IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i2p2158244020920587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Did You Not Act on Our Suggestion? Regulatory and Growth-Oriented Opportunities During Ethical Review: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sean G. Dicks
  • Ian J. Pieper
  • Holly L. Northam
  • Frank M. P. van Haren
  • Douglas P. Boer

Abstract

In Australia, before conducting research with human participants, researchers must have their research plan reviewed by a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) to ensure that proposed methods meet ethical requirements and protect the welfare of participants. In addition, it has been proposed that HRECs can contribute to a novice researcher’s ethical mindfulness. To explore this suggestion, the current self-reflective case study examines the dialogue between a PhD candidate and the HREC that reviewed his proposed study of family bereavement in the context of the potential for organ donation. Findings suggest that when a respectful, problem-solving attitude is adopted by both parties, a learning environment evolves where diverse views, differences of opinion, and novel solutions are tolerated. In this context, the research plan is improved and the novice researcher’s ability to apply research ethics is developed. Simultaneously, members of the HREC gain practice in the identification of ethical dilemmas and the application of ethical principles that help resolve those dilemmas.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean G. Dicks & Ian J. Pieper & Holly L. Northam & Frank M. P. van Haren & Douglas P. Boer, 2020. "Why Did You Not Act on Our Suggestion? Regulatory and Growth-Oriented Opportunities During Ethical Review: A Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020920587
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020920587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020920587
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020920587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dyregrov, Kari, 2004. "Bereaved parents' experience of research participation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 391-400, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Y. Al‐Sagarat & Ayman M. Hamdan‐Mansour & Faris Al‐Sarayreh & Hani Nawafleh & Lorna Moxham, 2016. "Prevalence of aggressive behaviours among inpatients with psychiatric disorders: A case study analysis from Jordan," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 172-179, June.
    2. Karl Andriessen & Karolina Krysinska & Debra Rickwood & Jane Pirkis, 2022. "The Reactions of Adolescents, Parents and Clinicians to Participating in Qualitative Research Interviews Regarding Adolescents Bereaved by Suicide and Other Traumatic Death," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Hilde-Kristin Vegsund & Toril Rannestad & Trude Reinfjell & Unni Karin Moksnes & Alexandra Eilegård Wallin & Mary-Elizabeth Bradley Eilertsen, 2018. "Translation and Linguistic Validation of a Swedish Study-Specific Questionnaire for Use among Norwegian Parents Who Lost a Child to Cancer," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Trondsen, Marianne & Sandaunet, Anne-Grete, 2009. "The dual role of the action researcher," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 13-20, February.
    5. Lena Axelsson & Birgitta Klang & Carina Lundh Hagelin & Stefan H Jacobson & Sissel Andreassen Gleissman, 2015. "Meanings of being a close relative of a family member treated with haemodialysis approaching end of life," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 447-456, February.
    6. Kate Reed & Laura Towers, 2023. "Almost Confessional: Managing Emotions When Research Breaks Your Heart," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 28(1), pages 261-278, March.
    7. Gouda, H.N. & Kelly-Hanku, A. & Wilson, L. & Maraga, S. & Riley, I.D., 2016. "“Whenever they cry, I cry with them”: Reciprocal relationships and the role of ethics in a verbal autopsy study in Papua New Guinea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Myfanwy Maple & Sarah Wayland & Rebecca Sanford & Ailbhe Spillane & Sarah Coker, 2020. "Carers’ Motivations for, and Experiences of, Participating in Suicide Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Julius Sim & Jackie Waterfield, 2019. "Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 3003-3022, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020920587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.