IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i2p225-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A condition-based preventive replacement policy with imperfect manual inspection for a two-stage deterioration process

Author

Listed:
  • Hui-Ying Wang
  • Zhao-Qiang Wang

Abstract

This article proposes a novel preventive replacement policy based on condition monitoring and imperfect manual inspection for systems subject to a two-stage deterioration process, where the two-stage deterioration process is modeled by the white noise process and Brownian motion with a drift, respectively. The proposed preventive replacement policy is implemented using two thresholds: a failure threshold and a preventive threshold. Specifically, if the condition monitoring measurement is observed to cross the failure threshold, then the failure replacement will be carried out; and, if the condition monitoring measurement is observed to cross the preventive threshold while lower than the failure threshold, then the system needs to be checked by manual inspection, and the preventive replacement will be carried out once the system is found to be in the defective state. In this article, we consider that manual inspection is imperfect, namely, there is a probability that the defect will be unnoticed. By minimizing the expected cost per unit time, we obtain the optimal condition monitoring interval and preventive threshold. A numerical example is provided to demonstrate the performance of the proposed condition-based replacement policy. Comparisons are made with the existing work, which shows the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui-Ying Wang & Zhao-Qiang Wang, 2022. "A condition-based preventive replacement policy with imperfect manual inspection for a two-stage deterioration process," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 225-236, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:2:p:225-236
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20916321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20916321
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20916321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhaoqiang Wang & Changhua Hu & Wenbin Wang & Xiangyu Kong & Wei Zhang, 2015. "A prognostics-based spare part ordering and system replacement policy for a deteriorating system subjected to a random lead time," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(15), pages 4511-4527, August.
    2. Wenbin Wang, 2008. "Delay Time Modelling," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 14, pages 345-370, Springer.
    3. Kallen, M.J. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2005. "Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 177-185.
    4. Cui, L. R. & Loh, H. T. & Xie, M., 2004. "Sequential inspection strategy for multiple systems under availability requirement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 170-177, May.
    5. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    6. Jiang, R., 2010. "Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 208-215.
    7. Qingan Qiu & Lirong Cui & Dejing Kong, 2019. "Availability and maintenance modeling for a two-component system with dependent failures over a finite time horizon," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 200-210, April.
    8. Dong, Qinglai & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "A study on stochastic degradation process models under different types of failure Thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-212.
    9. W Wang & P A Scarf & M A J Smith, 2000. "On the application of a model of condition-based maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(11), pages 1218-1227, November.
    10. Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "Gamma process based optimal mission abort policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    11. A H Christer, 1999. "Developments in delay time analysis for modelling plant maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(11), pages 1120-1137, November.
    12. Coit, David W. & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "The evolution of system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Chen, Nan & Shen, Yan, 2015. "A new class of Wiener process models for degradation analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 58-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lirong Cui & David W Coit, 2022. "Guest Editorial: SMRLO-2019 Special Issue," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 223-224, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wenbin & Zhao, Fei & Peng, Rui, 2014. "A preventive maintenance model with a two-level inspection policy based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 207-220.
    2. Xuejuan Liu & Wenbin Wang & Rui Peng & Fei Zhao, 2015. "A delay-time-based inspection model for parallel systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 556-567, December.
    3. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    4. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    5. Wang, Huiying & Wang, Wenbin & Peng, Rui, 2017. "A two-phase inspection model for a single component system with three-stage degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 31-40.
    6. van Oosterom, C.D. & Elwany, A.H. & Çelebi, D. & van Houtum, G.J., 2014. "Optimal policies for a delay time model with postponed replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 186-197.
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    8. C. Drent & S. Kapodistria & J. A. C. Resing, 2019. "Condition-based maintenance policies under imperfect maintenance at scheduled and unscheduled opportunities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 269-308, December.
    9. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    11. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    12. Wenbin Wang & Wenjuan Zhang, 2005. "A model to predict the residual life of aircraft engines based upon oil analysis data," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 276-284, April.
    13. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio, 2022. "A study on the economic and environmental viability of second-hand items in maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    15. Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S. & Scarf, P.A., 2018. "A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 911-919.
    16. Hao, Songhua & Yang, Jun & Berenguer, Christophe, 2019. "Degradation analysis based on an extended inverse Gaussian process model with skew-normal random effects and measurement errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 261-270.
    17. Wang, Wenbin & Syntetos, Aris A., 2011. "Spare parts demand: Linking forecasting to equipment maintenance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1209.
    18. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Ergodicity of forward times of the renewal process in a block-based inspection model using the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-7.
    19. Ruifeng Yang & Jianshe Kang, 2017. "Joint optimization for inspection and replacement model based on a three-stage failure process," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 118-128, January.
    20. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "A joint spare part and maintenance inspection optimisation model using the Delay-Time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1535-1541.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:2:p:225-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.