng Zhang & Xuesong (Andy) Gao, 2023. "Pedagogical Design in Technology-Enhanced Language Education Research: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Xinyi Huang & Di Zou & Gary Cheng & Haoran Xie, 2021. "A Systematic Review of AR and VR Enhanced Language Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Yuh-Shihng Chang, 2021. "Applying the ARCS Motivation Theory for the Assessment of AR Digital Media Design Learning Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Yi-Pin Huang & Xiao-Li Zheng & Chuang-Kai Chiu & Jun Lei & Gang Yang & Hoisoo Kim & Feng Wang, 2021. "Towards Figurative Expression Enhancement: Effects of the SVVR-Supported Worked Example Approach on the Descriptive Writing of Highly Engaged Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Ting-Chia Hsu & Ching Chang & Lung-Hsiang Wong & Guat Poh Aw, 2022. "Learning Performance of Different Genders’ Computational Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Prodhan Mahbub Ibna Seraj & Blanka Klimova & Hadina Habil, 2021. "Use of Mobile Phones in Teaching English in Bangladesh: A Systematic Review (2010–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:2158244020953177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.