IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v190y2019ic19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gamma process based optimal mission abort policy

Author

Listed:
  • Qiu, Qingan
  • Cui, Lirong

Abstract

Various safety-critical systems such as aircrafts, submarines and space stations are required to perform missions continually in harsh environment. To enhance the survivability of such systems, a mission can be aborted when the mission completion becomes problematic and a rescue procedure is immediately initiated. This paper investigates the optimal mission abort policy based on a two-stage Gamma process which can be separated into normal and defective stages. Degradation-based abort policy where a mission is aborted if the system degradation level is higher than a threshold and duration-based abort policy where a mission is aborted if the duration in defective stage is larger than a threshold are considered. The mission success probability and system survivability under these two policies are evaluated and the optimal mission abort thresholds balancing the tradeoff between the mission success probability and system survivability are investigated. A numerical example on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed abort policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "Gamma process based optimal mission abort policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:190:y:2019:i:c:19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019300031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Xiaoyue & Hillston, Jane, 2015. "Mission reliability of semi-Markov systems under generalized operational time requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 122-129.
    2. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim & Levitin, Gregory, 2018. "Optimal mission abort policy for partially repairable heterogeneous systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 818-825.
    3. Peng, Rui, 2018. "Joint routing and aborting optimization of cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 131-137.
    4. Qingan Qiu & Lirong Cui & Jingyuan Shen, 2018. "Availability and maintenance modeling for systems subject to dependent hard and soft failures," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 513-527, July.
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    6. Gregory Levitin & Maxim Finkelstein, 2018. "Optimal mission abort policy with multiple shock number thresholds," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 607-615, December.
    7. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2018. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems in a random environment with variable shock rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-17.
    8. Maxim Finkelstein, 2008. "Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-986-8, March.
    9. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2018. "Co-optimization of state dependent loading and mission abort policy in heterogeneous warm standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 151-158.
    10. Lu, Ji-Min & Wu, Xiao-Yue & Liu, Yiliu & Ann Lundteigen, Mary, 2015. "Reliability analysis of large phased-mission systems with repairable components based on success-state sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 123-133.
    11. Yang, Li & Ye, Zhi-sheng & Lee, Chi-Guhn & Yang, Su-fen & Peng, Rui, 2019. "A two-phase preventive maintenance policy considering imperfect repair and postponed replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 966-977.
    12. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2016. "A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-104.
    13. Yang, Li & Zhao, Yu & Peng, Rui & Ma, Xiaobing, 2018. "Hybrid preventive maintenance of competing failures under random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 130-140.
    14. Dong, Qinglai & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "A study on stochastic degradation process models under different types of failure Thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-212.
    15. Gregory Levitin & Maxim Finkelstein, 2018. "Optimal Mission Abort Policy for Systems Operating in a Random Environment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 795-803, April.
    16. Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong & Gao, Hongda & Yi, He, 2018. "Optimal allocation of units in sequential probability series systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 351-363.
    17. Alaa H. Elwany & Nagi Z. Gebraeel & Lisa M. Maillart, 2011. "Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 684-695, June.
    18. Gao, Hongda & Cui, Lirong & Qiu, Qingan, 2019. "Reliability modeling for degradation-shock dependence systems with multiple species of shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 133-143.
    19. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2018. "Mission abort policy balancing the uncompleted mission penalty and system loss risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 194-201.
    20. Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2018. "Optimal Mission Duration for Partially Repairable Systems Operating in a Random Environment," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 505-516, June.
    21. Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems subject to random shocks based on virtual age process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 11-20.
    22. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Luo, Liang, 2019. "Influence of failure propagation on mission abort policy in heterogeneous warm standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 29-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems subject to random shocks based on virtual age process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 11-20.
    2. Zhao, Xian & Fan, Yu & Qiu, Qingan & Chen, Ke, 2021. "Multi-criteria mission abort policy for systems subject to two-stage degradation process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 233-245.
    3. Ke Chen & Xian Zhao & Qingan Qiu, 2022. "Optimal Task Abort and Maintenance Policies Considering Time Redundancy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Qiu, Qingan & Kou, Meng & Chen, Ke & Deng, Qiao & Kang, Fengming & Lin, Cong, 2021. "Optimal stopping problems for mission oriented systems considering time redundancy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2020. "Mission abort policy optimization for series systems with overlapping primary and rescue subsystems operating in a random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Zhao, Xian & Chai, Xiaofei & Sun, Jinglei & Qiu, Qingan, 2021. "Joint optimization of mission abort and component switching policies for multistate warm standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Xiang, Yanping, 2020. "Optimal abort rules and subtask distribution in missions performed by multiple independent heterogeneous units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Gregory Levitin & Maxim Finkelstein & Hong‐Zhong Huang, 2019. "Optimal Abort Rules for Multiattempt Missions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2732-2743, December.
    9. Zhao, Xian & Sun, Jinglei & Qiu, Qingan & Chen, Ke, 2021. "Optimal inspection and mission abort policies for systems subject to degradation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 610-621.
    10. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Xiang, Yanping, 2021. "Optimal mission abort policies for repairable multistate systems performing multi-attempt mission," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2022. "Optimal mission aborting in multistate systems with storage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    12. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2022. "Using kamikaze components in multi-attempt missions with abort option," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Zhao, Xian & Liu, Haoran & Wu, Yaguang & Qiu, Qingan, 2023. "Joint optimization of mission abort and system structure considering dynamic tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2021. "Dynamic task distribution balancing primary mission work and damage reduction work in parallel systems exposed to shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Xiang, Yanping, 2020. "Optimal aborting rule in multi-attempt missions performed by multicomponent systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 244-252.
    16. Cheng, Guoqing & Li, Ling & Shangguan, Chunxia & Yang, Nan & Jiang, Bo & Tao, Ningrong, 2023. "Optimal joint inspection and mission abort policy for a partially observable system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    17. Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong & Wu, Bei, 2020. "Dynamic mission abort policy for systems operating in a controllable environment with self-healing mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Zhao, Xian & Chai, Xiaofei & Sun, Jinglei & Qiu, Qingan, 2021. "Optimal bivariate mission abort policy for systems operate in random shock environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    19. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Xiang, Yanping, 2021. "Optimal aborting strategy for three-phase missions performed by multiple units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Zhu, Xiaoning & Zhu, Xiaoping & Yan, Rui & Peng, Rui, 2021. "Optimal routing, aborting and hitting strategies of UAVs executing hitting the targets considering the defense range of targets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:190:y:2019:i:c:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.