IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i5p744-760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method and software platform for electronic COTS parts reliability estimation in space applications

Author

Listed:
  • Elaheh Rabiei
  • Lixian Huang
  • Hao-Yu Chien
  • Arjun Earthperson
  • Mihai A Diaconeasa
  • Jason Woo
  • Subramanian Iyer
  • Mark White
  • Ali Mosleh

Abstract

Adoption of electronic Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) parts in various industrial products is rapidly increasing due to the accessibility and appealing lower cost of these commodities. Depending on the type of application, having an accurate understanding of the COTS failure information can be crucial to ensure the reliability and safety of the final products. On the other hand, frequent large-scale testing is often cost prohibitive and time consuming for emerging technologies, especially in the consumer electronics sector where minimizing time-to-market and cost is critical. This paper presents a comprehensive Bayesian approach and software platform (named COTS Reliability Expert System), that integrates multiple pieces of heterogeneous information about the failure rate of COTS parts. The ultimate goal is to reduce dependency on testing for reliability analysis and yet to obtain a more accurate “order of magnitude†estimate of the failure rate through an efficient process. The method provides a foundation for incorporating manufacturers reliability data, estimates based on underlying physics-of-failure mechanisms and circuit simulations, partially relevant life test data of similar (but not necessarily identical) parts, and expert opinions on the manufacturing process of the COTS part of interest. The developed expert system uses Bayesian estimation to integrate all these types of evidence. The methodology is demonstrated in estimating the failure rate of a static random-access memory (SRAM) part.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaheh Rabiei & Lixian Huang & Hao-Yu Chien & Arjun Earthperson & Mihai A Diaconeasa & Jason Woo & Subramanian Iyer & Mark White & Ali Mosleh, 2021. "Method and software platform for electronic COTS parts reliability estimation in space applications," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 744-760, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:5:p:744-760
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X21998231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X21998231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X21998231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrique López Droguett & Ali Mosleh, 2008. "Bayesian Methodology for Model Uncertainty Using Model Performance Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1457-1476, October.
    2. Ali Mosleh & George Apostolakis, 1986. "The Assessment of Probability Distributions from Expert Opinions with an Application to Seismic Fragility Curves," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 447-461, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan-Shang Chang & Ali Mosleh, 2019. "Reliability of cable insulation under reaction- and diffusion-controlled thermal degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 639-647, August.
    2. Sakurahara, Tatsuya & Schumock, Grant & Reihani, Seyed & Kee, Ernie & Mohaghegh, Zahra, 2019. "Simulation-Informed Probabilistic Methodology for Common Cause Failure Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 84-99.
    3. Yuan-Shang Chang & Ali Mosleh, 2019. "Probabilistic model of degradation of cable insulations in nuclear power plants," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 803-814, October.
    4. Reza Kazemi & Ali Mosleh, 2012. "Improving Default Risk Prediction Using Bayesian Model Uncertainty Techniques," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(11), pages 1888-1900, November.
    5. James K. Hammitt & Alexander I. Shlyakhter, 1999. "The Expected Value of Information and the Probability of Surprise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 135-152, February.
    6. Abhinav B. Agrawal & Kash Barker & Yacov Y. Haimes, 2011. "Adaptive multiplayer approach for risk‐based decision‐making: 2006 Virginia Gubernatorial Inauguration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 455-470, December.
    7. Neil A. Stiber & Mitchell J. Small & Marina Pantazidou, 2004. "Site‐Specific Updating and Aggregation of Bayesian Belief Network Models for Multiple Experts," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1529-1538, December.
    8. Hui Jin & Mary Ann Lundteigen & Marvin Rausand, 2012. "Uncertainty assessment of reliability estimates for safety-instrumented systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(6), pages 646-655, December.
    9. Desheng Dash Wu & Xie Kefan & Chen Gang & Gui Ping, 2010. "A Risk Analysis Model in Concurrent Engineering Product Development," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(9), pages 1440-1453, September.
    10. Roger M. Cooke & Rudi Waij, 1986. "Monte Carlo Sampling for Generalized Knowledge Dependence with Application to Human Reliability," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 335-343, September.
    11. Radaideh, Majdi I. & Borowiec, Katarzyna & Kozlowski, Tomasz, 2019. "Integrated framework for model assessment and advanced uncertainty quantification of nuclear computer codes under Bayesian statistics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 357-377.
    12. Enrique López Droguett & Ali Mosleh, 2013. "Integrated treatment of model and parameter uncertainties through a Bayesian approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(1), pages 41-54, February.
    13. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping & Zhang, Chao & Tomovic, Mileta, 2018. "Bayesian model averaging based reliability analysis method for monotonic degradation dataset based on inverse Gaussian process and Gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 25-38.
    14. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.
    15. Dimitri V. Val & Leon Chernin & Daniil Yurchenko, 2021. "Updatable Probabilistic Evaluation of Failure Rates of Mechanical Components in Power Take-Off Systems of Tidal Stream Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. R. Gerrard & A. Tsanakas, 2011. "Failure Probability Under Parameter Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 727-744, May.
    17. Enrique López Droguett & Ali Mosleh, 2014. "Bayesian Treatment of Model Uncertainty for Partially Applicable Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 252-270, February.
    18. Piero Baraldi & Enrico Zio, 2010. "A Comparison Between Probabilistic and Dempster‐Shafer Theory Approaches to Model Uncertainty Analysis in the Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(7), pages 1139-1156, July.
    19. Zhou, Taotao & Droguett, Enrique López & Modarres, Mohammad, 2020. "A common cause failure model for components under age-related degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Ali Jamshidi & Shahrzad Faghih‐Roohi & Siamak Hajizadeh & Alfredo Núñez & Robert Babuska & Rolf Dollevoet & Zili Li & Bart De Schutter, 2017. "A Big Data Analysis Approach for Rail Failure Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1495-1507, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:5:p:744-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.