IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i2p2158244020923354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Rebellion: Self-Organized Criticality of Contemporary Protest Movements

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Zhukov
  • Konstantin Kunavin
  • Sergey Lyamin

Abstract

The theory of self-organized criticality (SOC) is applicable for explaining powerful surges of protest activity on social media. The objects of study were two protest clusters. The first was a set of Facebook groups that promoted the impeachment of the Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff. The second was a set of groups on the social network Vkontakte that provided support for anti-government rallies in Armenia, referred to as Electric Yerevan. Numerous groups in the examined clusters were functioning in SOC mode during certain periods. Those clusters were able to generate information avalanches—seemingly spontaneous, powerful surges of creation, transmission, and reproduction of information. The facts are presented that supported the assumptions that SOC effects in social networks are associated with mass actions on the streets, including violence. The observations of SOC make it possible to reveal certain periods when the course of a sociopolitical system is least stable.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Zhukov & Konstantin Kunavin & Sergey Lyamin, 2020. "Online Rebellion: Self-Organized Criticality of Contemporary Protest Movements," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020923354
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020923354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020923354
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020923354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ichiro Shimada & Tomio Koyama, 2015. "A Theory for Complex Systems Social Change: An Application of a General 'Criticality' Model," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 13(3), pages 342-353.
    2. Cederman, Lars-Erik, 2003. "Modeling the Size of Wars: From Billiard Balls to Sandpiles," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(1), pages 135-150, February.
    3. Raymond-Alain Thietart, 2016. "Strategy dynamics: Agency, path dependency, and self-organized emergence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 774-792, April.
    4. Dmitry S. Zhukov & Valery V. Kanishchev & Sergey K. Lyamin, 2016. "Application of the Theory of Self-Organized Criticality to the Investigation of Historical Processes," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, December.
    5. Andergassen, Rainer & Nardini, Franco & Ricottilli, Massimo, 2006. "Innovation waves, self-organized criticality and technological convergence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 710-728, December.
    6. Brunk, Gregory G., 2001. "Self-Organized Criticality: A New Theory of Political Behaviour and Some of Its Implications," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 427-445, April.
    7. repec:zna:indecs:v:13:y:2015:i:2:p:342-353 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmitry S. Zhukov & Valery V. Kanishchev & Sergey K. Lyamin, 2016. "Application of the Theory of Self-Organized Criticality to the Investigation of Historical Processes," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, December.
    2. Dmitry S. Zhukov & Sergey K. Lyamin, 2016. "The Modeling of Institutional Modernization by Means of Fractal Geometry," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    3. Tadić, Bosiljka & Mitrović Dankulov, Marija & Melnik, Roderick, 2023. "Evolving cycles and self-organised criticality in social dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Brunk, Gregory G. & Hunter, Kennith G., 2008. "An ecological perspective on interest groups and economic stagnation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 194-212, February.
    5. Lu, Peng & Yang, Hou & Li, Mengdi & Zhang, Zhuo, 2021. "The sandpile model and empire dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Fleming, Sean W., 2021. "Scale-free networks, 1/f dynamics, and nonlinear conflict size scaling from an agent-based simulation model of societal-scale bilateral conflict and cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    7. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    8. Gregory G. Brunk, 2003. "Swarming of innovations, fractal patterns, and the historical time series of US patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(1), pages 61-80, January.
    9. Kim, Namil & Lee, Hyeokseong & Kim, Wonjoon & Lee, Hyunjong & Suh, Jong Hwan, 2015. "Dynamic patterns of industry convergence: Evidence from a large amount of unstructured data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1734-1748.
    10. Edoardo Mollona, 2017. "How visible is the visible hand of top management in strategic renewals? guided evolution and the intraorganizational ecology model of adaptation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 689-708.
    11. Rainer Andergassen & Franco Nardini & Massimo Ricottilli, 2015. "Emergence and Resilience in a Model of Innovation and Network Formation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 293-311, June.
    12. Yutaka NAKAI & Masayoshi Muto, 2008. "Emergence and Collapse of Peace with Friend Selection Strategies," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6.
    13. Rafael González-Val, 2016. "War Size Distribution: Empirical Regularities Behind Conflicts," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 838-853, November.
    14. Nils B. Weidmann, 2016. "Micro-cleavages and violence in civil wars: A computational assessment," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(5), pages 539-558, November.
    15. Aaron Clauset & Maxwell Young & Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, 2007. "On the Frequency of Severe Terrorist Events," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(1), pages 58-87, February.
    16. Cirillo, Pasquale & Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2016. "On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 452(C), pages 29-45.
    17. José A. Tenreiro Machado & António M. Lopes & Maria Eugénia Mata, 2020. "Computer Analysis of Human Belligerency," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Jelena Vićić & Erik Gartzke, 2024. "Cyber-enabled influence operations as a ‘center of gravity’ in cyberconflict: The example of Russian foreign interference in the 2016 US federal election," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 10-27, January.
    19. Pierpaolo Andriani & Bill McKelvey, 2009. "Perspective ---From Gaussian to Paretian Thinking: Causes and Implications of Power Laws in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 1053-1071, December.
    20. Aaron Clauset & Frederik W. Wiegel, 2010. "A Generalized Aggregation-Disintegration Model for the Frequency of Severe Terrorist Attacks," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 54(1), pages 179-197, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020923354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.